Originally Posted by epitaph (Post 923473)

What about the new wonderpatch? Could u patch kernel-power please?

Originally Posted by Netweaver (Post 923658)

mmmm based on power46, that would mean all PR1.3 improvements, h-e-n patches, injection patches and bfs (with build in scheduletool) and probably lots of stuff I forgot... nice. Don't forget f-cam drivers, make it 'eyes-closed' installable and you have a winner.

There might be an updated h-e-n out this month (as Joerg was hinting at). Hopefully it's only gui/frontend stuff. If extra kernel mods are needed, then work might have to be redone ...

Originally Posted by epitaph (Post 924461)

What about the wonder-patch? I think the wonder-patch wins over bfs and bfs is made from a noob and what is this for a name? brain **** scheduler?

Originally Posted by iDont (Post 924554)

I'm not interested in vanilla kernel-power and, if I'm thinking about the same patch as you do, the patch won't work for kernel-bfs (as BFS doesn't support cgroups). I even doubt whether the patch will help kernel-power because of the way Nokia configured Maemo.


All the features from kernel-power are also to be found in kernel-bfs (which include those you've named with the exception of the injection drivers, which aren't part of kernel-power either). F-cam drivers can be found on the garage page of kernel-bfs as well.

As of now, kernel-bfs is a niche project; those who actively want to use it most likely will use it, but the vast majority sticks to the vanilla kernel(-power).


Please read up on Con Kolivas. Also, use whatever you think suits you the best :)

Originally Posted by epitaph (Post 924565)

5% improvement in pulseaudio isn't that impressive.

Originally Posted by MaddogG (Post 924572)

If you can do better, you're welcome :)

Originally Posted by epitaph (Post 924577)

dude, what is the difference between the wonder-patch and bfs? and about con he is a dr. med. he is not even a dr. math or dr. informatic. it is his hobby!

Originally Posted by MaddogG (Post 924591)

I'm not a kernel expert, so I don't know :p (do you?)

I just think that is not so nice to ctiticise other's work only because you wanted something else. If you want wonder-patch so much, I think you should try to apply it to power kernel by yourself instead of keep asking...

Originally Posted by epitaph (Post 924597)

:)

yes i want it very much also bfs cannot hurt so plz patch kernel-power with it. it would be awesome. also there is compcache a nice patch too. I want it too.

Originally Posted by epitaph (Post 924577)

and about con he is a dr. med. he is not even a dr. math or dr. informatic. it is his hobby!

Originally Posted by retsaw (Post 925000)

What's your point? The maintainer of the linux kernel scheduler (Ingo Molnar) used the ideas (albeit not the code) from his earlier work to write the CFS scheduler for the kernel. And it seemed to me the reasons that Con's actual work wasn't accepted into the kernel were political more than anything else. Just because he didn't study it at Uni doesn't mean he is clueless in this field.

Originally Posted by epitaph (Post 925008)

My point is I'm new to this device I have already ported my tune-up script from my router and other linux box and I have just compiled read-ahead so that I can modify this parameter of my device and it is feeling great and I believe it is more respnsive but I met here a lot of ppl who think of themself higher then the rest but when I asked they don't answer to me or doesn't take me serious. Also with my new read-ahead it is feeling great and I think I don't need to move swapspace to microsd!!