![]() |
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Quote:
|
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Quote:
This is simple logic. If Symbian OR Maemo had been competitive, there would be no need for Elop, there would be no need for WP. Instead of making them competitive they tried to put on some Qt makeup. That didn't work. |
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
The maemo/meego team is now at Jolla. Their track record makes me highly doubtful that they can succeed
|
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Quote:
period |
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Quote:
|
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Nothing to do with Elop. N900 was out in 2009, They should have had the device for N9 ready by 2010......with development since at least 2007....
|
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Quote:
That... was the case and that led to the current situation where Microsoft is still their push in terms of marketing and press releases and Maemo/MeeGo and Symbian are all pushed to the wayside. Blaming Elop is only looking at what he had left to deal with in regards to the undervalued, underfunded yet pretty damn driven Maemo/MeeGo teams that have gone to Jolla and other places. Qt has been purchased by Digia and that means that it will invariably not have the funding that a healthier Nokia could have given it. So Tomi Ahonen roasting Elop's decisions - nothing new. He'd probably roast OPK too if he hadn't in the past (I seriously don't know). And pretty much he'd roast anybody else making decisions not named Tomi Ahonen. Being number 1 doesn't mean you're infallible. It means you have further to fall down... |
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
I think Elop did what he had to do.... we shouldn't roast him.
We should be roasting the board of executives. If Nokia didn't strike the deal with Microsoft, I'm certain RIM would've done it shortly thereafter. Then you'd have Microsoft with a stronger patent portfolio, a communications service, a hardware vendor and a foot into the corporate world. In fact, Windows 8 would be something to look forward to. If anything, I think it was Intel that killed Nokia. Maemo5 was good (is good). Starting over with .rpm and Qt5 is better, yes, but NOT in the scale of time they did it. I think the best alternative would've been if they shipped Symbian Anna/Belle with the Nokia N8 and did so at least 6 months prior. That would've been the "stop gap". And in the meantime, buy out Palm, have extensive patent portfolio to litigate Apple (yes I actually support this), and churn out Maemo5OS-with-webOS-UX and devices that are "good enough" to compete in the market. I think in the meantime, Nokia could've been creating a powerful successor with the latest stable Linux kernel, rpm package system and Qt5-framework. They could've bumped up the UX again and offer upgrades for "worthy" devices. Sure it would've pissed off a lot of people, but you have to think about yourself first. While Apple was selling the iPhone 4S and iPad 2, Nokia could've been selling a tablet like the ASUS Transformer and a phone like Google Nexus Galaxy... which may have been short of "Apps" but it would be more "revolutionary" and with a bright future with Applications. The Samsung Galaxy S i9000 was the "make it or break it" point in time for the industry. This is where Nokia, Palm, RIM and Microsoft all went wrong. |
Re: Must read! Tomi Ahonen roasts Elop's decisions
Quote:
Also, the Harmattan programme getting so damn late that it sucked up all the people that were needed to really kickstart on MW/UI side for handsets, a multi-device strategy with MeeGo.com, hindering real progress. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8