maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   [Closed - Leaked PR1.2] Info and Discussion thread (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=51713)

gerbick 2010-05-03 10:53

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slender (Post 640071)
People should take responsibility of their own actions.

Quoted for emphasis.

gerbick 2010-05-03 10:54

Re: how old is the leaked pr 1.2 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ste-phan (Post 640064)
@gerbick: One harmless answer might have been.. I think I love you baby, after PR1.3 gets released I am all yours :D

Lord. At this rate, she'll be over the hill before that happens ;)

Venemo 2010-05-03 10:57

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vickyg (Post 640016)
for god sake this is open source world there is noting called "leaked" in opensource world. If nokia want to keep such secrets then it will be better to stick with there crap phone. why the hell they released a Opensource phone when they don't understand what opensource is..

You can download its source, and stuff, of the open source components from their source code repositories.

You can even download the binaries from the SDK repository.

However, the fact that it is open source, doesn't mean that people should be messing around with it.
At least, no end users.

jakiman 2010-05-03 10:58

Re: how old is the leaked pr 1.2 ?
 
MR0 to me sounds like Maintenance Release 0.

ysss 2010-05-03 11:00

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jakiman (Post 640066)
This analogy does not work well.

This leaked fw was newer and with more fixes and enhancements than PR 1.1.1. So maybe you should say it was cooked properly but "possibly" with some stale ingredients. To me, it tasted just fine with no stomach aches even after 24 hours.

N900 was near raw when released. PR 1.1.1 is still a little undercooked. This leaked firmware is better cooked imho. I know coz I've tasted it myself. From this experience, I've learned that official build of PR1.2 will be quite a tasty meal. :p

More features != more mature.

A big part of quality assurance is to make sure that all the new components (newly merged codebranches, etc) can work together well and test them in as many situations as possible.

We don't even know the exact testing platforms used. Perhaps the test phones have certain features (or lack thereof) that makes it easier to reflash or getaround certain issues, so they leave out the safeties.

Etc.

jakiman 2010-05-03 11:00

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
I thought N900 isn't a 100% open source phone. (I believe quite a few areas are closed source. Drivers etc)

oved_etzot 2010-05-03 11:00

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Let me phrase the question differently- just as "food for thought" for all those critical of the OP.
How many of you, that didn't flash their phones - because they are responsible people - followed the threads of those who did, in order to try and see whether it worked and what is good and bad about FW1.2?
If you did, aren't you building on the experience and gumption of those who had the guts to try? Are you hoping that any bugs that were exposed by those who tried will be fixed by Nokia before the release?
So why be self-righteous?

Venemo 2010-05-03 11:04

Re: how old is the leaked pr 1.2 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by volt (Post 640033)
The way I read the firmware version number here is, like Venemo suggests:

RX-51_2009SE_10. 2010 Week 12 Build 9 Public Release... I have no idea what MR stands for but MR0 would be something like Mobile/Marketing Region 0 - Global.

However, the date you found would suggest week 10.

Actually, no matter if it is 11 or 12. It was ~2 months ago.

CONCLUSION: It is not the RC as most people believe it is, but more likely one of the alpha, or early beta builds.

I'm not trying it.
BTW, stuff like this is the BEST way for hackers to embed trojans, keyloggers, and other sh*t.
(At least, if I were an evil person, this is exacly how I would do it.)

(The same applies for the pirated versions of Windows coming from unknown sources. Most of them are full of malware.)

tswindell 2010-05-03 11:06

Re: How old is the leaked PR1.2?
 
Well, if you look at the firmware downloads @ nokia (tablets-dev.nokia.com) you'll see that all the Global releases are MR0 and the others are XXX. So I'd say volt's assumption at least appears correct.

zehjotkah 2010-05-03 11:06

Re: How old is the leaked PR1.2?
 
gerbick, I had a similar experience, but in my case "she" wasn't too young, but a shemale. ^^

h3llraz0r 2010-05-03 11:07

Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by giannoug (Post 640054)
As a side note, my N900 is extremely fast, running really well and also NEVER crashed. Oh, I'm running PR1.2 @ 1Ghz and I'm going to 1150Mhz today (500Mhz min).

I also restored a backup from PR1.1.1. Everything works like a charm.
I knew what I did, if you don't then buy an iPhone or whatever. Stop making these stupid posts.They have nothing to give to the
community.


^ exactly

Noone forced you to install the leaked, stolen, missing, whatever and fake binary. Also, don't forget to make a byby thread.

/rant

I know noone forced me but I did it anyways despite the warnings and I'm responsible for the consequences related to the upgrade.

So what's your point?


http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Now I can't point out the lines that make you sound clueless because they're all pretty good contenders. You're obviously a guy who doesn't know what he's doing (nor saying!) :)

If you read the thread carefuly, I clearly asked a question to have an idea of how the community was expecting PR1.2 to be. If you have a problem against me because you feel insulted by my threads then I apologize in advance and invite you keep doing what you do best and use your overclocking "skills" to boost that slow mind of yours.

My phone runs at 600mhz but would probably get more things done than that useless burning brick of yours.

jakiman 2010-05-03 11:08

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ysss (Post 640086)
More features != more mature.

A big part of quality assurance is to make sure that all the new components (newly merged codebranches, etc) can work together well and test them in as many situations as possible.

We don't even know the exact testing platforms used. Perhaps the test phones have certain features (or lack thereof) that makes it easier to reflash or getaround certain issues, so they leave out the safeties.

Etc.

I also work in a software company and know what's involved.
Every software released is buggy. Official PR 1.2 will be buggy.

So far, I've tried every major stuff that I do with my N900 and found no problems yet.
I can confidently say that PR 1.1.1 was buggier than this leaked firmware so far.
If I do find something which makes my N900 useless (which there isn't), I'll post it at TMO and warn others.

Venemo 2010-05-03 11:10

Re: Is the leaked PR1.2 RC disappointing?
 
The title of this thread is WRONG.

The recently leaked version is NOT an RC, as we concluded in this thread. It is more likely an alpha, or an early beta version.

eitama 2010-05-03 11:11

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Larswad (Post 640038)
I believe OP is talking about attitude here and I can understand his point of view, there is no need to bash the people who flashed their devices with the RC. Maybe even some of them had no idea about the dangers and problems that could arise. Maybe they thought it wasn't much of a big deal at all taking a firmware that has leaked prior to release.
So, even if you're not in to help out here, maybe you could just keep from gloating at someone else's misery. Because that's not the spirit that we should keep in this open community, is it?

It's up to each person what to do. Personally I even wait a little while to see what happens when authorized public updates arrive, how the reactions are so that I know what will happen when I update. But I wouldn't blame or jump on anyone that goes right ahead updating.

Heh. Only 1 Person really understood my point.
Maybe the wording for the topic was wrong, my English level sometimes challenges me.

For those who wrote that I am wasting your time when you would have been able to be working on other projects for the community,
I am not asking anyone to sit at their computer for hours or even 10s of minutes and figure out why this and that is not working for me cause of PR1.2 (Leaked). I was again, talking about the reactions of people to other N900 users seeking for help, if you already know the solution, posting it take 2 minutes max.
Forgive me for wasting 2 minutes of your time.

andybehr 2010-05-03 11:11

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
What the f#*! is going on here!

Where is all this anger coming from? Really what have we become?

First I want to say, I jailbroke my iPhone years ago and it broke. So I know how dangerous it is to install unapproved software on a phone.

Let's for a second or two forget the fact, that this came from an unknown and dodgy source. Let's assume we downloaded it straight from a Nokia server. How would we treat people with problems? Tell to go f#ck themselves because it is just a beta version? Probably not, or so I hope. So I say to PR1.2 installers: "You've been very naughty, but now let's see how I can help you."


Which brings me to another point. Why is there not an offical Nokia beta version fo 1.2?? Even Apple is making beta versions of the OS available to the developers. And yes they say if it breaks you are on your own. So if an extremly closes company like Apple can provide a beta for developers, why can't Nokia? I can't be trade secrets, it is mostly open source, and it is available in the SDK anyways... It can't be the users/developers, or does Nokia think we cannot handle a beta version but an Apple user can??? I said it before and I will say it again> Nokia needs to communicate better with us. Be more open! Tell us what is going on. Where is the roadmap/release plan? Put it in the developer section of this website, We know that this things a not set in stone. But we get nothing for all we know offical PR1.2 could be released tonight or in two months. Is it in testing? Maybe. We have hints but nothing offical.

On to the next thing. Why does it take so long between releases? What would be wrong with smaller releases that happen more often? (See WebOS with an release every 4 weeks) or at least a set schedule like Gnome or Ubuntu.

Right know I am unsure if my next phone will be a Nokia again. Not that I don't like the n900, I love it. But it is this false sense of community and openness that I find off puting.

Last thing.
I just read on Twitter, that 1.2 can cause damage on the device. I do not know if that is true, but this is then the chance for Nokia to shine and come to the rescue: Release a better beta version. Help the people how like there phone so much, the play with it all the time and even install untested software. Be the hero, not the do#che.

End of rant.

Andy

jaysire 2010-05-03 11:14

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eitama (Post 639973)
... with examples, cause we are not stupid people.
- And yes, there was an ample dose of STUPIDITY.

So, which is it. Are we stupid or not? I'd like to know.

Venemo 2010-05-03 11:14

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andybehr (Post 640100)
On to the next thing. Why does it take so long between releases? What would be wrong with smaller releases that happen more often? (See WebOS with an release every 4 weeks) or at least a set schedule like Gnome or Ubuntu.

There is a brainstorm about it, vote for it!

h3llraz0r 2010-05-03 11:15

Re: Is the leaked PR1.2 RC disappointing?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Venemo (Post 640098)
The title of this thread is WRONG.

The recently leaked version is NOT an RC, as we concluded in this thread. It is more likely an alpha, or an early beta version.


Title changed to Beta


Edit: Looks like the Poll's title took over and can't be changed.

eitama 2010-05-03 11:17

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slender (Post 640071)
I do not exactly know to whom you are referring by "we", but if you mean people who have downloaded leaked fw from torrent/mediafire/rapidshare etc. source, read flash guides, flashed device with this image, found problems, came here to post about problems and ask for help then i would say that yes.

Fo f sake. Do you install stuff e.g. to your windows from random sources just because you are bored. Do you understand what kind of security threat these people are? Huge. People should take responsibility of their own actions. Sometimes I just think that oddly behaving mass of users are probably just teenagers who have not yet realised thing or two :|

- We = People who flashed, and got into trouble, then asked for help and got bashed.
- Choosing 1 of the reasons I mentioned in my OP, and using it as a soul point for arguing, is lame.
- I am not looking for someone to blame. I am pointing fingers at those bashing others who took a risk.

Is your phone OCed? would you want help with that if something went wrong?
What would you think if you had phonecalls hanging-up 2 minutes after they started just cause you are running @ 900 MHz, and going back to 600MHz didn't solve it? Wouldn't you appreciate any help someone could give you?

Take your pick :
- It's your problem you overclocked, you should take responsibily for your actions, it's well known and written the OCing may void warrenty and harm your phone.

or

- Try doing this and that inside a terminal, or follow this post it should solve your problem.

Which one is better?
If you CAN HELP, why not?

fixfox 2010-05-03 11:18

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
It would be nice for a MOD to merge all these PR1.2 related threads into one.

There are way too many at the moment... looks like every question is a new thread.!

eitama 2010-05-03 11:19

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysire (Post 640102)
So, which is it. Are we stupid or not? I'd like to know.

If you look at the sub-header of that paragraph, you will see I wrote the reason why I flashed.

Quote:

Why did I flash to PR1.2?
....
- I'd expect nokia to get their act together and maybe post on maemo.org a letter of warning that irreversible things can happen, with examples, cause we are not stupid people.
- And yes, there was an ample dose of STUPIDITY.
But thanks, You are just stressing my point.
Rude, selfish & unkind.
Not what you would expect form a community is it?

Jaffa 2010-05-03 11:20

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vickyg (Post 640045)
Answer me one question do you know the current status of PR 1.2 @ Nokia HQ.

I know it's not been released. But you know that too. I don't know anymore than that. One could probably surmise it's been delayed by last minute bug fixes.

Quote:

When was the last time you came to know the status and what was the status of it.
Err, I've never known its intended release date or the rollout plans, or anything like that; if that's what you mean.

Quote:

Why it was not communicated to other members of community?
Communicating "I don't know any more than you" could get pretty old pretty fast.

As has been pointed out, we're a facilitation conduit between the community and Nokia; and - increasingly - within the community itself. We don't need to know when PR1.2 is going to be released to do that, apart from, perhaps a half-day headsup of the release so that we can make sure we're online to help answer questions/get the moderators moderating threads.

But I don't know if Nokia will give us that heads' up: we've not signed NDAs and they'd do it on trust alone.

eitama 2010-05-03 11:20

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fixfox (Post 640107)
It would be nice for a MOD to merge all these PR1.2 related threads into one.

There are way too many at the moment... looks like every question is a new thread.!

This thread has nothing to do with the others.
I have not asked a single technical question in it, and more over, it's inside the General forum.

crown77 2010-05-03 11:21

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
@Jaffa

I dont mean the 1.2 leaked release i mean the whole Mameo 5 Development just a little more Backround information why the PR 1.2 takes so long i guess we all could calm down then more but to know nothing is always bad.

*edit* but i just see that you told us a little about in the last comment so lets all calm down now:D

btw i also wouldnt install a leaked Release i did with my winmo tcom sda handy but not with my n900 where i spend a lot money for..

Jaffa 2010-05-03 11:21

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Oh, BTW, Nokia are starting to officially warn people off the firmware:

Quote:

Originally Posted by NokConv
Be careful! Unofficial #N900 v1.2 firmware on web causing damage to devices! Don't download! Follow @nokconv for official announcements


oskarmat 2010-05-03 11:23

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eitama (Post 639973)

Do I regret doing it? - Yes.
Do I think people should flame me if I am in trouble now?
No.

.

HAHAHHAHAHAHA oh my GOD! How long did it take you to write all that ! Looks like "memories of a loser" - you should send the script to someone. :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

Of course you're to blame, but I won't try to explain you why 'cause it's clear you have much more to be blamed for.

Jaffa 2010-05-03 11:25

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by crown77 (Post 640112)
just a little more Backround information why the PR 1.2 takes so long i guess we all could calm down then more but to know nothing is always bad.

Software is hard.

jakiman 2010-05-03 11:29

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaffa (Post 640113)
Oh, BTW, Nokia are starting to officially warn people off the firmware:
-- http://twitter.com/nokconv/status/13299314191

Good to know. I would never have found that warning if it wasn't for you. Well, they did warn us about overclocking also so I guess this was expected also. :p

Leaked FW made me more hungry for the official PR 1.2 as it fixes some crucial bugs which affect me daily. Hope they release it soon. :)

gerbick 2010-05-03 11:29

Re: How old is the leaked PR1.2?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zehjotkah (Post 640093)
gerbick, I had a similar experience, but in my case "she" wasn't too young, but a shemale. ^^

You sir... win. Hands down :eek:

ossipena 2010-05-03 11:32

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Larswad (Post 640038)
I believe OP is talking about attitude here and I can understand his point of view, there is no need to bash the people who flashed their devices with the RC. Maybe even some of them had no idea about the dangers and problems that could arise. Maybe they thought it wasn't much of a big deal at all taking a firmware that has leaked prior to release.
So, even if you're not in to help out here, maybe you could just keep from gloating at someone else's misery. Because that's not the spirit that we should keep in this open community, is it?

It's up to each person what to do. Personally I even wait a little while to see what happens when authorized public updates arrive, how the reactions are so that I know what will happen when I update. But I wouldn't blame or jump on anyone that goes right ahead updating.

yes and I am talking about the most stupid comparisions ever. why should the frigging "PR1.2" installers get same amount of support than people helping development of maemo.org dev apps?

e: and yet they demand to be helped with gazillion of "leaked PR1.2" -threads...

h3llraz0r 2010-05-03 11:36

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Nokia purposely leaked it to justify the delay to the community without saying "We can't release an update because we're trying to figure out how to make it stable". Nokia is most probably willing to take the risk with causing almost bricked phones because the ones who updated it would get the illusion that it's still buggy and they're still working on it so they would stop making bad press to the world that the N900 is a bad phone from its bad support.

lma 2010-05-03 11:37

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eitama (Post 639973)
I'd like to address the situation of people who have flashed to the leaked PR1.2 and now have problems going back to PR1.1.1

"Blame" is meaningless. If you are not comfortable with taking risks and/or don't really know what you're doing you should probably stick to official supported firmware, but at the end of the day it's your device and you can flash anything you want on it at your own risk. Please accept that you are very unlikely to find support for pirated firmware here, from Nokia or anywhere else though.

gerbick 2010-05-03 11:41

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eitama (Post 640105)
- We = People who flashed, and got into trouble, then asked for help and got bashed.

You didn't get bashed. A question was asked... and yeah. You're to blame for putting yourself in that predicament. I personally can't blame you, the allure of "shiny shiny" is a killer force.

But nobody is "bashing" you. Just that... well. Like I said earlier... for some folks from this community to support you, they'd have to be in the same position.

Quote:

If you CAN HELP, why not?
Good question. But let me ask you this... have you cataloged your grievances, shown how it can be reproduced, and documented it all yet?

It helps when you help others help you by being precise (just as you would in Bugzilla) with your grievance.

That's the problem. You'd not have the grievances if you had delayed your decision. See above.

But as it stands, if you receive help - there are plenty of others working on trying to sidestep the pre-released (leaked) PR1.2 software just as you. And when the question of "are we to blame?" comes up, don't get too upset when the truth smacks you in the face. It was an avoidable decision that you didn't avoid; time to man up and own your decision.

Stop deflecting. That's not helping you at all. If all of the pre-release PR1.2 folks got together, sorted out what they were all seeing, tried to work it out all together, who knows. Both the community and Nokia might be able to help.

But as it stands, trying to decipher statements being stated towards you as snobbish, angry, or whatever is personalizing a situation where it just doesn't help you.

I'm trying to be honest here... all of you, get organized. Really document what you see, what's going on... in one thread... and perhaps something might come of it.

Good luck. I truly wish you all success.

sjgadsby 2010-05-03 11:41

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eitama (Post 640111)
...more over, it's inside the General forum.

Isn't. Neither the N900 nor the recently leaked build of Maemo 5 are the main focus of this site. The focus is the larger topic of Maemo and the community that has grown around it. Out of respect for those community members not using N900s or any version of Maemo 5, let's keep General free of N900/Maemo 5 specific threads.

jakiman 2010-05-03 11:42

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by h3llraz0r (Post 640128)
I wouldn't be surprised if Nokia purposely leaked it to justify the delay to the community without saying "We can't release an update because we're trying to figure out how to make it stable". Nokia is most probably willing to take the risk with causing almost bricked phones because the ones who updated it would get the illusion that it's still buggy and they're still working on it so they would stop making bad press to the world that the N900 is a bad phone from its bad support.

I like a bit of conspiracy myself but I don't think Nokia did it for this one. If I was Nokia and wanted to do what you said, I would have still released the latest build. Then I would get some public feedback which is also useful. Releasing an old build is a bit too nasty. =P

oskarmat 2010-05-03 11:43

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eitama (Post 640011)

I fail to see the resemblance between aids and leaked PR.

.

Let's try another "resemblance": It's a bit like invading someone else's house and decide to live there, without any right of sort. And then blaming the people criticing you for what you've done.
Rings a bell?

Peter@Maemo Marketing 2010-05-03 11:51

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
I'm not sure whether this really needs to be said because it is self-evident what risks are involved if one installs software for consumer electronics outside of official distribution, but just to clear: The software referred here to is unofficial #N900 firmware causing damage to devices! Don't download! Follow conversations.nokia.com for official announcements.

Astute 2010-05-03 11:51

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
To blame for what exactly ??

From what i'm reading many appear to have flashed their 900's with what appears to be a questionable version of claimed PR1.2.

From this end i'm quite happy waiting for something more official and living with my device in it's legitimate form as it is is today.

As always, patience is a virtue ;)

Peter@Maemo Marketing 2010-05-03 11:55

Re: How old is the leaked PR1.2?
 
I'm not sure whether this really needs to be said because it is self-evident what risks are involved if one installs software for consumer electronics outside of official distribution, but just to clear: The software referred here to is unofficial #N900 firmware causing damage to devices! Don't download! Follow conversations.nokia.com for official announcements.

Corwin 2010-05-03 11:55

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter@Maemo Marketing (Post 640144)
I'm not sure whether this really needs to be said because it is self-evident what risks are involved if one installs software for consumer electronics outside of official distribution, but just to clear: The software referred here to is unofficial #N900 firmware causing damage to devices! Don't download! Follow conversations.nokia.com for official announcements.

Thanks a lot for the comment, Peter. Could you be more specific with 'is damaging devices', though? We are techie enough to understand :)

Best regards,
Corwin


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:20.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8