maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   Glad there is no universal portrait support (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=32066)

Soulfarmer 2009-09-28 18:05

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by christexaport (Post 335429)
I don't give a flip. I'm here for me, and not you.

Maybe slightly out of context, but I read in some of your posts that you are an ambassador, advocate and what not. I got the impression that you want to help others. What I quoted from you doesn't seem like something one would say and still appear helpful to others.

If I start a thread about how I like Coke more than Pepsi and you start a thread about how you like Pepsi more, would you like me to come around the Pepsi thread and talk about how much better Coke is?

And I know you are trying to help others, no question about it, but your fire seems to catch others on fire more than keep them warm in the cold.

Texrat 2009-09-28 18:05

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by christexaport (Post 335058)
texrat, you have to avoid the qwerty keyboard and use predictive for a month or two, and I bet you exceed anything you can do with mini qwerty. I learned years ago, and haven't looked back. But if you work with qwerty everyday, it makes it hard to switch all of the time. But its proven tech as far as I'm concerned.

Tried and failed. I put a lot of time and effort into making T9 work for me. No go. It was wrong more than it was right and I lost patience with teaching it.

Everyone is different, Chris. What works for one does not necessarily work for all.

lcuk 2009-09-28 18:06

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Am I now the only one incredibly thirsty?

Texrat 2009-09-28 18:10

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lcuk (Post 335439)
Am I now the only one incredibly thirsty?

Popcorn will do that to you Gary. :D

lcuk 2009-09-28 18:19

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
nahhh, its just I'd like a nice cold glass of dandelion & burdock :)
its what I think of everytime I hear about the coke/pepsi challenge thing

chris, we hear ya, you have an interesting background and a decent perspective on the landscape.
please realise things cant change instantly, but i think your message got through :)

lets get over this discussion and onto the best parts of the newly revamped super smart internet tablet range :)

allnameswereout 2009-09-28 18:32

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by christexaport (Post 335058)
texrat, you have to avoid the qwerty keyboard and use predictive for a month or two, and I bet you exceed anything you can do with mini qwerty.

I just can't get used to it, else I would have gotten Nokia E51 instead of Nokia E71. If you prefer tthis though that is a N900 disadvantage for you on hardware level.

I believe a QWERTY keyboard with Fn option will eventually be faster than T9 after you 'used it for a month or two'. With predictive on. Because you need to give both equal learning curve, and the special characters you can use use faster than with T9.

allnameswereout 2009-09-28 18:50

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JayOnThaBeat (Post 335177)
<passing.opinion>
If you're too busy to free up both of your hands, you are too busy to
type on your device.
</passing.opinion>

There are use-case examples pointing to contrary ie. if one has something in one hand one cannot detach (metro, dog, baby) while posture is stable enough to focus on mobile device + using input on it with one hand (as possible with e.g. Nokia E71).

Quote:

Originally Posted by anidel (Post 335250)
I usually think when writing. Think about what to write.

Most people don't think before they type. To understand their way of behaviour as experiment use amphetamine in combination with writing. Helps against writers block too. ;) kidding, its a good point, but not 'universal'. If you know exactly what to write you're gonna need care for max speed. Err. Hmm. :confused:

christexaport 2009-09-28 19:24

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 335445)
Popcorn will do that to you Gary. :D

Who's smoking corn?

christexaport 2009-09-28 19:26

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by allnameswereout (Post 335486)
There are use-case examples pointing to contrary ie. if one has something in one hand one cannot detach (metro, dog, baby) while posture is stable enough to focus on mobile device + using input on it with one hand (as possible with e.g. Nokia E71).

Most people don't think before they type. To understand their way of behaviour as experiment use amphetamine in combination with writing. Helps against writers block too. ;) kidding, its a good point, but not 'universal'. If you know exactly what to write you're gonna need care for max speed. Err. Hmm. :confused:

Look, if I can't say anything about portrait, why should you? let it go. didn't you hear them? Or is this just for me, and not the rest?

fnordianslip 2009-09-28 19:59

Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
 
Now I get it. There's one main use-case for single handed operation that nobody has mentioned explicitly. Onanism.
I rest my case.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:33.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8