![]() |
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Quote:
If I start a thread about how I like Coke more than Pepsi and you start a thread about how you like Pepsi more, would you like me to come around the Pepsi thread and talk about how much better Coke is? And I know you are trying to help others, no question about it, but your fire seems to catch others on fire more than keep them warm in the cold. |
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Quote:
Everyone is different, Chris. What works for one does not necessarily work for all. |
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Am I now the only one incredibly thirsty?
|
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Quote:
|
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
nahhh, its just I'd like a nice cold glass of dandelion & burdock :)
its what I think of everytime I hear about the coke/pepsi challenge thing chris, we hear ya, you have an interesting background and a decent perspective on the landscape. please realise things cant change instantly, but i think your message got through :) lets get over this discussion and onto the best parts of the newly revamped super smart internet tablet range :) |
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Quote:
I believe a QWERTY keyboard with Fn option will eventually be faster than T9 after you 'used it for a month or two'. With predictive on. Because you need to give both equal learning curve, and the special characters you can use use faster than with T9. |
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Quote:
|
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Quote:
|
Re: Glad there is no universal portrait support
Now I get it. There's one main use-case for single handed operation that nobody has mentioned explicitly. Onanism.
I rest my case. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:33. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8