![]() |
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
why would you even WANT an n950 if you dont wanna be part of the harmattan community? are you gonna sell it? {wanna sell it to me?} |
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
The clarification, which we specifically asked Quim about this point in an open Council meeting, was that Council could not vote for themselves. |
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
Maybe I am not aware, I am willing to learn. Also why did the council members that get devices have a say in who got picked? I thought Quim explicitly said in the mailing list that if you get a device you can't be part of the group that chooses who gets a device. At this point it's clear the voting was not as transparent or to the rules as everyone was originally told. |
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
nvm, reading it now... Edit: the line and I quote: Estel_ Qgil, during last meetings, we agreed on method of handling submissions to CA, if Council member is also submitting. Popular request (mailing list, topic on TMO) was to have full council assigning prizes, just dropping voting about self-nomination (i.e. Sd69 don't decide about Sd69 being awarded, etc, but participate in deciding about other submissions) 21:09 Estel_ Are You ok with that? 21:09 Estel_ I've asked on mailing list, and You haven't opposed, but I would like to be 100% sure 21:10 qgil I have no opinion, it's you who decide 21:10 This is clear that it was left open, did you guys decide and not inform us? On the mailing list it was stated differently. |
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Community Awards: final results
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8