maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   General (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Another proof Elop is a trojan horse (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=74660)

danramos 2011-07-17 20:13

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 1052772)
The race was between Commodore, Apple and a few others, Oric etc. The IBM PC was extremely expensive in comparison, a factor 10 typically. But because of Word Perfect and Lotus, MSFS and so on, the only thing to have was a IBM or a clone. CP/M had nothing to do with this, at that time the world were all Commodore and Amstradt, Oric and so on while IBM was exclusively business. Commodore faught well, but had to give in eventually.

Somebody seems to have forgotten MS/DOS's heritage and why it was bought (aside from being a cheap and desperate need to quickly give SOMETHING to IBM after already selling an OS they didn't yet have, it was easy to port CP/M apps and commands onto... at least, originally).

Also... faught? I laughed. Hard. So hard, I nearly faughted. :) Couldn't be a typo--If you meant 'fought', it's a long way from o to a. :) Sorry, sorry.. it's silly, but man that's a weirdo misspelling.

Suggested reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP/M#MS-DOS_takes_over

mikecomputing 2011-07-17 23:09

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 1052772)
The race was between Commodore, Apple and a few others, Oric etc. The IBM PC was extremely expensive in comparison, a factor 10 typically. But because of Word Perfect and Lotus, MSFS and so on, the only thing to have was a IBM or a clone. CP/M had nothing to do with this, at that time the world were all Commodore and Amstradt, Oric and so on while IBM was exclusively business. Commodore faught well, but had to give in eventually.

wtf dont forget ATARI on this list :)

I remember bying my first 486 PC with windows 3.1 it was a ****ing downgrade from amiga and atari. Then come first beta of wiindows 95 and killed both atari and amiga. but I am still sure ataris os had a chance to win if not Microshit had marketikng windows like hell.

no it seems history will repeat and WP kills Meego and then Android in some year as mass market device in west.

but still I will buy n9 I will never buy wp****.

ericsson 2011-07-18 06:05

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 1052880)
Somebody seems to have forgotten MS/DOS's heritage and why it was bought (aside from being a cheap and desperate need to quickly give SOMETHING to IBM after already selling an OS they didn't yet have, it was easy to port CP/M apps and commands onto... at least, originally).

Also... faught? I laughed. Hard. So hard, I nearly faughted. :) Couldn't be a typo--If you meant 'fought', it's a long way from o to a. :) Sorry, sorry.. it's silly, but man that's a weirdo misspelling.

Suggested reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP/M#MS-DOS_takes_over

You are starting to be creepy, very creepy. So what you are saying is that my misspellings are wrong, they are not correct misspells. Well, I'd rather be the one with incorrect misspells than the one who points out the incorrectness of the misspells any day.

Forget about CP/M. Even though CP/M vs DOS is somewhat interesting stuff, it is irrelevant in the context of mid to late 80 - early 90 computer wars.

And yes, Atari must not be forgotten.

danramos 2011-07-18 22:01

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mikecomputing (Post 1052977)
wtf dont forget ATARI on this list :)

I remember bying my first 486 PC with windows 3.1 it was a ****ing downgrade from amiga and atari. Then come first beta of wiindows 95 and killed both atari and amiga. but I am still sure ataris os had a chance to win if not Microshit had marketikng windows like hell.

no it seems history will repeat and WP kills Meego and then Android in some year as mass market device in west.

but still I will buy n9 I will never buy wp****.

I was a registered third-party developer with Atari Corp. for AtariDOS (8-bit) and GEM/TOS (ST/STe/TT/Falcon) computers. I didn't really get into Atari's MiNT OS and Commodore's AmigaDOS until later but by that time I was already dabbling in Linux and the Commie vs Atari wars were dying down and PC's were the way to go and I started to really like Windows 95. :) Thanks for mentioning Atari!

Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 105319)
Well, I'd rather be the one with incorrect misspells than the one who points out the incorrectness of the misspells any day.

Yes, yes. We've already figured out you'd rather be in the wrong--even about CP/M and other historical and technical details. :) No need to point that out too--in fact, why WOULD you? You're weird, man. Weird. ;)

ericsson 2011-07-18 23:42

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 1053667)
I was a registered third-party developer with Atari Corp. for AtariDOS (8-bit) and GEM/TOS (ST/STe/TT/Falcon) computers. I didn't really get into Atari's MiNT OS and Commodore's AmigaDOS until later but by that time I was already dabbling in Linux and the Commie vs Atari wars were dying down and PC's were the way to go and I started to really like Windows 95. :) Thanks for mentioning Atari!



Yes, yes. We've already figured out you'd rather be in the wrong--even about CP/M and other historical and technical details. :) No need to point that out too--in fact, why WOULD you? You're weird, man. Weird. ;)

LOL, well what relevance is there between CP/M and DOS and late 80s - early 90s battle for market shares between Commodore, IBM PC (and clones), Atari, Apple etc ?

Besides, already back then (mid 80s) I knew where the world was heading - towards MS and PCs while others wandered aimlessly in all the wrong directions (Amiga, Apple, Atari) and for all the wrong reasons, mainly that of being fanboys.

Another thing danramos, if you don't want to discuss the topic, then at least stop responding to my posts. You are a millimetre from ending up on my ignore list (if this site got it that is).

Edit: found the ignore list, and danramos is on it :D

gerbick 2011-07-19 00:03

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 1053721)
LOL, well what relevance is there between CP/M and DOS and late 80s - early 90s battle for market shares between Commodore, IBM PC (and clones), Atari, Apple etc ?

MS Windows 95 was built on MS DOS, which was culled/modified from QDOS when IBM requested a DOS system from them.

DOS remained at the core of their operating systems until the WinNT kernel became mainstream - namely Windows 2000, which has further spawned WinXP, Vista and now Windows 7 as well as their server products.

It's relevant in the same way that Berkley Software spawned the paths that lead to all BSD based UNIX out there - GNU project included (inspired it at least)... which spawned MINIX and GNU/Linux.

Now, with that nonsense aside, the battleground included Commodore, Apple (with an UI), Amiga (with an UI), IBM, Microsoft and quite a few other players - Digital, WANG, Atari, Tandy, Sinclair and many, many others. During those days, competition was the norm... not so much now.

Back to the so-called subject at hand. Elop as a trojan horse begs to ask one question... how did the board of directors truly fall for the whole "ecosystem" sale pitch from Microsoft and it's not an environment that many people in Europe utilize, support or have shown to be able to access or shown willingness to get behind.

That's like selling fire to people in Hades (note: hyperbole).

meego99 2011-07-19 00:28

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by patlak (Post 1052628)
You really have no idea what MeeGo is? And what Nokia's planned ecosystem was? How much is MS paying you? You don't seem to understand anything anti-MS. MS is the holy grail for you.

MS is the best thing that happened to nokia. MS made a mistake of going with nokia. Nokia is a loser

jo21 2011-07-19 00:29

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 1053667)
I was a registered third-party developer with Atari Corp. for AtariDOS (8-bit) and GEM/TOS (ST/STe/TT/Falcon) computers. I didn't really get into Atari's MiNT OS and Commodore's AmigaDOS until later but by that time I was already dabbling in Linux and the Commie vs Atari wars were dying down and PC's were the way to go and I started to really like Windows 95. :) Thanks for mentioning Atari!



Yes, yes. We've already figured out you'd rather be in the wrong--even about CP/M and other historical and technical details. :) No need to point that out too--in fact, why WOULD you? You're weird, man. Weird. ;)

oh ATARI, no wonder why u so grumpy. you jump on dead platform alot.

i guess u now make apps for windows phones another burning platoform.

@gerick, board of directors is american blindfold one, the company success looks like more smart engineering from way on below them, rather their execution.

under their wing Elop sold macromedia to adobe, the guy have story of selling stuff.

geneven 2011-07-19 01:03

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Add everyone to your ignore list and OWN the thread! Or as someone once put it: "to tell your name - the livelong June - to an admiring bog!"

IcyMoustache 2011-07-19 01:51

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
the board of directors fell prey to years of brainwashing by the likes of McKinsey (who painted visions of future involving profit made from ecosystem vs profits from a free open OS.) Obviously that was biased given 5he consultants' own experience.

IcyMoustache 2011-07-19 01:52

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
*the (typing from N900)

shallimus 2011-07-19 02:11

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IcyMoustache (Post 1053773)
*the (typing from N900)

You know there's an Edit function right? Also works from N900 :)

It's been said before, but ecosystem (which is a real word which has been lifted from biology, a field where it actually means something) in this context does in fact equal locking down.

As ysss pointed out, making money from open standards is hard. But unless you're on the MSFT board or a major institutional shareholder, why would you be in favour of this "tight integration" BS? What possible benefit is there to you the consumer? The same things can be achieved with open standards without trapping your cash!

Yes, some devs make money from the Fruit Store and Android Marketplace... but most do not in fact make a fat stack of cash. It's actually Steve J and friends who benefit most. So if you wish to slam open standards, please don't play that card.

gerbick 2011-07-19 02:36

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jo21 (Post 1053743)
@gerick, board of directors is american blindfold one, the company success looks like more smart engineering from way on below them, rather their execution.

This is where I have a problem. Microsoft Windows Phone 7 sales numbers do not lie. It's not a big seller at all.

So with that said, it's just bad management.

Quote:

Originally Posted by icymoustache
the board of directors fell prey to years of brainwashing by the likes of McKinsey (who painted visions of future involving profit made from ecosystem vs profits from a free open OS.) Obviously that was biased given 5he consultants' own experience.

McKinsey... same Enron, Kmart, Swissair, and Global Crossing McKinsey?

shallimus 2011-07-19 02:38

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 1053791)
This is where I have a problem. Microsoft Windows Phone 7 sales numbers do not lie. It's not a big seller at all.

So with that said, it's just bad management.



McKinsey... same Enron, Kmart, Swissair, and Global Crossing McKinsey?

I'm checking stock tickers and market news for these companies, but apparently they don't exist. Stop making up stuff to scare us!

:rolleyes:




(Yep, that McKinsey)

gerbick 2011-07-19 02:44

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shallimus (Post 1053793)
(Yep, that McKinsey)

WHOA!! I did not even know... wow.

That... explains it all. Holy damn.

If Elop is a trojan, McKinsey is straight cancer.

Frappacino 2011-07-19 03:14

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
>> What possible benefit is there to you the consumer? The same things can be achieved with open standards without trapping your cash!

This is one of those "men are from venus and women are from mars" moments.

For the upteemth time - consumers dont give a SH1T what about open vs closed. They CANT be in FAVOR of "closed", because they dont know the difference. All else being equal, they will not buy the product with the "CLOSED" sticker rather then the "OPEN" sticker (and vice versa).

All they care about is this - they pay X $$$ to get Y if they like Y.

They will support companies that give them stuff they want for $$$, REGARDLESS of whether it comes from a CLOSED or OPEN philosophy.

Mainstream consumers will NOT actively fight for "Open" as they have enough **** to deal with in their everyday lives without getting into some abstract geeky religious war.

Getting mindshare in this day and age is hard enough - trying to get mindshare with an anti-sexy concept like FOSS is like tilting at windmills. I have better things to do with my life.

You want to push OPEN ? Start a company that releases products that embody a standard - if you can get these products to really SELL, others will start to follow (accessories, apps whatever) and as the controller of that standard, you can then OPEN it or whatever.

All else is empty hot air is whining about the lack of JUUUSSSTICE(tm) in this world.

shallimus 2011-07-19 04:04

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Frappacino (Post 1053801)
>> What possible benefit is there to you the consumer? The same things can be achieved with open standards without trapping your cash!

This is one of those "men are from venus and women are from mars" moments.

Yes, but you've missed the...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frappacino (Post 1053801)
For the upteemth time - consumers dont give a SH1T what about open vs closed. They CANT be in FAVOR of "closed", because they dont know the difference. All else being equal, they will not buy the product with the "CLOSED" sticker rather then the "OPEN" sticker (and vice versa).

Agreed, but you...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frappacino (Post 1053801)
All they care about is this - they pay X $$$ to get Y if they like Y.

They will support companies that give them stuff they want for $$$, REGARDLESS of whether it comes from a CLOSED or OPEN philosophy.

Uh-huh, and in fact I agree with you that the majority of...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frappacino (Post 1053801)
Mainstream consumers will NOT actively fight for "Open" as they have enough **** to deal with in their everyday lives without getting into some abstract geeky religious war.

Getting mindshare in this day and age is hard enough - trying to get mindshare with an anti-sexy concept like FOSS is like tilting at windmills. I have better things to do with my life.

Hold on there a minute Don Quixote, I think you misunderstood what I was trying to...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frappacino (Post 1053801)
You want to push OPEN ? Start a company that releases products that embody a standard - if you can get these products to really SELL, others will start to follow (accessories, apps whatever) and as the controller of that standard, you can then OPEN it or whatever.

All else is empty hot air is whining about the lack of JUUUSSSTICE(tm) in this world.

...and breathe :rolleyes:

Whether you realise it or not, your whole post is a naked & shameless straw man.

I never said consumers will fight for open standards. I have made enough posts in this forum and elsewhere on the interwebs where I argue that in fact they will not.

To re-iterate: what I am saying is that I prefer open over proprietary, and so - in my opinion - should anyone who:
  • understands the concepts involved
  • does not stand to benefit financially from closed/proprietary systems

For example: I prettymuch guarantee you're using at least some open standards right now. And open software. Like it or not, know it or not.

Or perhaps you prefer collecting hardware and software which together comprise one-off proprietary pieces of garbage which work with nothing else and become defunct within a year or two, prompting you to shell out more cash for a replacement which has all the same flaws but is a bit shinier...?

In the absence of any interesting news about the N9 these last few days, I'd say well-argued and reality-based attempts at rebuttal of my actual stated position are welcome. Good luck with that.

danramos 2011-07-19 04:18

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 1053721)
Another thing danramos, if you don't want to discuss the topic, then at least stop responding to my posts. You are a millimetre from ending up on my ignore list (if this site got it that is).

Edit: found the ignore list, and danramos is on it :D

Oh dear God, nooooooooo! Not ericsson's ignore list! Anything but THAT! I DID try to cite materials to point out more ACCURATE history to prove my point instead of trying to debate on his revisionist history... sooooo I suppose it's a badge of honor to be on THAT ignore list. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by jo21 (Post 1053743)
oh ATARI, no wonder why u so grumpy. you jump on dead platform alot.

i guess u now make apps for windows phones another burning platoform.

@gerick, board of directors is american blindfold one, the company success looks like more smart engineering from way on below them, rather their execution.

under their wing Elop sold macromedia to adobe, the guy have story of selling stuff.

Speaking of revisionist... You apparently decided to filter out the parts where I mentioned that I also touched on the PC and Windows 95--but I guess that DID die eventually, right? Aren't you glad I went with Maemo? Say--why did YOU choose to hook up with a dying platform? :) ...I mean, you DID say I seem to jump onto them... and here I am.. and here you are, too. HELLO! :) Oh the delicious irony of myopic debate. heheheh

Quote:

Originally Posted by shallimus (Post 1053822)
I never said consumers will fight for open standards. I have made enough posts in this forum and elsewhere on the interwebs where I argue that in fact they will not.

To re-iterate: what I am saying is that I prefer open over proprietary, and so - in my opinion - should anyone who:
  • understands the concepts involved
  • does not stand to benefit financially from closed/proprietary systems

For example: admittedly, it's hardware not software, but I prettymuch guarantee you're using at least some hardware based on one well-known open standard right now. Or perhaps you prefer collecting one-off proprietary pieces of garbage which work with nothing else and become defunct within a year or two, prompting you to shell out more cash for a replacement which has all the same flaws but is a bit shinier...?

In the absence of any interesting news about the N9 these last few days, I'd say well-argued and reality-based attempts at rebuttal of my actual stated position are welcome. Good luck with that.

Case in point in your favor... after a certain point, customers WILL eventually start demanding openness. i.e.: Here in Massachusetts, there's a big push (with lots of yard signs and an upcoming citizen vote) to MANDATE a right to repair law... http://massrighttorepair.com/ (based on the broader movement in the US at http://www.righttorepair.org).

Just saying... customers DO want it, and there IS a breaking point. (This isn't the first time.. this is why automobile OBD2 protocols were standardized and made law in 1996, too).

shallimus 2011-07-19 04:21

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 1053835)
Just saying... customers DO want it, and there IS a breaking point. (This isn't the first time.. this is why automobile OBD2 protocols were standardized and made law in 1996, too).

Cool - had never heard of ODB2, but it's an interesting OT read. Thanks.

My theory: informed consumers are more likely to make choices which end up benefitting them. A positive feedback loop.

jo21 2011-07-19 04:24

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 1053796)
WHOA!! I did not even know... wow.

That... explains it all. Holy damn.

If Elop is a trojan, McKinsey is straight cancer.

kmart is sears? we had a SEARS here. closed due certain bad management, then license expired.

danramos 2011-07-19 04:53

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jo21 (Post 1053841)
kmart is sears? we had a SEARS here. closed due certain bad management, then license expired.

Yup! Back in 2004. http://money.cnn.com/2004/11/17/news...0/sears_kmart/

jo21 2011-07-19 05:19

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Frappacino (Post 1053801)
>> What possible benefit is there to you the consumer? The same things can be achieved with open standards without trapping your cash!

This is one of those "men are from venus and women are from mars" moments.

For the upteemth time - consumers dont give a SH1T what about open vs closed. They CANT be in FAVOR of "closed", because they dont know the difference. All else being equal, they will not buy the product with the "CLOSED" sticker rather then the "OPEN" sticker (and vice versa).

All they care about is this - they pay X $$$ to get Y if they like Y.

They will support companies that give them stuff they want for $$$, REGARDLESS of whether it comes from a CLOSED or OPEN philosophy.

Mainstream consumers will NOT actively fight for "Open" as they have enough **** to deal with in their everyday lives without getting into some abstract geeky religious war.

Getting mindshare in this day and age is hard enough - trying to get mindshare with an anti-sexy concept like FOSS is like tilting at windmills. I have better things to do with my life.

You want to push OPEN ? Start a company that releases products that embody a standard - if you can get these products to really SELL, others will start to follow (accessories, apps whatever) and as the controller of that standard, you can then OPEN it or whatever.

All else is empty hot air is whining about the lack of JUUUSSSTICE(tm) in this world.


it have nothing to with being open and closed true, u can have open source store and third party premium working on ur same device.

only reason iOS managed to get it ecosystem because convince good third party to make contend for it. regardless its platform it closed. idiots buy the apps.. others pirate it.

it brings profits. market share low but u can bring hundreds on apps purchaces and people buy ur crappy device because to keep using the app (like blackberry messenger) they need a device.


and probably its the only reason blackberry is alive,
a few months ago i went to cancel my contract and they were trying to sell a bold 9780 for 800$ for a old woman probably around 50s. telling her in contract she could get it for 299$. her bold wasn't even that improvement. other camera. but she needed her blackberry messenger. simply she didnt know better.


the closed OS bits, its just to make developers fell at peace, people wont pirate it. or its gotta be hard to be, bad for them people will...people do...even closed OS like iOS or WP7

general idea of open source = free apps=competition, easy to pirate.
the good thing is other than games, every app and more hacks have bee done n900 han iOS-android put together.

reason why i prefer open-OS , u dont require company to fix it problems. someone else can.

my n82 will never get update again, but it music player still have database problem they never fixed or ever will.

danramos 2011-07-19 05:41

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jo21 (Post 1053861)
general idea of open source = free apps=competition, easy to pirate.
the good thing is other than games, every app and more hacks have bee done n900 han iOS-android put together.

reason why i prefer open-OS , u dont require company to fix it problems. someone else can.

Despite the fact that I like my Android devices, I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments.

misterc 2011-07-19 08:38

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 1053865)
Despite the fact that I like my Android devices, I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments.

too bad we still need NOKIA to release the darn device, huh?
well, as MeeGo is now "open-source" @ least, any other company may start selling a MeeGo device too...

hopefully with a mSDHC slot
possibly the only reason they didn't include it was to make the 64GB version attractive :mad:

danramos 2011-07-19 08:57

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by misterc (Post 1053936)
too bad we still need NOKIA to release the darn device, huh?
well, as MeeGo is now "open-source" @ least, any other company may start selling a MeeGo device too...

hopefully with a mSDHC slot
possibly the only reason they didn't include it was to make the 64GB version attractive :mad:

I, for one, look forward to serving our shiny new Intel overlords. Can't be any worse than Nokia treated us.

jo21 2011-07-19 09:19

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by misterc (Post 1053936)
too bad we still need NOKIA to release the darn device, huh?
well, as MeeGo is now "open-source" @ least, any other company may start selling a MeeGo device too...

hopefully with a mSDHC slot
possibly the only reason they didn't include it was to make the 64GB version attractive :mad:

well at least it support mass storage.

iphone useless without itunes. and wnidows phone 7 its worse with zune software (zombie platform):

misterc 2011-07-19 09:26

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 1053951)
I, for one, look forward to serving our shiny new Intel overlords. Can't be any worse than Nokia treated us.

Intel makes CPUs, video (in-)capable GPUs, chipsets...
but no devices, nope :confused:

well, if they only make the Atom family (under whatever name) mobile phone compatible, that would already be something. still wouldn't mean m$ would switch to it, neither, but considering the "platform" and "software" (3rd party as well as 1st party) aspects, it would make utter sense; in fact the only condition under which all that "3rd party software" babbling would ever make ANY sense :mad:

and would ultimately mean that MeeGo could run on any device LostDOS Paralysed runs on too :D
questionable in how far m$ would allow that.
then again, they get their $$$$$s when the device is bought, so why would they care what eventually runs on it, right?
and no more complains that an update bricked the device ¦-))))))
but no more $$$ trickling in from 3rd party software market :eek:

wondering :confused:

EDIT: the only reason why Intel would be better then NOKIA (is it, really?) is because they don't manufacture any devices themselves, thus they have no interest into locking consumers into one;
then again, once an Intel CPU platform for mobile phones is available... you'd need AMD (or NVidia or TI or ..........) to provide an alternative; same old story, all over again :(

misterc 2011-07-19 09:42

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jo21 (Post 1053968)
well at least it support mass storage.

iphone useless without itunes. and wnidows phone 7 its worse with zune software (zombie platform):

16GB, mass storage :eek:
whom are you trying to fool? :confused:
:D ;)

i can still use my N900(s) with the 8GB mSDHC i originally put in, but that's only because i ended up putting the MP3s on ~/MyDocs and periodically move PICs & VIDs to the PC :(

the iPotato 3G i got a couple years ago is used as "USB stick" on a pair of loudspeakers, but honestly? 16GB simply doesn't cover it :mad: (any more)
and if you want to start to install NITDroid or Mer or ............., well, it starts getting very tight, doesn't it?

EDIT: who was pointing out USB as being an "open standard"?
well, the rotten iPotatos are a sad example how even a hardware "open standard" can be abused :mad:

mikecomputing 2011-07-19 09:48

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by meego99 (Post 1053742)
MS is the best thing that happened to nokia. MS made a mistake of going with nokia. Nokia is a loser

yeah right! The winner of this deal is Microsoft! now they have acces to:

The best phoneengineers on lowlevel coding
The best hw enngineers
The best Maps
The best camera phones

list goes on

Now what will has Microsoft that Nokia is so desperatly needing? MIcrosoft crap ecosystem yeha

mikecomputing 2011-07-19 10:01

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by misterc (Post 1053936)
too bad we still need NOKIA to release the darn device, huh?
well, as MeeGo is now "open-source" @ least, any other company may start selling a MeeGo device too...

hopefully with a mSDHC slot
possibly the only reason they didn't include it was to make the 64GB version attractive :mad:

there will be no other company using meego on handset atm they making money on Android so why the **** would they go meego? In some years MicroNokia release wpsuck and the others will follow that **** but so when my n9 is rip there probadly is nothing for me.

Rauha 2011-07-19 10:14

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mikecomputing (Post 1053996)

Now what will has Microsoft that Nokia is so desperatly needing? MIcrosoft crap ecosystem yeha

Come on now. You are underestimating Microsofts service ecosystem.

Hundreds of millions of Live Mail users will run to buy Nokia's Wp7 phones. It's important to have your spam email-account and phone OS from the same maker.

jo21 2011-07-19 10:17

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
well in the end i think nokia will start making android smartphones by the end of 2012.


@rauha i am not sure if u being sarcastic or not :(

ysss 2011-07-19 10:28

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
You know things are extremely bad when sarcastic comments of past have come true.

2007: "LOL iPhone to rule the smartphones business within a couple of years? Nokia should just fire their current CEO and hire someone with desktop PC experience (SAY MS) to replicate Apple's 'suck-cess'"

misterc 2011-07-19 10:53

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
general idea is / are okay, but lot'a inaccurate details...

Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 1053727)
MS Windows 95 was built on MS DOS, which was culled/modified from QDOS when IBM requested a DOS system from them.

references, pls? :D

Quote:

[...]
Back to the so-called subject at hand. Elop as a trojan horse begs to ask one question... how did the board of directors truly fall for the whole "ecosystem" sale pitch from Microsoft and it's not an environment that many people in Europe utilize, support or have shown to be able to access or shown willingness to get behind.
and how could they let Flop (apparently) cast away MeeGo or state that the N9 would be the last MeeGo device?

hardly anything around NOKIA seems to add up lately.
usually the sign that something (important) is missing in the view of the topic @ hand, more generally NOKIA right now.
e.g.: a geek device without keyboard? :eek:

a bold explanation would be that Flop is a marionette not sent by Blamer but used by NOKIA's board for some "ultimate goal"...

Quote:

That's like selling fire to people in Hades (note: hyperbole).
Hades is the Greek's underworld, the world of the dead.
Tartarus was somewhat equivalent to hell, but lacks any fiery element until its romanisation.
hyperboles are fine, but try to be accurate pls.

bbin 2011-07-19 10:54

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mikecomputing (Post 1054001)
there will be no other company using meego on handset atm they making money on Android so why the **** would they go meego? In some years MicroNokia release wpsuck and the others will follow that **** but so when my n9 is rip there probadly is nothing for me.

Lol. You really think after this -> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07...ent_shakedown/

manufacturers are going full steam ahead with android as their only os? I think meego, webOS or other os's are going to be used more in the future. Android is going to lose marketshare in 2012.

misterc 2011-07-19 10:57

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rauha (Post 1054008)
Come on now. You are underestimating Microsofts service ecosystem.

Hundreds of millions of Live Mail users will run to buy Nokia's Wp7 phones. It's important to have your spam email-account and phone OS from the same maker.

i have my (not so SPAM loaded) frozen mail on my N900 :confused:
is that a bug?
(less spammy then Yahoo! because i use it less, thus it is less known...)

@ jo21 :rolleyes: ;)

misterc 2011-07-19 11:10

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bbin (Post 1054027)
Lol. You really think after this -> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07...ent_shakedown/

manufacturers are going full steam ahead with android as their only os? I think meego, webOS or other os's are going to be used more in the future. Android is going to lose marketshare in 2012.

Oracle is currently suing not manufacturers but Google directly for the unlicensed use of the Java technology (which it acquired together with Sun).
i don't think they intend to stop Android, but getting a (free) income from a successful operation is always attractive.
remains to be seen how Google is going to translate the charges if they have to pay :eek: :o

bbin 2011-07-19 11:25

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by misterc (Post 1054037)
Oracle is currently suing not manufacturers but Google directly for the unlicensed use of the Java technology (which it acquired together with Sun).
i don't think they intend to stop Android, but getting a (free) income from a successful operation is always attractive.
remains to be seen how Google is going to translate the charges if they have to pay :eek: :o

Yes, this is also true. Talking about free os :)

I think Vanjokings "it's like peeing in your pants"-comment is starting to be a bit more spot on.

One big question is still wp7. I personally think Nokia will not use it as their main smartphone os in 2012.

misterc 2011-07-19 11:52

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bbin (Post 1054046)
Yes, this is also true. Talking about free os :)

I think Vanjokings "it's like peeing in your pants"-comment is starting to be a bit more spot on.

One big question is still wp7. I personally think Nokia will not use it as their main smartphone os in 2012.

this is a FREE market.
they can offer whatever crap they want, nobody has to buy it.
and it seems that this is what it is turning out to be :rolleyes:

like i hinted @ in my post 434 hardly anything @ NOKIA currently seems to make much sense. could be a hint that we are missing something

daperl 2011-07-19 13:08

Re: Another proof Elop is a trojan horse
 
Since someone was wrong on the internet, and since you two guys managed to get the other thread closed, I'm gonna post this here, so eat me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by misterc (Post 1054049)
not quite, it seems...

thus still not "mass storage" worthy :rolleyes:
remains $h!t, sorry :( :mad:

What you quoted is true, in one form or another, for every device, but for what I was talking about, this is the only quote that matters:

Quote:

Independence for all iOS devices.

With iOS 5, you no longer need a computer to own an iPad, iPhone, or iPod touch. Activate and set up your device wirelessly, right out of the box. Download free iOS software updates directly on your device. Do more with your apps — like editing your photos or adding new email folders — on your device, without the need for a Mac or PC. And back up and restore your device automatically using iCloud.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:57.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8