![]() |
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Quote:
|
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Quote:
Quote:
People who do RPM-based systems like to re-invent the wheel thirty times instead of wanting to take whats already there, working, tested in public, and maybe improving it. They just like starting over for no reason at all. People who do DEB-based systems.. actually look DEB-based. So much so most are just considered to be "debian" based. People who do Slackware based.. also use the same tools and look like slackware. Same for any other distro.. if it's based on a package manager made and built and ran from an original distro: they tend to look similar. Then there's RPM and Red Hat. 100's of RPM-based... nobody wanting to look like Red Hat. Gotta all do something different... gotta annoy the hell out of me. *shrug*.. Life goes on and what-not. |
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Another way of stating that would be that only derivatives of Debian itself use the Debian package format, but that lots of independent projects have chosen to use RPM.
|
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Quote:
That's what I don't get - Why does every "individual" project have to reinvent the wheel over and over again? To what purpose? |
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Quote:
the very thing fatalsaint is critizing maybe ("reinventing the wheel")? |
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
FYI: the discussion on meego-dev has shifted from rpm vs. deb to
MeeGo based on some upstream distribution vs MeeGo as a new, incompatible distribution (current plan) http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/mee...ry/thread.html There are some plans to create Debian Mobile distribution http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel.../msg00428.html probably based on http://www.emdebian.org/grip/ |
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Quote:
Still, the discussion is even more stupid, since replacing yum with zypper is nearly uninstall one install the other one. Both can use the same remote repository metadata format. |
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Quote:
I've never heard of zypper.. though did decide to google it. See it is mostly for SuSE - which I don't use because I hate YaST. Maybe zypper is better.. but still: Yet another RPM manager. RPM is becoming the perl of Packaging Systems.. (I do love perl, but the "Yet Another Perl <insert>" is what I'm getting at.) I personally think if DEB+Apt and RPM+Yum don't do what you need.. then do it right. Start over. That's why I don't mind Pacman for Arch, tgz for Slack, emerge for Gentoo, Conary for Foresight.. etc. They actually built their own, from the ground up, all with their +'s and -'s. But to take the framework of someone else.. just to make your own wrapper for it - Wow how Lazy. (This is said with the full understanding that my pyPianobar is a very Lazy approach to pandora radio being based on pianobar which is not mine :). If Pandora Radio was open API, I would have started from scratch.) |
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
I hope they stick with Yum, if only because I am skeptical of things that originate or are supported by Novell. (Ever since the MS deal and until it expires.)
|
Re: Fedora based MeeGo = NoGo!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8