maemo.org - Talk - camera-ui2 (now a part of CSSU) (updated 09. May)

Page 12 of 114

« First

< Prev

Next >

Last »

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)

- Multimedia (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=32)

- - camera-ui2 (now a part of CSSU) (updated 09. May) (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=70870)

handaxe

2011-03-17 03:03

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by AgogData (Post 969357)

BUT when i type
- dsmetool -k /usr/bin/camera-ui2 (root)
it says [can't kill or not found, though its working]

No, you should not use "dsmetool -k /usr/bin/camera-ui2" as you never loaded camera-ui2 with dsmetool. When you have closed the x-terminal you can check what is running by typing

Code:

ps | grep camera

. There should be no camera-ui2. If there is then type

Code:

killall camera-ui2

. Then as root, you type

Code:

dsmetool -t /usr/bin/camera-ui

. This re-establishes the old default camera interface in a way that will have it auto-reload if it crashes etc.

nicolai

2011-03-17 11:05

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by handaxe (Post 969368)

The DNG develops OK in rawtherapee, ufraw etc. The exif shortcomings are probably tolerable if they prove not to be correctable.

tnx

They are correctable, I am just too lazy to implement it now :-)

Nicolai

AgogData

2011-03-17 13:07

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

thanks for the great camera app nicolai, i've created an beequeen widget to disable camera-ui and enable camera-ui2, so when i restart my phone i can activate it with one click :)

handaxe

2011-03-17 19:07

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicolai (Post 969573)

They are correctable, I am just too lazy to implement it now :-)

Nicolai

Oh yeah! As the preceding pages show, lazy is a real big problem for you ;).

I assume that RAW is a relative term here, as there clearly is processing done to produce the .dng. For instance, there is no vignetting of the sort that is so prominent in fcamera and thus clearly is a feature of the sensor.

geohsia

2011-03-18 03:31

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

I can't seem to get the RAW output. I use the keyboard and toggle r and no change. I only get the JPG image. I am using the latest build on the 1st post. I also tried the binary linked here

geohsia

2011-03-18 05:16

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by handaxe (Post 969368)

The DNG develops OK in rawtherapee, ufraw etc. The exif shortcomings are probably tolerable if they prove not to be correctable.

tnx

Was the DNG file just in the same DCIM directory? I did a "find . -name *.dng -print" but haven't found the files and I tried toggling 'r'. Do you know if the DNG files work on Lightroom? Would be interesting to see how well LR's NR / demosaic algorithms work on these files. I like FCam but the vignetting and color shift around the edges is horrible.

nicolai

2011-03-18 06:34

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by geohsia (Post 970032)

I can't seem to get the RAW output. I use the keyboard and toggle r and no change.

R - enable raw image mode
r - disable raw image mode
:-)

Swimm12984

2011-03-18 07:01

Re: camera-ui2 testers needed (updated 17.03.)

Nicolai...Amazing!

geohsia