maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   [Closed - Leaked PR1.2] Info and Discussion thread (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=51713)

santiago 2010-05-03 13:23

Re: Leaked PR 1.2 works on italian device! Screenshots 4 italian people
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Devyn (Post 640258)
useless & stupid topic. oh btw i'm italian too

r u italian too? meglio per te but the "stupid" word keep it with u

sjgadsby 2010-05-03 13:27

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640281)
...every developer who has written new software and set it up with the communities approval is in fact playing with fire because whilst implementing this software to the exsisting OS they are in fact re-writing some very important parts of the OS in particular the boot sector...

This is incorrect. Applications generally place files and/or symlinks in the root filesystem, and some applications do modify files that were installed as part of the firmware; however, it is far from true that "every developer" modifies "the boot sector". There's little in the maemo.org repositories that even touches initfs.

oved_etzot 2010-05-03 13:28

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640295)
Could you please read my post before yours and comment?

Sorry, I commented on Joorin's reply to you in the post beforehand.
I don't have anything to say about your last comment. Why did you want my response specifically?

zehjotkah 2010-05-03 13:34

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640281)
THIS is potentially very very dangerous and FAR FAR more dangerous than the update that came from within China.
[...]
This is in fact far more dangerous to the OS than the update from China ever was or will be and the very reason the update has given even more problems after flashing is simply because the OS has been obliterated in some or many cases from previous installs from this very community.
[...]
"Meamo"


First two statements: wrong.
After installing "bad software" you can reflash at any time and everything will be fine again.
After installing the stolen, unfinished update you can't reflash back to the official, properly tested and released firmware without losing the phone capabillities of the N900.
So that's far more dangerous.

And yes, it seems, that you're loving yourself (spanish: me amo) mister engineer.

slender 2010-05-03 13:36

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640281)
.....what has been going on and although i am no where near complete i will tell you a few of my findings ok and you i suggest you need to at least read and try to understand what i am saying.

I assume that you have read bugzilla commenting between bug reporters and Nokia employees? Thatīs pretty standard stuff.

Quote:

You have no choice but to agree that many people have started to develop software for use on the N900 and implementing them on this very community (i am on about the apps etc etc)
Who wouldn't agree that? Weird talking.

Quote:

, ok look at this situation and i will try if you will allow it to actually sink in, explain something very important here, every developer who has written new software and set it up with the communities approval is in fact playing with fire because whilst implementing this software to the exsisting OS they are in fact re-writing some very important parts of the OS in particular the boot sector and THIS is why the N900 has many problems brought on by developers OTHER than Nokia developers because they are actually changing almost every sector and even drivers in the OS of the N900.
WTF? seriously now dude. What's going on there? Yes we have custom kernels and rather interesting stuff in devel, but are you really referring that all/most/big/small part of software touches the boot sector? And why you think that is problem? IMHO right now it looks like right now biggest problem with Q&A in maemo.org is widgets and tools that use python and leave it in background. Spotting memory leaks on that looks like quite demanding at least what i have read from bugzilla commenting.

Quote:

THIS is potentially very very dangerous and FAR FAR more dangerous than the update that came from within China.
Many many people are having weird and wonderful problems induced simply by software THEY have installed from the downloads from this community, some of these programmes can and are potentially wiping out the the original functions of the OS of the N900.
This is in fact far more dangerous to the OS than the update from China ever was or will be and the very reason the update has given even more problems after flashing is simply because the OS has been obliterated in some or many cases from previous installs from this very community.
I am in fact looking at the overall developments being implemented to the N900 because everyone has been given the open right to develop for Meamo and i am certain 100% this was and is a huge mistake by Nokia to allow such implementations to be induced onto the OS of the N900.
I really dont think you have enough expertise to understand everything i am saying but i am sure any engineer will so please i ask you to try and relax and allow people to be free in their own opinions and do what they want to do, after all it no way effects you directly in any way or form.
FUD pure utter FUD. Could you please link to these apps that you find so dangerous. I have read this forum quite much and only problem what i have seen is that people are intalling stuff little to carelessly from testing/devel and there might be too little testers because apps go quite slowly from testing to extras. Also widgets and their memory problems seem to be hard to catch.

Lots of text from you but no facts. You paint and paint and manage to say nothing. You have seen stuff and you know stuff and what else?

Are you trying to say that giving user full access to their own device is not good thing to do? Because they do not realize that itīs OS/computer as any os/x, windows, linux where you have full freedom to fck up your system in many ways. May it be by installing screensaver from internet or install random stuff from net? Or what the heck are you trying to say?

rawutt 2010-05-03 13:42

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
wow..recaller start automatically when call connected on pr 1.2 L (!?!)...

abill_uk 2010-05-03 13:46

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slender (Post 640310)
I assume that you have read bugzilla commenting between bug reporters and Nokia employees? Thatīs pretty standard stuff.


Who wouldn't agree that? Weird talking.


WTF? seriously now dude. What's going on there? Yes we have custom kernels and rather interesting stuff in devel, but are you really referring that all/most/big/small part of software touches the boot sector? And why you think that is problem? IMHO right now it looks like right now biggest problem with Q&A in maemo.org is widgets and tools that use python and leave it in background. Spotting memory leaks on that looks like quite demanding at least what i have read from bugzilla commenting.



FUD pure utter FUD. Could you please link to these apps that you find so dangerous. I have read this forum quite much and only problem what i have seen is that people are intalling stuff little to carelessly from testing/devel and there might be too little testers because apps go quite slowly from testing to extras. Also widgets and their memory problems seem to be hard to catch.

Lots of text from you but no facts. You paint and paint and manage to say nothing. You have seen stuff and you know stuff and what else?

Are you trying to say that giving user full access to their own device is not good thing to do? Because they do not realize that itīs OS/computer as any os/x, windows, linux where you have full freedom to fck up your system in many ways. May it be by installing screensaver from internet or install random stuff from net? Or what the heck are you trying to say?

Ok you all dont understand how i came to this in the first place so i will explain, IF you can take a dump of the complete OS as it started from when you first got delivery then compare it especially the boot sector after apps have been installed you will probably get a shock.
One of the problems i see on this forum is N900's self booting and not a battery cause now why do you think this is happening?.

Joorin 2010-05-03 13:46

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
I'll break down your comment into pieces and perhaps you will be the one who "understands something".

Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640281)
You have no choice but to agree that many people have started to develop software for use on the N900 and implementing them on this very community (i am on about the apps etc etc)

Yes, there are many who develop applications for the N900. I did this too. This is a good thing since, apparently, having lots of downloadable applications sells the device to the fickle consumers.

Quote:

ok look at this situation and i will try if you will allow it to actually sink in, explain something very important here, every developer who has written new software and set it up with the communities approval is in fact playing with fire because whilst implementing this software to the exsisting OS they are in fact re-writing some very important parts of the OS in particular the boot sector
Eh, what? Pardon? Say again? I don't know how you did your "research" but you failed at it. Or, perhaps, you just don't know what a "boot sector" is and used it instead of something else. No matter what, your claim is patently and blatantly false.

Installing an application is not to write to the boot sector, it is to place files in a special place on a certain partition. No fire there unless you actually replace existing programs or you install a program that's badly written but this is always true.

Quote:

and THIS is why the N900 has many problems brought on by developers OTHER than Nokia developers because they are actually changing almost every sector and even drivers in the OS of the N900.
THIS is potentially very very dangerous and FAR FAR more dangerous than the update that came from within China.
Again you are wrong. Installing a new kernel will replace the drivers, that is true, but it's not replacing the existing files that make up the OS. If you install a corrupt kernel, the device will not boot, but all you have to do it replace it with the old one.

Reflashing the device on firmware level is something else.

Quote:

Many many people are having weird and wonderful problems induced simply by software THEY have installed from the downloads from this community, some of these programmes can and are potentially wiping out the the original functions of the OS of the N900.
And even more enjoy being able to do new things with their device. If they installed something from Extras without understanding what might happen, they're in the same boat as the reflashers.

Quote:

This is in fact far more dangerous to the OS than the update from China ever was or will be and the very reason the update has given even more problems after flashing is simply because the OS has been obliterated in some or many cases from previous installs from this very community.
That's a bold claim. Care to back it up?

Quote:

I am in fact looking at the overall developments being implemented to the N900 because everyone has been given the open right to develop for Meamo and i am certain 100% this was and is a huge mistake by Nokia to allow such implementations to be induced onto the OS of the N900.
Or this is the strength of the N900/Maemo community: to be able to actually expand or modify the capabilities of such a hacker friendly device.

Quote:

I really dont think you have enough expertise to understand everything i am saying but i am sure any engineer will so please i ask you to try and relax and allow people to be free in their own opinions and do what they want to do, after all it no way effects you directly in any way or form.
It's never a good thing to call people less educated and imply that what you're saying is too hard for them to understand when you, yourself, come across as ignorant and not very knowledgeable.

oskarmat 2010-05-03 13:48

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jakiman (Post 640161)

Analogy in general is never perfect. Mine isn't either. Let's just not do them. :p

OK ok but you failed to get my pun - I was referring to eitama - I'm sure he understood what I mean.
Let's only say that my analogy is more about him in general ...

oved_etzot 2010-05-03 13:57

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by oskarmat (Post 640324)
OK ok but you failed to get my pun - I was referring to eitama - I'm sure he understood what I mean.
Let's only say that my analogy is more about him in general ...

I understood your remark. It was geo-political and got by because you hid it in innuendo. A more explicit remark would have gotten you justified complaints.:mad:

fatalsaint 2010-05-03 13:57

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640320)
Ok you all dont understand how i came to this in the first place so i will explain, IF you can take a dump of the complete OS as it started from when you first got delivery then compare it especially the boot sector after apps have been installed you will probably get a shock.
One of the problems i see on this forum is N900's self booting and not a battery cause now why do you think this is happening?.

Would you mind explaining to me how my 3 python files in /opt fscked up your boot sector please?

Hell.. pianobar is a direct port from upstream compiled by simply adding the right DEBIAN file to the source code and using the maemo-optify available in the OBS for optification.... So please - explain to me how that is messing with your boot sector?

My guess is you actually mean Root FS - not boot sector. And if you seriously believe accidentally filling up your Root FS is more dangerous than a random firmware flash from some unknown chinese website... there's no hope for you.

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:00

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joorin (Post 640321)
I'll break down your comment into pieces and perhaps you will be the one who "understands something".





Installing an application is not to write to the boot sector, it is to place files in a special place on a certain partition. No fire there unless you actually replace existing programs or you install a program that's badly written but this is always true.


And even more enjoy being able to do new things with their device. If they installed something from Extras without understanding what might happen, they're in the same boat as the reflashers.


Or this is the strength of the N900/Maemo community: to be able to actually expand or modify the capabilities of such a hacker friendly device.


Please read your own words inparticular .....

"Installing an application is not to write to the boot sector, it is to place files in a special place on a certain partition. No fire there unless you actually replace existing programs or you install a program that's badly written but this is always true.

ysss 2010-05-03 14:01

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
I think he's trolling. Playing dumb on purpose.

Endri 2010-05-03 14:04

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Anche io sono Italiano e non ho riscontrato alcuna anomalia nel mio terminale sopo aver flashasto la PR 1.2 RC e non la eMMC...

A me va tutto alla grande l'ho anche overclocked con titan a 950 Mhz! :-)

Considerate perō che per me non č il primo tel ma solo il tablet...

Sorry for the non-Italian speakers!

YoDude 2010-05-03 14:05

Re: how old is the leaked pr 1.2 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 639891)
That sounds like my last trip to Walmart.

Sounds like my first wife. :eek:

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:08

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ysss (Post 640341)
I think he's trolling. Playing dumb on purpose.

Would you please tell everyone what your job title is?

Joorin 2010-05-03 14:09

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640340)
Please read your own words inparticular .....

"Installing an application is not to write to the boot sector, it is to place files in a special place on a certain partition. No fire there unless you actually replace existing programs or you install a program that's badly written but this is always true.

Ok? What's your point? The most dangerous updates are the ones that come from Nokia since they actually do replace existing OS files/change the firmware. A mistake in QA and you'll make life hard for many.

And why won't you clarify your arguments and reply to where you are called out as being misinformed and spreading false information? Don't you want to learn how things actually work?

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:12

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
One thing that has come across very strong on this thread is the very fact very few people agree that the leaked firmware should have been flashed to the N900.
Incidently MY N900 now fully supports USSD and the GPS works brilliant, for those that have not flashed this leaked firmware , is your N900 capable of dialing a star or an asterix?
Before you say anything MY N900 is working 100% better than ever before since i purchased it with absolutely NO problems whatsoever that i can find upto now.

Parody 2010-05-03 14:13

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Guys, isn't this poll kinda dumb? Of course it's going to be disappointing, it makes your N900 like a prisoner with the most girly hair and calls itself Bubba.

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:14

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Most of you lot will not even admit facts thats a big problem here.

nosa101 2010-05-03 14:16

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640353)
Would you please tell everyone what your job title is?

Engineer???


*whistle*

sygys 2010-05-03 14:16

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
well why is everyone talking about the chinese version... im pretty sure the chinese version doesnt have dutch language support. my pr1.2 sure does! where is this version from?

By the way for everyone who wants to know. the josh06 torrent also supports fm transmitting. just tested it

sjgadsby 2010-05-03 14:17

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nosa101 (Post 640370)
Engineer???

I thought ysss was a professional life maximizer.

Parody 2010-05-03 14:18

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640365)
Most of you lot will not even admit facts thats a big problem here.

I'm very glad that you aren't having any issues with your N900, but there are a lot more threads saying "My N900 is bricked" than "My N900 is now better"

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:19

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joorin (Post 640356)
Ok? What's your point? The most dangerous updates are the ones that come from Nokia since they actually do replace existing OS files/change the firmware. A mistake in QA and you'll make life hard for many.

And why won't you clarify your arguments and reply to where you are called out as being misinformed and spreading false information? Don't you want to learn how things actually work?

There has been no updates since 16th feb this year and the massive amount of problems with the N900 have incurred since they installed apps from this community.
I cannot clarify anything here simply because you dont want to even try to listen or more to the point understand your very own words ! .

fatalsaint 2010-05-03 14:20

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640380)
There has been no updates since 16th feb this year and the massive amount of problems with the N900 have incurred since they installed apps from this community.
I cannot clarify anything here simply because you dont want to even try to listen or more to the point understand your very own words ! .

No.. you can't clarify anything here because you aren't making any sense.

Yes, people have had problems installing software from Devel.

No, it has nothing to do with anybody's "boot sector".

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:20

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Parody (Post 640379)
I'm very glad that you aren't having any issues with your N900, but there are a lot more threads saying "My N900 is bricked" than "My N900 is now better"

And how many if any of the bricked N900's are due to flashing with the leaked firmware? do you even know?.

nosa101 2010-05-03 14:20

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 640375)
I thought ysss was a professional life maximizer.

But i thought the N900 was for engineers only???

You know, engineers like abill_uk

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:22

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fatalsaint (Post 640381)
No.. you can't clarify anything here because you aren't making any sense.

Yes, people have had problems installing software from Devel.

No, it has nothing to do with anybody's "boot sector".

Are you capable of taking a complete dump of the entire OS of the N900?.

sjgadsby 2010-05-03 14:22

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640380)
There has been no updates since 16th feb this year and the massive amount of problems with the N900 have incurred since they installed apps from this community.

I have heard that most of the people with broken USB ports installed software from Extras, Extras-testing, or Extras-devel prior to the problem occurring.

Texrat 2010-05-03 14:23

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640365)
Most of you lot will not even admit facts thats a big problem here.

That's ironically not true.

abill_uk, I suggest laying off the mushrooms and Red Bull. Bad combination.

fatalsaint 2010-05-03 14:24

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640387)
Are you capable of taking a complete dump of the entire OS of the N900?.

the fscking OS does not reside in the boot sector!

Fricking Educate yourself!

If you take an entire dump of the OS you are taking a dump of the DAMN ROOT FILESYSTEM.

Before you sit and argue with a bunch of Developers, Administrators, Systems Engineers (Yes, I'm actually using this seriously now), and general Linux Guru's at the very least try and get your terminology right.

sygys 2010-05-03 14:24

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
All hardware is the same in the n900. mine worked without a problem. if you download the josh06 version you still have radio transmitting enabled and everything works.

if people brick their devices its not because of this firmware but because they dont know how to reflash.

There is nothing wrong with this 1.2 version. everything works

mankir 2010-05-03 14:24

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Parody (Post 640379)
I'm very glad that you aren't having any issues with your N900, but there are a lot more threads saying "My N900 is bricked" than "My N900 is now better"

This is NOT true (on my opinion)! There are only more warnings from people, which didn't try at all. I nearly read all posts since Sunday morning, only found one person which has this reboot issue (which depends on something else, i believe).

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:25

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 640388)
I have heard that most of the people with broken USB ports installed software from Extras, Extras-testing, or Extras-devel prior to the problem occurring.

Problem with the USB port is bad design by Nokia and the constant use of it literally breaks it clean off the pcb.

But we will carry on this debate because i will make sense to even those playing ignorant.... eventually.

jsa 2010-05-03 14:25

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
@abill_uk

You may be a wonderful PCB CAD design engineer but I humbly ask you'd take the advice that's been given to you a couple of times already and brush up your knowledge about software in general before you start making these claims.

It's extremely counterproductive that people here have to spend so much time and effort on correcting you. Even more so because you seem to be a bit on the stubborn side and the patronizing tone isn't really helpful.

Please.

SirMuttley 2010-05-03 14:26

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640387)
Are you capable of taking a complete dump of the entire OS of the N900?.

are you? Given your choice of words ("boot sector", "rewriting") I have to wonder if you actually have any idea what you're talking about.

felbutss 2010-05-03 14:26

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fatalsaint (Post 640391)
the fscking OS does not reside in the boot sector!

Fricking Educate yourself!

If you take an entire dump of the OS you are taking a dump of the DAMN ROOT FILESYSTEM.

Before you sit and argue with a bunch of Developers, Administrators, Systems Engineers (Yes, I'm actually using this seriously now), and general Linux Guru's at the very least try and get your terminology right.


wow you made me laugh. goooo fatalsaint




by the way. PR1.2 has given no trouble today at all. also ive noticed the touch screnn is way more sensitive. wwoooooo

Texrat 2010-05-03 14:27

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abill_uk (Post 640395)
But we will carry on this debate because i will make sense to even those playing ignorant.... eventually.

I don't think we have that much time or server space.

abill_uk 2010-05-03 14:28

Re: [Leaked PR1.2 RC] Info and Discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jsa (Post 640396)
@abill_uk

You may be a wonderful PCB CAD design engineer but I humbly ask you'd take the advice that's been given to you a couple of times already and brush up your knowledge about software in general before you start making these claims.

It's extremely counterproductive that people here have to spend so much time and effort on correcting you. Even more so because you seem to be a bit on the stubborn side and the patronizing tone isn't really helpful.

Please.

Correcting me? no one is actually answering any of my questions and so far i have answered most of all yours.
I am patronizing simply because of the typical attitude from the replies on here.


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:23.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8