![]() |
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Quote:
|
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Symbian actually originated from Psion's PDA OS (EPOC). I owned various PDAs from the company and have to say at the time the software was way more advanced than it's competitors (whose hardware were usually "better"). It even had it's own version of BASIC.
I think EPOC was sold to Nokia & Sony Ericcson and became Symbian? The one stand-out feature of Symbian is that it requires modest hardware to run and is ideal for "budget" handsets. My wife owns a "Music Xpress 5800" and she is very happy with it - that was a year and a half ago. But she wants something a little more powerful. She says she wants a "proper" web browser, more apps and a "faster" device so she is thinking of an android phone. The problem is there is an overlap now between Symbian and a smartphone OS like maemo or meego. Users demanding more from the software means more powerful devices have to be manufactured. This raises the question of why install Symbian when the device can quite happily run a linux-based OS with all the flexibility that comes with it. Nokia's stratagy is fine 1) keep selling your "bread & butter" devices - cheap to make and software maintanence is low. Sell these at high volume - perfect for Symbian. 2) compete in the high-end smartphone market - feature-rich hardware and OS is flexible enough for power users. May not be as high-volume but make more money per device. Perfect for Linux-based OS If you want a high end phone then buy the N8. If you want a high end device then wait for meego-based device or buy something like android. |
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Quote:
Imagine the way you would pet a small kitten; now make that about 10x of a lighter stroke. That's what Topolsky was doing =D |
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Quote:
|
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Quote:
|
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Symbian may be great and yes Nokia cannot give up on earth when it is the market share king. But I was under the impression that Nokia had realised that the high end was where the big profit was. It is all very well selling a billion $10 phones and having super revenues but that did not bring in super profits.
My view is that symbian is not suited for high end touch screen phones. I thought Nokia had come to this conclusion when they said N8 would be the last N series symbian device. Then it became the last symbian 3 N series device. Then it became it may not even be the last symbian 3 N series device. Symbian is boring no matter how great it may be. People with £500 to spend see the flashy Galaxy devices, HTCs, iphone 4 and symbian devices and one of these has one heck of an ugly interface compared to the others. Of course that one is going to lose out other than those who just simply want a Nokia device (but at this price very few such people still exist). But it is with these £500 devices where the real profits are and it is there that Nokia is losing out to its competitors. N8 should have been a maemo 5 device. Then the E7, etc should have been symbian 3. Nokia already had its pretty operating system. It just foolishly abandoned it. Yes many will buy N8 with boring symbian for its super camera but so many more would have bought it for its pretty interface if it had maemo 5. |
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
For gods sake guys. I really dont give a **** about how great or **** Symbian is.
What I want to know is if the N8 is worth buying, and if Symbian on the N8 is stable good and most importantly FAST! |
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Quote:
Well, you should give a ****, as the N8 is the first Symbian^3 phone... |
Re: Goodbye N900. Hello N8!
Quote:
The Register has a 3 page hands-on article. http://www.reghardware.com/2010/06/1...a_n8_hands_on/ And here's a 8 minute HD-video hands on. It's C7, but that runs the same S^3 as N8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFNeJ...layer_embedded |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:11. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8