![]() |
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Firstly kudos to Nokia for sticking to their guns (and for the consumers).
But without carriers carrying the device and subsidized (in the US), it will be so many less people who will buy this device.. Lets face it, in the US, most people don't see the advantages of unsubsidized and unlocked uncrippled phones at all. They'd rather buy a subsidized crippled phone with higher monthly rates. But how come Palm and Google are able to get carriers to carry the G1 / G2 and Pre which I believe are also unbranded and uncustomized and not locked down by the operators ? |
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Re: T-Mo USA
Yeah, as an example, the Android on their G1 comes with GTalk and Yahoo Messenger clients that makes use of SMS system to send the messages and doesn't work over IP at all. |
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
If we are still able to bluetooth link up with our Nokia at&t phones on the n900 at&t is doubling their 3g.
http://hotcellularphone.com/att/att-...r-cities-year/ Remember those pictures of Nokias swiveling phone patents I put up here? Whaddaya know. The 7705 twist http://hotcellularphone.com/verizon/...ist-sept-13-2/ |
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
damn, i would really love to see that swivel phone with maemo running!
and thats why i hate those exclusivity deals, all the interesting designs goes to the carriers, while the rest is looking at generic screens, folders, sliders and candybars... i want a transformers phone! |
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Quote:
But oh wait that would actually require people to compete huh? |
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Quote:
Autobots or Decepticons ? :D |
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia: networks may reject N900
Maybe I would go crazy and choose the GoBots instead :)
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:08. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8