![]() |
Re: Nokia N950 vs Nokia N9
Quote:
We should have at least a few hundred commercial grade apps at launch, & even more non-commercial. Quote:
Everything management's doing/done suggests they don't want the N9 to be a success. So we need devs to be even more positive than before... Quote:
|
Re: Nokia N950 vs Nokia N9
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia N950 vs Nokia N9
Quote:
So long is the inbuilt functionality impresses, which I suspect it will. And there will almost certainly be many more free or lesser quality apps. Quote:
Assuming you're dev'ing via the commercial program, & not the community one. :D Quote:
As was suggested in Feb. as-to-why it couldn't be embraced by carriers. Always thought that assertion was overly simplistic.... *but from what I've read, I'm quite certain there'll be more than that. |
Re: Nokia N950 vs Nokia N9
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia N950 vs Nokia N9
It's the same construction used in the Nokia E7 which is really sturdy.
No way this was blocked by the carriers. |
Re: Nokia N950 vs Nokia N9
Probably has it already been said but flash support is available in Fennec! http://konttoristhoughts.blogspot.co...73851680035486
|
Re: Nokia N950 vs Nokia N9
^ No that's actually incorrect....
I doubt mozilla.og would pay the license for the signed NPAPI binary. We need Nokia to pay the license for a signed binary for their customized Fennec. This is what jolo is trying to convince management to do now. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:04. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8