![]() |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Quote:
Of course it makes sense that ultimately, of everyone trying to get the last word (wait for it)... There can be only one! |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Quote:
I think that was amazing too. |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Quote:
Ah yes, the power of crossposting is amazing... Quote:
...after completing the survey you can see your responses in copy-and-pasteable format. I know we all decided to "move on" but since you missed the memo and in a "roundabout way" you have become the "face" of those who do not recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible... Feel free to copy then paste your results in as many forums as you like. I think you will also be amazed how often your name will come up. :) |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Enough. I'd hate to have to close a potentially useful thread on the "user friendliness" of the site due to petty sniping.
Move on. Use this thread for constructive site criticism and ideas. |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
I know MF isn't nearly the size of Maemo.org, but we've managed to merge our two communities. What is the limitation keeping this one from having a single login?
|
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Quote:
Currently used software matters (hence comparing between sites is both useless and very complex, and not necessary or productive). There are several software platforms which are 'unaware' of each other which is precisely what SSO solves (on authentication layer, that is). Question is if it is possible to implement SSO [and which SSO framework] in each software platform. Meanwhile, every framework has their pros and cons. If that is not already complex enough, imagine you're gonna end up developing code which must be tested very well because SSO is related to authentication which makes it a potential weak chain in security framework. Add to that, the developers who'd implement are professionals with limited time available. You can read the discussions here: http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Single_sign-on http://maemo.org/maemo-meeting/sso-m...009-05-27.html Write less, read more, thank you. |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Just to add the perspectives of a new user. I appreciate single sign on isn't that easy to achieve, but having a consistent header across the top of the different sections of the site, containing what appears to be a single login prompt and registration button makes it really unclear what's going on and it's not obvious that there is more than one thing here to log in to.
Therefore if we can't have single sign on then it needs to be clearer to new users where the boundaries between the areas that need different accounts are. Alternatively a bit of extra information in the following places might have helped eplain what was going after I'd registered but still couldn't get into the forum: - welcome mail from the garage should say that you'll need to register for the forum separately - the "you have used x number of your 5 logins to the forum" message should say something about garage logins not being valid here and you must register separately |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Quote:
And for every hour I spend writing, 6 is spent reading. My personal rule. But thanks for the advice. |
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
600 posts is nothing for a big mouth like me. :) I posted over 3k posts on SF via my mobile only in record time.
|
Re: User-friendliness of talk.maemo.org
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:43. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8