![]() |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
i know this is a very serious topic :P but God's pictures and some comments had me in stitches. immature humour all the way
Grr why is the Nokia Store in the Departures at Terminal 5, means i cant play with the phone again on the way home |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
Let's look at the original post again ; "N900 is horrible" - Firstly, let's be positive, at least he didn't use the word "sucks"...
Seriously there are two seperate issues raising their heads here. 1) The fact that the N900 is a supposed "mobile computer" with phone functions, which is why it doesn't do MMS, portrait mode, and so on. Understandable. The rest of the quotes "step 4 out of 5" and "It's Maemo/Linux so don't buy it unless you're ubergeeky" seem to bolt themselves onto that fact. I have read, studied and researched the N900 since early October, and have no problem with any "missing features" since they can be added either through 3rd party software or through Nokia themselves. 2) The second issue (and the one which is making my next "phone" purchase more difficult) are the increasing number of bugs being reported - not small, hard to detect bugs, but major eight-legged fanged flying bugs. Bluetooth, microphone, messaging, rebooting, random calls and contacts disappearing. All reported on this forum. Yes, those bugs will be tracked down and fixed, but I for one will now wait until I see improvements. Big deal? Maybe. But i'm going to have another look at a Hero, and that could be Nokia's loss. Rightly some of you have said "Do research before you buy a phone". Well, this is research, and it's making me doubt. Those people who don't do research and spend €500 - €600 on their N900s will likely be disappointed. I don't think the N900 is horrible - but reports of people sending them back after a matter of days for a refund just shows how impatient people can be - but it does make you wonder who the N900 is supposed to target? Some people here insist that it is not a smartphone, due to having only basic phone features and therefore not going for the iphone/hero/palm pre market. Others don't see it competing with the internet tablet/netbook market due to the relatively small screen and small keyboard. I had a brief play with a N900 in Helsinki, but have mostly used YouTube and this forum for my questions regarding the N900 - maybe I need to try one out again to convince me. |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
Wow these threads are beginning to get me down. I think today will officially end my interest on n900 simply because of the uncontrolled noise on this forum.
I was looking for the next platform on which to move my whole company and was excited by the n900. Clearly that would a disastrous move for me right now. I will end my visits here with this summary: 1. N900 is an very powerful and exciting device 2. N900 is fast becoming a marketing disaster for nokia 3. The real problems are not all of the bugs people are screaming about but the approach nokia took to develop the sw! Clearly the community that developed this system in no way understood the very simple needs of their real stakeholders! They honestly thought this phone was just for them and are now insulted because people dare question design priority decisions! It’s that attitude that has helped me decide. whatever fixes may or may not come in the next few months the many many users who are screaming need to understand. . . your screams will be heard but the community still think your mad! why . . . (said in an very echoing voice as I run down a very long corridor) . . . "because its not a f...ing phone " ha ha |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
Quote:
But as more of us come in here that tone will change and Nokia will have to give more and better efforts to fix this up and add the missing features. |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
what i don't understand is why someone would spend five hundred pounds on a device without doing some research first.
its a hell of a lot of money to waste if you dont need it but there again i've been waiting for the n900 for about 2 years. if there was a device that could do what the n900 could do i would have bought it before. but there again people bought the iphone on mass.... but its "cool" the n900 isnt cool it does what it is supposed to very very well a fool and his money are easily parted (IMHO) ;) |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
Absolutely do not buy the N900 as your company smartphone, unless carryng a mobile Linux computer is your personnels pockets is useful for your business.
No matter how much some people seem to expect and want it, the N900 was never ever going to launch as a consumer-level smartphone. Maemo still is a computer system first, phone second. Next generation is announced to balance things out. Of course many of us hope N900 will gain more and more features through updates, but that's gravy. |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
As a seriously on-the-fence buyer of the N900, I can completely understand the disappointment expressed by others in the forums. I did plenty of research about the N900 before purchasing it (I actually had a good experience with Nokia USA) and still possess a Nokia 770, so I had some idea of what to expect, but I still find the N900 really lacking in execution. Now, that may be a good thing in that there is plenty of opportunity for improvement if Nokia (and the community, I suppose) can devote the resources to doing so.
What I really like about the device::)
So, having said all that, will I keep my N900 or send it back? As I said above, I'm seriously on the fence. I definitely sense potential here. The browsing experience is superior to other devices out there with similar form factors. The multitasking is also superior to other comparable devices. The biggest problem with the N900 at this point is probably that the UI does not charm me and there are obvious missing pieces that will hopefully be addressed by Nokia in the near future. Also, there is nothing particularly special about other aspects of the device. I will say that Android (my primary phone) seems to be getting better by the moment (although Android has some performance issues, as well). I hope Nokia can also demonstrate the same ability to improve Maemo. Right now I would rate it a distant fourth in the UI race. Summation:
I think I may keep my N900 and see what Nokia can deliver. My criteria for success will be getting to the point where I feel that I can forget my Android phone at home and just carry the N900 with me. At this point, I would do so very reluctantly. Nokia has a lot of catching up to do with maemo, in my evaluation. So, let the race begin... :). |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
A lot of nitpickin' over various missing features, bugs, etc. etc. in this thread. I wonder if anyone complaining tried using a very early G1/Android phone and if so, what they remember about that? I pretty much expected Android to be kinda raw and incomplete. It certainly was - and still is in many ways.
As for me, just got my N900. Still getting used to it and everything setup, installing apps etc. So far I can say 2 things... 1. No problems at all. Yes, the mic works, totally stable, very fast. 2. In a nutshell, the most amazing piece of technology I've ever held in my hand. IOW, I'm both very happy and totally rocked. I'll post more detailed impressions later in an appropriate (positive) thread. The N900 is one cool tool. Makes an iPhone/OS-X or a G1/Android look like toys for boys. Congratulations and many thanks to the Maemo community and Nokia for a truly revolutionary product. |
Re: Nokia n900 horrible!
Quote:
And I think if the point is to convey information it is a fair trade off to take extra time to compose instead of forcing your intended audience to take extra time to listen. The only real downside to sending a text is that inflection is lost, so you'd better take extra time to make sure sarcasm (for example) is stated as such. But that's where emoticons and tags come in handy!:) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:03. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8