![]() |
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
The N900 has a great Carl Zeiss 5Mp camera (a little poor in low light), but better than most phones in it's class. 32Gb memory, good sound and whole list of other capabilities. Explore it! Enjoy it! |
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
|
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
Come back here for recommendations, support and to have a good laugh at some discussions. |
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
if some functionality cannot been found in ads, and you think it is in par to other components, slap yourself into face and say out loud: "stupid" that will probably save you a lot of money |
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
|
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
I think you really miss the point. In my area, it costs almost the same money as if I would join one of those regular plan(where the tecos would throw in a phone for 'free') to get the data/voice service that I want with the unlock N900(or any other unlock phone); so how many typical consumer(as suggested in the OP) would really go out of their way to do it? That is the main reason why N900 'fails'. |
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
|
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
|
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Here are my thoughts on why the n900 failed. When the n900 launched it was 650 dollars when one could buy an Archos 5 and install sde (special developer editon firmware) and a smartq v5 for less money and you would have just as much hackability and openness, you could also buy a UMPC like the Viliv n5/s5 or the Umid m1/m2 for the same price. The n900's screen is only 3.5inches, that would perfectly fine if Nokia was making a mainstream smartphone but they weren't making a smartphone, the Nokia Internet Tablets were designed to be Nokia's answer to Archos, SmartQ, Viliv, and the rest of China, 3.5inches doesn't make a MID. Also the thing had smartphone functions, what but this thing is two handed like a MID and it lacks basic phone functions like mms? The n900 didn't have 4 row keyboard or 4.1inch screen like the n810 and there are many who like the n810 form factor so that kills a very large chunk of potential customers. The n900 was the typical lets cram 1,000 functions in one device and not try to make all of those functions work well (Nokia does that a lot), the n810 was the exact opposite that. What Nokia should have done with the n900 is a make a MID or a mainstream smartphone rather than trying to make a device that is both (Dell on the other hand was successful at creating a device that was both phone and MID with the Streak). My thoughts.
|
Re: Why N900 failed on consumer market ?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:26. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8