![]() |
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
You rock.
10chars |
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Wouldn't it be better to wait till PR1.3? It may delay it probably
|
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Quote:
|
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Oh, cool )
|
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
when I try to incept opensh it says incept: no such file or directory. Thanks to whomever points me in the right direction.
|
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Quote:
Did you try and incept opensh with /usr/sbin/incept opensh....deb? I bet one of those is stopping you. |
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Thanks for the response Arie and ye I did invoke pasiv with the given command and inception was installed fine with no errors. Yeah that's the command I used and still it says incept: no such file or directory I even checked with filebox and that directory exists hence my confusion.
|
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Quote:
Then try to incept opensh. |
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Quote:
|
Re: Announcing INCEPTION: Deeper access to your N9 [0.1.1]
Hello Boys and Girls.
Only a question. My situation is: E-yes Patched Dualboot Openmode Kernel INCEPTION 0.1 was installed OPENSH was incepted and installed AEGISCTL was incepted and installed Developer Update was done on 16.04.2012 INCEPTION 0.1.1 was installed today. /usr/sbin/passiv was run afterwards No I have in the Application list: INCEPTION (installer) 0.1.1 INCEPTION (sec. policy) 0.1 is this correct, or the INCEPTION (sec. policy) must be also 0.1.1? If yes, how I must update it? Best regards ExPLIT |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:23. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8