![]() |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
I think the framework is probably there to have a social feed like the N9 but it has not been implemented. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
My biggest problem though, it seems as if - and this is going to sound harsher than I intend - a whole lot of folks are using a smartphone, be it the N9 or Jolla, for everything but making cellphone calls and testing if the bluetooth works or does not. Same for streaming music via bluetooth - another major issue on the N9. Until that's answered, I'm going to say what you've received as an answer is not significant enough to quell my concern. Thanks for pointing it out; I knew it had been asked. I'm looking for an informed response and less of "I didn't have a problem" when it clearly existed. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
We should stop comparing jolla with n9! It's a different phone with different OS and completely different UX paradigm. ;)
P.S. And n9 is already a zombie . :p |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
gerbick: I totally get your point. Anything that is said now regarding antenna, bluetooth, call quality, etc. is only preliminary. I did read that someone used it with the car's bluetooth and it worked fine, same with Nokia 360. It is very early stages, but it is a beginning.
I already ordered my phone, but I was looking for something different: massive red flags, this is why I ask to compare it with another phone. I know my N9, I know my 5800, I am aware of a few others (e.g., Nexus 5 doesn't match N9's reception in the same low reception area, nor does it match the iPhone 4's). Again, these aren't thorough tests, but they give you an idea. In my experience the N9 failed with a bluetooth headset (or earset maybe, not sure how to qualify it) the minute I used it. The fact that somebody else was successful the very first time tells me that there is a possibility that it's better, which works for me :-) EDIT: since I'm here, it was also mentioned that WLAN was quite good, at least better than an Android tablet (but that's easy...). N9's is a bit poor, at least in comparison with a Nokia 5800. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
@kollin
I have to disagree with you - it is very useful to compare Jolla to N9 as we want to "measure" the Jolla performance&experience. So N9 act as a measurement unit - nearly everybody on TMO have had one, so saying something is better/worse on Jolla gives us quite good an idea. E.g. earpiece volume(said to be better on Jolla). |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
At the very least, it is very useful for me. Software-wise, I'm roughly with you - Sailfish will grow, there are things we won't have or we'll have to pay for (e.g., swype keyboard), but that's about it. It is a bit of a leap of faith, since if these guys fail, the software won't grow, hence I'm supporting them with my order. N9 a zombie? It's still my main phone, and I wouldn't change it for anything (except, maybe, The Jolla ;-) ), not sure what you're talking about... Now, back to topic, did I say that we need more videos? :-) |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Maybe you are correct if you ever use one phone at a time, I use at least 2, with the odd test here and there, some things you can tell straight away. I'll argue that the sooner you tell the difference, the better, otherwise you get used to it. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
@kollin
You can compare experience easily: call/voice quality? Speed of opening messages application? Easy of accessing essential information or functions? Smoothness/fluidity? Etc., Etc... These are all contributing to experience and perception of the device. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
I would like to know if anyone tried steam android and gmail android on jolla?
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Everything is quick and fluid with so far no slowdowns at all. It is as fast as you can swipe, there is never a catch up lag from the screen it is just immediate. It just feels fast and slick and a generation way ahead of the N9 in speed and fluidity |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
In the N9's event view, I can scroll through all my Twitter and Facebook posts from the last few hours - I just counted 79 tweets / posts. (This without having to open an app.) For me, that is such a powerful feature of the N9! (That and the N9's low power mode screen.) |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Does anyone have news if (preferably) Sports Tracker or any similar Android application work on Jolla? Hoping for Bluetooth support to Android applications.
I don't want to be pushy but I'd like to order Jolla for Christmas (the deadline for that is 2 Dec) and a little more information would calm me. In my budget 399€ is a huge investment. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Hello someone who got Jolla.
How long is USB cable and is it soft or hard? :p My N9 cable is almost in two pieces but still works. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Edit: about 93cm + connectors |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
The cable is 1m long. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
when you multitask out of an android app, does it pause?
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
EDIT: Sorry about the OT diversion. I would delete my post but I see no point now that it's been quoted so many times. To some of you I only have to say this: using the Linux kernel, gcc, etc is miles away from using GPL code. Just try incorporating a zip algorithm from Infozip into your commercial software and you will see what I mean. You are right, this does not belog here. My silly mistake. Sorry. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Ya i was talking about this. So no event feed :( |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
@pichlo, JohnHughes, benny1967:
Snippet from Sailfish EULA: Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
From a consumer standpoint, I think companies who think their business value is entrenched in their source code are the ones you should be wary of. They are the ones which pulls stunts on you like Adobe did with the "Creative Cloud" crap. I hope Jolla will open up the remaining code. GPL is fine. That does not mean they lose control - Google didn't exactly lost control of Android either. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Someone made video recording sample.
http://youtu.be/HhzCWzUa0ZE |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Quote:
Sports Tracker had a MeeGo version, would be good to ask - since they are also former Nokia/Maemo folks, if they are looking at SailfishOS for a direction for their software. Probably not now with just about 500 users, but something to look for when/if another OEM decides to run with Sailfish. I would imagine that part of the "features that didn't make it this version" is that of connectivity to activity/fitness trackers and their associated services. Of note on my end, I wonder if Jolla has spoken to their Finnish partners at Polar? And even if not, there's Rocke****ch which already supports the Pebble (and via my asking in that thread, could actually support several other wearables). Speaking back to that this is a UX, not a "wish Jolla had this" thread - there has been very little commentary towards the Jolla working with various Bluetooth accessories. I wonder if this was intentional towards this phase of the project? There are a lot of items which any one of us can state are necessary towards a mobile in its first release. Accessory compatibility, and even a sense of greater ease in connecting to them, seems like something Jolla has room to give insight towards their thinking on that. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Techcrunch just posted a huge article about jolla mentioning hwkb-oh:
http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/30/jolla-first-phone/ “Putting something like a keyboard is expected,” said Jolla co-founder Marc Dillon. “We are working on the developers kit so that anybody can do this… We're working on accessories, and we expect third parties to work on accessories.” |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Also I'm curious, if you open a browser via terminal, does it open a new instance? That would solve the browser-tab-reloading issue. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
While N900 has working jabber videocall, it is not encrypted and does not work through most firewalls. Jingle relay node on the XMPP server is required for audio to work properly between internal and external networks, and I assume that every internal network would have to have one of these to support the scenario where anyone could call anyone else, from everywhere. Unfortunately for example OpenFire's jingle plugin did not work at all when I tested it month ago. (OpenFire is used on the server I'm hosting.) XMPP audio and video generally is a pain in the bum, as it uses streaming port auto negotiation on specific range of ports, and uses only UDP for the streams. Most of the companies block both inbound and outbound traffic, cutting out all XMPP streams in the process. Skype goes around this problem by using any open ports it can find. In addition to this I suppose it uses, from the streaming view point, more technically inefficient TCP or TCP wrapper for streaming. Inefficiency is neglible when the network speeds are good these days. Again I suppose Google Talk uses the same method for their video call streaming. Common XMPP audio+video is still pretty much work in progress IMHO. For instance Windows client of Pidgin does not support it yet, and on computers only Jitsi client supports encrypted videocalls (and is a bit flaky especially in its stable 2.2 line). Of Android clients nightly build of Jitsi seems to be the only XMPP client supporting video calls if you exclude Cisco's proprietary solutions for their own gear. After saying all this I'm still going to test android version of nightly build of Jitsi (see jitzi.org for details) behind the firewall next Monday. It will be interesting, but I really don't expect it to work, as I can't recall it working on "real" android either. Of course I'm hoping that Jolla will get Skype and Google Talk video calls working too, but especially with Google I expect them to slowly move to their evil native and proprietary Hangouts implementation. And we are not likely to see that on Jolla (nor on any android fork). |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8