![]() |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Quote:
It indeed uses data transfer under the hood but the data is being routed differently than "normal" data transfer and therefore works without a need to have cellular data connection enabled. And this is the technology which will be somehow "required" in T-Mobile US and it is being integrated in many LTE networks all around the world. An equivalent for 5G is called VoNR (Voice on New Radio) or Vo5G. Quote:
P.S. There is also LTE Broadcast (also called eMBMS, for 4G) and 5G Broadcast (also called FeMBMS) for transmitting (emitting, multicasting) data (f.e. TV, radio) using 4G or 5G with possibility to receive data without any additional charge and even requiring the SIM card. But, unfortunately, it is not popular - there were just few public tests of these technologies. |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Quote:
People seem to have lost that knowledge; I'll say it just one more time: There's technology for mobile calls and SMS, usually called GSM, and then there's all the rest, call it mobile broadband, internet, data, whatever. Every smart phone ever built (*) has had (and still has) at least those two technologies side by side. (*) assuming part of the definition of "smartphone" is "internet capable". And if someone brings up WAP now I'm going to scream... |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Quote:
If an operator runs down the 2G/3G network and allocates the cell sites to LTE or 5G then you lost this capability. |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Slightly OT but what about e.g. all those emergancy systems used in elevators that have been installed over the last 20+ years?
Isn't it likely the providers just stop selling the feature to public but still offer it silently to b2b customers? Or will we see elevators get upgraded all over the US? |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
I might have to go to Alaska for some work, not sure though.
I do not look forward to having to deal with the doing-our-own-thing tech/contractual mess that is mobile service in the US/Canada. I think even Japan has now gotten onto the global mobile telephony standard and freqs. Will the Pinephone work there? |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
You know this discussion reminds me that as much as some don't like Purism. If they had a phone that worked well (meaning you don't have to think about power usage and heat issues), then their approach of separating the modern (M.2 slot for a baseband module) onto a daughter board makes a lot of sense ... as long as you can find or they sell a replacement.
Imagine keep the device you want just update the components. Fairphone does this to some extent, sadly I don't think the cpu/modem though. x |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Quote:
|
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Quote:
And going to such a remote area, you might need a satellite phone. Yes there will be cell coverage in the large cities such as Fairbanks. |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Quote:
When you get high enough even the up to 45 degree LEO sats like Globalstar get hard to access, forget geostationary orbit inmarsat to low on the useful horizon and I guess only Iridium with its LEO polar coverage comes into it's prime. IDK most of the time I would be in Anchorage but yea if I have to go north I guess it is wireline, QRP HF amateur radio or Iridium along with all of the offline data I can stuff into flash drives. I noticed inmarsat recently tossed up data package on three Molinya orbit birds to give virtual geostationary coverage to the norther polar area. No idea how mobile the equipment is, probably is a steered dish antenna or a phased array pizza box like starlink. https://paxex.aero/2019/07/inmarsat-gx-arctic-coverage/ that has to be some wicked doppler. |
Re: Possible End of N900 era on t-mobile US
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8