![]() |
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Quote:
hell, 3G systems are, iirc, more frequency efficient then older tech, so in theory you do not need as many antennas to cover the same number of subscribers. but as currently used frequencies (at least in europe) have worse penetration then GSM ones, more are needed to get effective coverage in densely populated areas (reinforced concrete is a very effective signal blocker, go fig). |
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
hmm. I got the NIT because I don't have a cell phone (or cable tv or landline). The pricing structure in North America is insane IMHO. I run my own VoIP PBX and IM server and can support my whole family and close friends with local numbers and cheap long distance for the cost of one cell plan. Plus WiFI is plenty fast enough. I give up the cell capabilities but WiFI is available where I need it, way way cheaper, and much faster. It is just simple data to me. The SIP and WiFI works very nicely on my N800.
But this WiMAX you speak of..... might be interesting if it is even available around here (Canada). However I have serious doubts that it will be as affordable as I want. No idea right now but worth a look. Best news about a WiMAX is that the 800 & 810 might get really cheap soon. :) |
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
One more advantage of wimax offered by sprint is that they are quoting that you need not sign a contract...... you can either take monthly or a daily service.
|
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Quote:
|
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Quote:
Yeah, 3G in-device is technically feasible, but Nokia's not doing it. If you want a raw network comparison, without regard to device availability, of mobile WiMAX vs. 3G, it boils down to: WiMAX is faster. But I'm not sure the extra speed is of any practical use in an N810; CPU usage may limit throughput anyhow... Tso, I realize those aren't tech dependent, but we know what 3G costs and what its coverage is like, because it's already deployed. I was just pointing out that some excitement may be on account of optimistic assumptions that optimists make when they don't have facts. I guess I interpreted this thread as being more N810W aligned, while some of you are speaking more of WiMAX in general. My remarks should be understood in that context. |
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Quote:
I hope they use lubricant. |
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Quote:
However this goes against what I thought was the best news (dirt cheap WiFI units). I'd still have to wait until the new units come down in price. I'm perfectly happy with the geeky nature of these NITs since I run my own services and find the N800 much more suited to my needs than any closed system I've seen including the fashionable iDevices et al. |
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Until I can find two open wifi hotspots in the areas I travel, basic wifi less the max stuff is so close to useless as to be so.
As someone said, lots of cars and no roads... Fortunately the n800 makes a decent ebook reader :). |
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Quote:
|
Re: Why is WiMax such a big deal?
Quote:
It will come down to who offers the service. The cell/broadband incumbents are so far off from my needs that I no longer even look at the products (perhaps why I didn't know that anyone offered WiMAX here). I'm very happy that Nokia has taken the design stance it has on these NITs. Linux + WiFI with *no* cell function was a good move for the niche market that I am. Brilliant move in fact. I saw a TED.com speech that nailed the problem as I see it and Nokia has shown some promise with these things so far. I just have to find out more about it and see real world reviews (both WiMAX and the nMAX). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:50. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8