![]() |
Re: N900 function compared to G1
What anyone buying this phone must remember is that it is a new device, not yet released AND it is a new platform. Anyone who bought the nokia 5800 remembers how long it took to get a lot of apps available. Today i have over 600 applications available including shazam and many other great applications.
I agree with much of what has been said, Qt will make this process faster going forward and level the overall mobile application world. I will concede that maybe the n900 is not right for you today but it may be in a few months. |
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Quote:
Just expand on my point above (that there will be some pain between Maemo 5 and 6), Maemo apps will have to be altered to sense vertical vs. horizontal orientation, and most developers will probably want to convert to Qt from GTK, because that's Nokia's direction. Neither of those changes are trivial. |
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Quote:
|
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Quote:
I think Maemo has the potential to be a better platform (which means better apps and better performance) than Android in a couple of years. But Android is more advanced today, even though most of the released hardware isn't very good. |
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Quote:
|
Re: N900 function compared to G1
The problem is that there is only one phone running Maemo5, and even then it is unreleased(!). Outside the scope of hobbyists, opensource, I don't think you'll see many commercial applications (free or otherwise) ported to the phone until it sees wider market penetration. Nokia needs to ditch/migrate from the S60 platform and make Maemo available on cheaper smartphones. Otherwise it'll just a be a niche platform.
|
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Quote:
Java bite code translation is a security requirement for Android and holds down app performance and prevents audio or video codecs from being developed for this reason. It will be interesting to see how well Flash works on current device ;) Android is terribly inefficient in regards to resource usage. Again, I have an $85 Dingoo that has a weaker chipset and humiliates the G1. The Dingoo plays Metal Slug 5 and King of Fighters 2001 perfectly with sound. The G1 is like a slide show and that is with no sound. |
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Android is dead to me, it doesn't yet support ssh tunnelling and a functional Rdesktop, the 2 apps that make my n810 a device i keep on me all the time
|
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Quote:
Are we sure the N900 can not be used to text in portrait mode using a VK or use voice search for the web? :o |
Re: N900 function compared to G1
Quote:
Now there's nothing wrong with that, because their efforts and time are still extremely appreciated, but it means that a lot of suggestions they see as pointless won't be worked on unless more commercial developers see a cash opportunity in it, which will turn off a lot of average users, which will repel commercial developers even more, cycle continues, blahblahblah. Maemo 5 isn't supposed to be 100% mainstream yet, but even in the next step, if the community temperament hasn't changed, I can't see Maemo 6 making that huge of a splash either. (Did this ramble make sense? It's very early in the morning. xD) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8