maemo.org - Talk - [Testing Squad]

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)

- Community (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16)

- - [Testing Squad] - February 2010 (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=44143)

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasler (Post 523397)

The current version in Extras-testing has some changes that are very minor code-wise, but adds some nice functionality. So I better wait till I can promote it, which is only 3 days more. :)

I'm still wondering what happened to 5 days 5 votes decision

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikkov (Post 523516)

I'm still wondering what happened to 5 days 5 votes decision

After more pondering we didn't reached a final consensus on that, so the current rules will be kept.

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

Hi,

here's the list of applications under testing this week.

Week 7:

http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...cs/20070225-2/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...n/2.6-1maemo5/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...ra/20070225-2/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...witcher/0.3.6/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in.../0.9.3-maemo7/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...eragent/0.3.7/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in.../ejpi/0.9.7-1/ - Promoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...eltests/0.1.1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...apier/1.0.5-3/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in.../0.73-7maemo5/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...ager/0.9.30-1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...light/0.2.0-2/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...ilblogg/0.9.0/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...920.2-3maemo1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...atch-home/0.3/ - Demoted

Results from week 6(2 promoted, 3 demoted):

http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...er/1.0-maemo7/ - Promoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...bledict/0.1-2/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...omeip/1.0.0-4/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...systray/0.0.1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...erule/1.0.4-1/ - Promoted

Just two remarks since some have asked:

* The bugtracker field is now mandatory, as you can see by the system notifications, apps without that field can't be promoted to extras, please also check if the field is valid, some developers just put there bugs.maemo.org without a product, e-mail addresses are valid for small apps(themes, widgets,...).
* You don't need to comment if you don't have anything to add to the discussion, for example is someone already commented that the package needs a bugtracker or is not optified, you don't need to repeat the same, just vote down.

I appreciate if someone with time add these two points to the faq(I'll be traveling this week): http://wiki.maemo.org/Testing_Squad

Great job so far.

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

When the new firmware (PR1.2) with the Qt 4.6 is released, there is a possibility that current Qt apps don't work well or at all. If I understood correctly, a repacking might be enough. My question is, would it be possible to release updates to these apps, if only repacking was needed, as soon as possible without waiting for the usual 10 days?

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

VDVsx,
Links broken in last category

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by slender (Post 541484)

VDVsx,
Links broken in last category

Thanks fixed.
Damn copy&paste ;)

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasler (Post 541476)

That's a good question, the current system doesn't allow that(proposed improvements allow), but I'll ask the responsible about that.

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by VDVsx (Post 525373)

Hi,

* The bugtracker field is now mandatory, as you can see by the system notifications, apps without that field can't be promoted to extras, please also check if the field is valid, some developers just put there bugs.maemo.org without a product, e-mail addresses are valid for small apps(themes, widgets,...).

Bugtracker link has no real value. IMHO better system would that there is a default bugtracker for all packages (including libraries) and if maintainer wants to use some other bugtracker it can be marked with bugtracker field. Optimally bugzilla would be the default bugtracker, but since bugmaster clearly doesn't want that, packages interface can be used instead.

Re: [Testing Squad] - February 2010