maemo.org - Talk
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Nokia N900 (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   N900's graphics processor performance comparison (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=48394)

emeni 2010-03-26 20:09
Re: N900's graphics processor performance comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by javispedro (Post 583617)
Testing methodology failure.


I've heard this a number of times (all of them here), but there are no definitive sources about this. Even if it were true (which at this point I doubt), how do we know games do not change its operating frequency?
because it an iphone, which is very closed. everybody know apple doesn't allow the developers to do a lot of things, like multi tasting etc, and that they are very strict with their developers. From what I remember even the cpu is undercloacked and doesn't run at it's full potential, because it will eat their battery alive. apple will never let a developer use what ever he closed.
and lets not count jailbreak since from apples point of view that's illegal

Bundyo 2010-03-26 20:41
Re: N900's graphics processor performance comparison
 
Yup, I've also saw it here, but there was a link to some source if I remember correctly. Anyway things like chipset and additional hardware helpers can lower the scales either way.

Some GLES 1.1 benchmarks here:
http://www.glbenchmark.com/compare.jsp

No N900 or aforementioned Samsung phones.

cashclientel 2010-03-26 21:03
Re: N900's graphics processor performance comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysss (Post 583628)
Content is key...
Double fail for the N900 then!

jaguilar 2010-03-26 21:08
Re: N900's graphics processor performance comparison
 
I only saw numbers....where are the real comparison?
(the question isn't to plaban, but for the post author in the blog)

javispedro 2010-03-26 22:43
Re: N900's graphics processor performance comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by emeni (Post 583699)
From what I remember even the cpu is undercloacked and doesn't run at it's full potential, because it will eat their battery alive. apple will never let a developer use what ever he closed.
The cause of A is A? Apple's walled garden doesn't mean they underclock the CPU, and doesn't necessarily mean they don't have a "enterGameMode" API.

Alex Atkin UK 2010-03-27 01:21
Re: N900's graphics processor performance comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaban (Post 583577)
Samsung Wave and I9000 Galaxy has graphics processor which is more than 6 times faster than N900's.
I quite like the look of the Samsung Wave especially the media player. Why is the N900 media player so primitive and boring?

Its annoying as I see polish on the Wave interface that the N900 badly needs for that "cool" factor. I'm almost tempted to get the Wave when I renew my other T-Mobile contract in July, have it as a backup phone. Except no "free" phone is free, it would probably cost at least £240 over the course of the year in how much more the contract would be than a renewed SIM only one will do and I can't rationalise that.

patlak 2010-12-27 15:28
Re: N900's graphics processor performance comparison
 
GLbenchmark 2.0 is available; N900 is supported. Device performance comparison


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:29.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8