maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera) (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=52387)

lostinmirkwood 2010-05-11 13:06

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
One other thing,
I assume that this test was run on a consistent WiFi network,
and that each candidate test was carried out temporally close to one another.

Because it still seems odd, that the browser benchmark would show MicroB 35% faster; but average real world tests shows around 65-72% of the performance of other browsers.

giannoug 2010-05-11 13:08

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Fantastic job mate!

I also found Opera Mobile really fast. The virtual keyboard also is a huge plus.

It would be nice if you could also put Tear and Google Chrome in those tests (just for the numbers).

Ministeri 2010-05-11 13:10

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lostinmirkwood (Post 653389)
One other thing,
I assume that this test was run on a consistent WiFi network,
and that each candidate test was carried out temporally close to one another.

Because it still seems odd, that the browser benchmark would show MicroB 35% faster; but average real world tests shows around 65-72% of the performance of other browsers.

Test was run in a fast WiFi network in a short time period. Each test was run twice and there was not big differences between the runs (<1 second).

Order:
MicroB, first run
Fennec, first run
Opera, first run
MicroB, second run
Fennec, second run
Opera, second run

mehdiE 2010-05-11 13:12

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahockersten (Post 653385)
Of course, I'm one of the guys doing the Opera port, so I'm obviously biased towards making Opera look better than the other browsers.

I don't think you even need to try ;)

Firefox Mobile is hardly usable at all and after a little while playing with Opera Mobile even Micro-B pales in comparison.

If you manage to make a steady stream of small bug-fixes releases over the next few weeks, you'll be the heros of all Maemo users :)

Chrome 2010-05-11 13:12

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Thanks for the useful comparison.

I though fennec 1.1 alpha was latest, where do i get 2.0?

nosa101 2010-05-11 13:14

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Opera certainly has the fastest start up of all three. I feel fennec has the most potential though

Ministeri 2010-05-11 13:14

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrome (Post 653402)
Thanks for the useful comparison.

I though fennec 1.1 alpha was latest, where do i get 2.0?

This is the version number the application manager shows.

zaksloan 2010-05-11 13:16

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Also have a look at the Acid3 browser tests:

Acid3 is a test page from the Web Standards Project that checks how well a web browser follows certain selected elements from web standards, especially relating to the Document Object Model (DOM) and JavaScript.

The full Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3

The test itself can be found here: http://acid3.acidtests.org/

Chrome 2010-05-11 13:16

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Warning: Very stupid question:

Average:
Fennec: 7,56
Fennec Jit: 8,35
Opera Mobile: 8,74
MicroB: 12,01

Is highest or lowest result better?

Ministeri 2010-05-11 13:17

Re: [N900] Browser Benchmarking (MicroB, Fennec, Opera)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrome (Post 653413)
Warning: Very stupid question:

Average:
Fennec: 7,56
Fennec Jit: 8,35
Opera Mobile: 8,74
MicroB: 12,01

Is highest or lowest result better?

There is not a stupid question. Lower is better as it says after headline.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:15.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8