![]() |
Re: Crackdown on Heavy Internet Users
If I may play devil's advocate (and I do so on a pretty regular basis)...
Why not charge people who use the internet and draw more data than other users? Sure, while the cost of shaking electrons and sending packets is minimal, there is still the limitations of the network. And charging the end users (indeed, "the consumers") directly for the data used would be a good way to either curb certain habits, or to more fully fund the service they use. We get charged by the watt for our electricity, we get charged by the gallon for water and fuel, and data is another resource that we should regard in the same manner. Sure, the website isn't going to run out, but it takes energy (real measurable energy) to run the networks and host the sites; maybe those who draw the most energy should pay for it. Plus, if we moved to an incremental charge, light users would have less of a barrier to data plans, or internet access. Potentially, with the end users paying for their actual traffic, this would lead to true net neutrality, since you pay for what you use and the carriers would be less inclined to force every content provider to pay for their traffic (which would risk crippling every small homepage that gets too many "diggs"). In addition, people who write lean/economicial code would be rewarded by more people using their efficient creations instead of resource and bandwidth hogs. Now, I do agree that there needs to be more competition in the market place. One company setting prices is going to hurt consumers enough. But charging "by-the-byte" will not be the end of the world. |
Re: Crackdown on Heavy Internet Users
Quote:
I am also VERY surprised to not see any warning about how you worded yourself here from moderator(s) posting in this thread as that is common when someone is abusing other members. |
Re: Crackdown on Heavy Internet Users
Re;
Quote:
Quote:
My plate overfloweth right now. There's no way of overstating that. |
Re: Crackdown on Heavy Internet Users
Quote:
|
Re: Crackdown on Heavy Internet Users
Quote:
|
Re: Crackdown on Heavy Internet Users
Quote:
I could see if they were a health insurance company or a petroleum copany or something where there isnt that much to compete with and the four of these companies can get together and set the bar for prices but thats not the case here. not when you have boost mobile. cricket. tmo and all the other lil guys out there just waiting to take a part of the market. i woudln't be too concerned with this. it wont last long. prime example i left at&t. not just for the n900 but because tmo was waaay cheaper ! when it comes down to it the "have nots" out number the haves and the majority of people will go for certain sacifices in the name of stretching the all mighty dollah dollah bill yall! |
Re: Crackdown on Heavy Internet Users
Quote:
not to shoot down your idea though. for some it would be great. those of us who are not that data heavy probably wouldnt care. but for the rest of the world who got smart phones for there wonderful capabilities which require internet it would totally suck |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:13. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8