maemo.org - Talk
Page 2 of 28 1 2 3412 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Community (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Community input for new t.m.o. policy (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=56702)

abill_uk 2010-06-20 21:33
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
What about when a post is reported and is ignored or no explanation given for the ignoring of the reported post by a moderator?.
Should be always a reason given if no action taken against a reported post.

ysss 2010-06-20 21:38
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
What about private messages?
Do any of these rules extend to pm's??

geneven 2010-06-20 21:39
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
These policies seem designed to protect Nokia and maximize the power of moderators. Since we know that both are beyond reproach, these goals are entirely appropriate.

acou 2010-06-20 21:40
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
Such a fascist hoopla for nothing. Actually i've never ever encountered any foul language, attacks, insults or any other neatly listed issue here at TMO. My biggest concern is the tricky trolling and fanboyism.

Joorin 2010-06-20 21:41
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysss (Post 723007)
What about private messages?
Do any of these rules extend to pm's??
From OP:
Quote:
The following rules apply to any post, submission, or other type of communication a member makes in talk.maemo.org.
I interpret this as covering PMs too.

Joorin 2010-06-20 21:43
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by acou (Post 723011)
Such a fascist hoopla for nothing. Actually i've never ever encountered any foul language, attacks, insults or any other neatly listed issue here at TMO. My biggest concern is the tricky trolling and fanboyism.
Fascist? Really? Did you look up the word "fascist" before making your comment?

Rules aren't "fascist" per definition, as you are implying.

mmurfin87 2010-06-20 21:45
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laughing Man (Post 722986)
Or maybe have their [new posters] first ten posts manually approved the only thing that will happen is new accounts being made over and over.
I like this idea. You could even take it a step further by giving a few rotating community members "mentor" status and be assigned new posters. Their job would be not only to manually approve the new poster's initial 10 or so posts, but also to provide helpful feedback on what is an isn't an appropriate question/comment.

So a new poster tries to post a question thats been answered 10 thousand times before, and the "mentor" would kindly direct that user towards the search. That would make the community seem 10 times nicer since we wouldn't be jumping all over new posters while simultaneously making smarter forum-goers.

Nathraiben 2010-06-20 21:46
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laughing Man (Post 722986)
And from my experiences (on both sides of the coin) IP banning is pointless.
And, this coming from someone who had to bear with an IP rotation ISP for a couple of years, it can be pretty harmful, too.

You wouldn't want to know how many forums "I" was banned from just because some total stranger - who happened to have been yesterday's owner of my current IP address - had misbehaved.

pantera1989 2010-06-20 21:52
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by geneven (Post 723008)
These policies seem designed to protect Nokia and maximize the power of moderators. Since we know that both are beyond reproach, these goals are entirely appropriate.
I disagree. Posting Nokia should do this, and Nokia sux and whatever they post has got me tired. They are not saying do not post against Nokia. They are just saying go annoy them in their forums. Perfectly reasonable.

You mean to tell me you are not seriously tired of seeing the same useless threads over and over again?

acou 2010-06-20 21:53
Re: Community input for new t.m.o. policy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joorin (Post 723017)
Fascist? Really? Did you look up the word "fascist" before making your comment?

Rules aren't "fascist" per definition, as you are implying.
There is no universal definition of this term, so i think your interpretation is rather biased.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:53.
Page 2 of 28 1 2 3412 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8