maemo.org - Talk
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks! (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=60231)

mobiledivide 2010-08-12 19:25
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
I wonder about all the N900 complaints sometimes and then I see shots like this and I get it. My camera takes pictures closer to the last shot there but arguably better. There is probably a lot of faulty devices out there.

timwatt 2010-08-12 21:14
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
my n900 camera sucks in low light. it has a white haze and pour contrast, worse than you first to photos. in bright light i the camera is good.

les_garten 2010-08-12 21:16
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by timwatt (Post 784663)
my n900 camera sucks in low light. it has a white haze and pour contrast, worse than you first to photos. in bright light i the camera is good.
FLASH vs NO FLASH??

Cue 2010-08-12 21:22
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
please can you also test the front camera. I've heard they vary with hardware revisions perhaps it's the same with the back.

bigdarkmad 2010-08-12 21:32
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cue (Post 784674)
please can you also test the front camera. I've heard they vary with hardware revisions perhaps it's the same with the back.
My front camera is horrible.
The back on pr 1.1.1 (may be) good, after Pr.1.2 update not very

patlak 2010-08-12 21:33
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
Damn, that's some outrageously LARGE dildo on the table............. o.O

philheaton 2010-08-12 21:51
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
I've also noticed the quality of photos dramatically reduced since installing/reflashing PR1.2. When I first got the device, I took some amazing shots of the Forth Road Bridges with great clarity and vibrant colours. Now everything seems to be shot from behind a veil. I played around with some of the settings like exposure, resolution etc, but nothing seems to get it back to the quality it once was :(

olympus 2010-08-12 23:39
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by patlak (Post 784687)
Damn, that's some outrageously LARGE dildo on the table............. o.O
it is isn't it? :D

TiagoTiago 2010-08-12 23:55
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
hm, i've just tested mine setting the flash to always on and taking a pic of somthing black and it does get the white haze, i tried doing it without the back cover but it kept triggering the dashboard (i use shortcutd) if necessary i'll go disable it, but i don't think it will matter, there is no cover over the camera (with the lens cover open), it's a hole, nothing to reflect the flash there

edit: taking a pic of a indoor scene with white walls and other colored objects still has the white haze, so it wasn't just the black thing reflecting the flash

kureyon 2010-08-13 05:01
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by patlak (Post 784687)
Damn, that's some outrageously LARGE dildo on the table............. o.O
You're letting your imagination run wild. It looks like a clothes hanger to me. Or were you referring to the bottles of water ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:58.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8