Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

What can be the perceived performance when using applications that send dbus messages or execute shell commands? These should be using different TTYs, right?
And what about daemons running in background?

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

Ignacius is absolutely correct. This wont make any difference in typical point and click usage for exactly the reason given. Whilst an empiric approach is cool simply because it's a good way to learn, there are times where it is indeed better to discuss than to try. Although I'm just a stranger from the internet, I've been smacking my head against this whole Unix thing for near on 2 decades, I do feel this is one of those times that it's better to understand why it wont make a difference than to try and see if it does.

: )

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

Thanks for this approach, but it won't give us any boost.

If someone in here could just point me out the links to the maemo kernel compilation guide (got a shitty mouse in herer) I'm gonna compile the newest power kernel and the standard kernel with the mighty quickness patch and pubish it in here, if there's some interest.

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

You have my interest. :)

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

Also I don't understand this patch it is working great and when in x-terminal!

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

Do it ,we r waiting.

:)

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

Yes, I tryed it for a while and it really makes no difference.

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

What you describe in this thread is already used by Maemo.

Have a look at /usr/share/policy/etc/current/syspart.conf, which is a configuration file (most probably) for the ohmd daemon, which seems to do what you already want.

cgroups are mounted under /cgroups, so go there to see what's going on.

Re: Package: Alternative To The "200 Lines Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" Which You Can Use Right Away
 

why not use this ? http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=73315