![]() |
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
So... we're all about limiting choices now? Interesting.
|
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
Quote:
"Leave the 512k limits on MSDOS alone; 512k is quite alot, user will never need anything more than that." bun |
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
interesting points raised. However think of it this way:
You don't need a car, but yet more or less every family in the developed countries have a car, because you can drive. Same applies with the N900 & Nitdroid. You don't need Nitdroid to make the N900 work, but you can install Nitdroid on your N900?.. it's bout being able to carry out a task... and in my opinion its great being able to run 2 OS's on a 'mobile' device.. I mean there are loads of things that are not needed, inc. taxes, poverty and war... But you still find them around... |
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
Quote:
|
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
A while ago i saw a video of someone running Mac OS (or was it OSX?) on the N900, sure it took more than a hour just to open a menu, but it was among the greatest achievements filled under the category "because we can", makes me proud to walk around each day with such a beast by my crotch.
|
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
Quote:
|
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
Quote:
|
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
We don't need Android - period. But we need devices like the N900 to try these suckers out.
We definitely need Opera on the N800. Love it :) |
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
Quote:
"I don't need Android - period. But I need a device like the N900 to try these suckers out. I definitely need Opera on the N800." It just... seems more correct since I personally want Android on the N900. Why? Because NITDroid will invariably be more supported, even if it gets a halfway hacked version of 2.3 or 3.0 than the end of life Maemo 5. |
Re: we dont need android on n900!!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:57. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8