![]() |
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
But one thing is for sure, what went wrong happened several years ago. Elop and MS is just the end of it. |
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
As I stated in my opening post, I don't believe WP7 is actually an improvement on the previous path.
All I wanted to say is, on these boards it's tempting to blame Elop/WP7/Microsoft/Nokia management for the failure of the project. But maybe the prosaic truth is simply that MeeGo failed because developers couldn't get something good enough finished quickly enough. |
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
Steve Jobs did not sell off Apple. He re-innovated. |
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
So meego can be considered too late but a beta version of WP7 that just came out in November is not huh? Really the last update of WP7 just released a week ago added what should have been in at launch, a bunch of crap is still missing from it to be added in the next update and the development sdk is still missing a bunch of core API things to come later in the year
|
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
I feel no need to become an apologist for Nokia's management. I thought things were messy when Meego was announced a year ago, but there is no match to the mess we're going to see the two years to come. What with WP7 completely undercooked (no multitasking, no copy/paste), and at the same time need to write all hardware drivers to put it on Nokia's devices. Will WP7 run well on the low range phones that currently use Symbian? As I said, I am no expert at all, but my gut feeling tells me Nokia's problems aren't just going to go away with a new OS. |
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
Well some is maybe because of this :-( http://thenokiablog.com/2011/02/12/m...vice-rejected/ |
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
|
Re: Maybe the unpleasant truth is that MeeGo really was too late and/or not good enough?
Quote:
If Elop didn't see the value in MeeGo, then that was the board's inability to convey that. They were supposed to show all aspects of their operations, including future iterations of OS's and how that would be advantageous to their next set of projects going forward. That... somehow didn't happen. So what happened? He talked about what he knew... a MS OS. And the board didn't fight against it well enough to stop it. We can all wonder why, but it's just what happened. Speculate on your own - there's tons of theories. The MSFT flunky that invaded Nokia was invited by Nokia's board of directors. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:39. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8