![]() |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
I am curious to know how which tools / compilers was used for a such port ?
On wp7 I know there is a NDK but available to restricted partners ... -- http://rzr.online.fr/q/qt |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
"Available to restricted partners" means unavailable in practice. So until they release it actually - it doesn't worth your attention.
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Yeah, Firefox Mobile for WP7 is one of the fastest ports :)
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
Developers will go for Qt if its on a commercially viable platform! :) |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Holy ****, Qt is already "commercially viable" for ages. Hint: WP is not hindered by the missing Qt support.
From TFA: "Imagine if Qt developers suddenly just had the ability to port tens of thousands of apps to the platform? (I’m sure it’s not that simple otherwise, N9 would also have tens of thousands of N8′s Qt apps)." Well said. Btw: where's Waldo, err, gerbick, w/ his opinion? IIRC he was one of those viable WP devs? |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Who gives a damn about WP??? Even if they get Qt iit wouldn't change the fact that the mainstream smartphone users do not want anything to do with windows phones.
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
http://www.developer.nokia.com/Commu...ps_to_Nokia_N9 |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
i dont want qt on wpsuck.
thing is qt rocks and without qt wp will fail. And I want to see elop and bllmers crying when theyr realise theyr os s biggest joke ever. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8