Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

I see the benefit in having someone with Jim's background around but I hope he posts his stand on the appointment soon. People are mostly clueless on who he is.

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

Jim definitely comes across a lot better on "his" personal page then on the wiki page, which isn't much of a feat, of course.

maybe he could still create a Maemo account and post what his interest (if any?) in Maemo is respectively how he feel he would contribute?

reasonable conclusion, indeed :cool:

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

What we're seeing here is an old-fashioned method of seizing power from SD69. Now that he's the only one, instead of holding an election as required in the constitution (note the election trigger clause has no seven-day time limit), he's appointing His People. woody's probably fine, but the fact that he's bringing in some other guy who can't even be bothered to make a maemo.org account frankly spells the end of any credibility here. This is a pretty common move when you want to make sure that out of two non-SD69 people, one will always vote his way.

This is a total attack on the democratic nature of the Board constitution, and should not be accepted by anyone, including the authorities of the state under whose laws the Foundation is formed.

If you people let him get away with this, you can kiss the Hildon Foundation goodbye. It is 100% SD69's podium from here on out.

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

This is incorrect. Revision 7 of the ByLaws (which is the last revision posted here on the forum, and officially voted in), Section IV, paragraph 6 reads:

Not quite. In my accepting the position, assuming the appointment is valid, currently there are at least two Directors. Until Jim's public announcement of his acceptance, we both have an equal vote. Meaning for anything to move forward, we must both agree on it, as a conflict will result in deadlock.

There must also be a voice/video meeting between the three of us, which should happen very soon now. As of yet, I've had no communication with anyone else involved in HiFo, be that other active/appointed Directors or agents of the Board (Treasurer, Communications, etc). To be fair, I've been rather busy and haven't mailed them directly myself either.

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

Time for you to drop your conspiracy hat. Are you running for one of the spots or what?

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

Excellent. At least he worked out the obstructions before he played the game.


And what happens if Jim refuses the appointment, or simply doesn't bother responding? Will there be an election, or will it be more "well, we're having one later anyway, so we'll just sit here for now."



Nope! But this isn't the first time we've seen SD69 ruin things. Or are we not allowed to talk about NDAs?

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

(reserved for future comments -- all the cool guys are posting this)

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

@stenny - the council can always call for elections of both (board and council) bodies, stay cool :)

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

http://www.mobilespeedtest.com/results/1121085234.jpg

that stenny guy sounds like a feud of old of this forum, doesn't he... :confused::rolleyes:
one who should know all too well how this forum deals with usurpation, whether technical or factual :mad:

Re: [Council] Community Thoughts About Board Reelection
 

There seems to be a misunderstanding.

Maemo Community Council is not the same thing as Hildon Foundation Council. It thus has no official relationship to Hildon Foundation Board, and can't call for elections of Hildon Foundation Board or Hildon Foundation Council. It can call for elections of the next maemo council, which seems pointless in my opinion, since Nokia long ago stopped talking to maemo council.