![]() |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Quote:
I don't get what you're on about. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
And please note, that Symbian has got lost freshness (it's not only my opinion and it's cited in many good pages). It's easy to open something, what people are not interested so much about. Generally: I don't buy things written by some people (that Nokia is so good and opened now). And it's about it. Up to this moment nobody proved, that it's differently... |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Then could you please tell us what they would have to do in your eyes to be accepted by you as a company supporting open source? Because you somehow completely failed to do so while you were whining. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
http://maemo.org/packages/repository/ Mike C |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
1. treat N900 and Maemo a little bit more seriously. Device should have ALL functionality available in "closed" phones created with at least the same quality OR there be CLEAR info, when this functionality will be released (year, two ?). It would be excellent too, when they will have plans to make Maemo third main line too (but not in the most expensive devices only !). 2. give a real support for users of all their phones for people working for example with Linux. Library or something like this. Able to get/set calendar, pbk, notes and few other details. Or give help with this for Open Source projects. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
I'm about as cynical as they come and I generally agree with the notion that they're doing a "decent" job of being open compared to most manufacturers but I don't feel like a lot of that credit goes so much to Nokia than perhaps to the chipset manufacturers and others. Otherwise, why would Nokia continue to make their own applications running on these tablets completely closed? Mind you--I've been surprised by some of the corrections I've gotten from the Fremantle openness compared to the closed-minded source code of the N800 series.. but it doesn't help me, given I'll probably be stuck with the N800 series for a while until something else without a cellular radio comes along--IF it comes along. In the meantime, I still feel jailed by the closed-minded code and I can understand what I think MIGHT be the OP's frustration. (Although, honestly, I think he's going over the top and much more cynical than I am. Despite what people might expect, I'm delighted each time I'm proven wrong.) |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
I don't really see what that has to do with openness or Nokia not being open source friendly. Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Marcinw, if you are honest and do really appreciate Open Source projects, then stop whining and trolling on this community board.
We got your message already. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
They also made it pretty clear the N900 is not meant to be the perfect phone, its a transitional device. Its basically a case of "get something to market now to promote interest". The whole idea being that by Maemo 6 things will be more complete. That to me is actually a pain for the end user for a very open source way of doing it, rather than doing everything behind closed doors. If anything my personal biggest complaint is that Ovi Maps is not as complete as the version on cheaper Symbian devices, but that in fact seems to be caused by focusing more on open source than commercial support. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Some things will stay closed and proprietary... Nokia are not a charity, and what would stop other phone companies from ripping off their software ? They need to hold something back to be able to sell the hardware, while giving enough out (especially compared to others) so people can do what they want with their device. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Mike C |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
2. Maemo is not 100% seriously treated You don't have to agree with my opinion. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
If you seriously expect Nokia to give advance information about features like MMS support, just look what happened when they announced they'd ship in October and we're now 10 days into a delay. Personally, I'd just keep quiet and release MMS support when it's done. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
So by your definition, closed source, proprietary software is open, and open software is not if the jobs that come with it are in Finland. Is that it now? Can we move on to another "N900 will ship on Nov 12th"-thread? |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
One more example - Currently you can prepare with Android application sending SMS, with Maemo 5 I have problems with finding API. And please don't say, that this is because Maemo 5 is not feature complete. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Compared to the rest of the community: http://maemo.org/profile/list/ And those numbers were after I had about 6 months or more away from the community... but I'm sure you're just going to call karma numbers ******** anyways. I'm one of the most well-known community members here and have helped to push different ideas and projects forward. So you wanted to question my effort in the community... now it's time for you to tell us what you've done in this community. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Sorry, but I have to react... "YYYYYEAAAAH!! You tell 'em!" :P Why does this thread feel more like a schoolyard brawl? |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
If Nokia took the N900 seriously, it would also offer tech support from people who could speak English. But that's a different topic. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Actually, I don't have a myspace page, JayOnThaBeat. I also don't have Facebook. Or Twitter, for that matter. But I programmed in the Unix shell before there was a Linux, and I used Perl before there were shelves of books dedicated to it.
I notice that you have been thanked 508 times, but you have nothing to say that is relevant to the point. You quote me returning the foul language of Bratag, but you have nothing critical to say about Bratag. You're not a troll, though. You are a core participant here, and nicely represent the mainstream contempt for the consumer that seems typical of Maemo types. As Nokia cannot share such contempt in the long run, I conclude that Nokia has little interest in consumers actually using this phone. That squares with its refusal to associate the phone with T-Mobile in the US, thus meaning that there will be no phone-based technical support in the US. And, based on my reading, I expect that Nokia will not take consumers seriously until (perhaps) Maemo 6. Very well, I will tune back in when Maemo 6 is released. So, continue tapping away in your echo chamber. Meantime, I have decided on a Blackberry Storm2 with Verizon. It has all the functionality that I need, is relatively stable, is dedicated to business users without outstanding connectivity, has abundant useful apps for my purposes, has wireless capability (about time), and is very secure. It will not drive a TV screen, and it has a primitive OS compared with Maemo. But it also runs on the US's best carrier and is a world phone to boot. And, its OS is a hell of a lot better than Symbian. But then RIM doesn't know anything about marketing its phones. Oh wait.... |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
srk052004, I must ask, you have posted on this forum a whole five times, three of them have been on this page alone and none of them have been constructive in the least, with much of it being crude and condescending.
I've noticed that posters such as yourself and the starter of this thread have come in and presented largely nothing in terms of convincing arguments, and seem here only to start fires and fan the flames. If you do not like what you see here, and have some fundamental disagreement with the way things are going, then do one of two things: 1. If it is something that involves the community and is within its capacity to change, post a reasoned suggestion or constructive criticism or, 2. If it is something under the influence of Nokia and you can see the community has no pull on it, please refrain from posting at all |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Who cares about MMS? A radio app. would be nice, but S60 5th doesn't even have internet radio, and I know which one I prefer. |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Quote:
/* skip the obvious troll part */ Quote:
All I can say is "so long and thanks for all the fish". |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
Code:
#!/bin/sh |
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
|
Re: Why should I believe Nokia ? Why should I work for Nokia for free ? ... again
Quote:
My experience with the "typical Maemo type" is quite the reverse - open, helpful and willing to give up their own type to help someone else. Note: This is not meant directly at you Jay - it's in general. No offence intended. Quote:
I have no idea on phone-based technical support - but I'd assume it's available from Nokia Support in the country of purchase - I might be wrong as I've never used such a service. Quote:
fwiw, the "US's best carrier" might not be compatible with the rest of the worlds standardized 3G network - and the choice between some USA customers and the better part of the rest of the world... Well, I think I can understand why they went with the rest of the world. :) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:26. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8