![]() |
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
Given how widespread KDE is in the Desktop environment, I don't think Nokia dumping it, will mean too much, as it's supposed to be gpl'd isn't it? Also worth considering Novell's interest in this as they contribute to Meego (and KDE). With MS pushing into arm platforms at around the same time they strike a deal with the world's largest handset maker, Intel is looking at losing any leverage they had in the mobile market, all at a time when they still haven't managed to produce a competitve mobile cpu for handsets. will be interesting to see if Intel throws more resourcing to meego development now that Nokia have withdrawn so much support.... |
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
If you talk about the Apple or Android ecosystems I think people understand what you're talking about. For Nokia there's just a bunch of technologies and they haven't really put it all together. That was my point, not that there needs to be a Qt store per se. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
MeeGo was incredibly behind (according to the article). Since Qt is a core component, so was Qt. Would MeeGo have been better off with just GTK (like Maemo)? One can only assume that it would have released faster. The cause of the delay of MeeGo devices can't be blamed on Qt but it certainly doesn't help. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
Oh, btw, Elop did decide not to distribute a Q1 Non-Symbian Qt based device - but that wasn't what I was saying. |
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
A buttload (I mean like hundreds and hundreds of thousands) of custom-made business apps are built on top of Qt.
Most of these apps run only on Windows and are not released to the general public, however. :) The point is that Qt is probably the single most widely-known API on the planet right now. Certiainly it is more widely-known than any Microsoft toolkit. This means that once a real phone with real Qt support hits the market, the barrier to writing mobile apps will be lowered significantly. Quote:
|
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
|
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
... I am not going to repeat myself yet again when clearly there's too much interference on the line to understand the very simple message. |
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
|
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
And your qualifications to make that statement would be what, exactly?
I do a lot of hiring for software developers, and I see a lot of resumes. I know what I'm talking about, as it's based on real-world observations. Quote:
|
Re: Elops oh s**t moment for Meego
Quote:
Did you ask if I think Symbian would provide MeeGo any synergy? Yes, I think it would provide MeeGo a lot. Compared to what I said about Maemo, point 1), 2) and 4) does not apply to MeeGo. As a side note, the three MeeGo devices that Elop suggested we would get before 2014, that's the same number as phones Apple would release if they stick to their regular one year release interval; three before 2014. Well, I'm not sure we're getting three MeeGo phones anyway. If I understand correctly the three phones Elop mentioned were planned from before he changed the strategy. I think we're getting a single MeeGo phone from Nokia. But that's just a guess. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8