![]() |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
Possibly based on their dual core version mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockchip#RK31xx_series |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
Now thats why libhybris exists... Because even if Canonical/Jolla want native Linux drivers they can't write them and instead have to use closed Android drivers. Remember that open plasmatablet? how much problem they got with hwmanufactor... Especially all those new asian companys are bad on writing techspec. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Is it 100% confirmed that jolla won't can/will release a real qwerty as other side?
Can the OS run in landscape med atm, otherwise it's an indication that no keyboard is imminent. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
for anybody who cares about X11 , i had a chat with stskeeps on irc and he pointed out that xwayland and xmir don't support opengl/egl. how many apps that affects i don't know. things like openscad are affected for sure.
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
It has landscape support, they just won't use it in many apps.
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Landscape mode is essential for the browser and e-reader for example.
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Yep, which is what I was getting at by saying "it's not their focus"...
There's always some apps that naturally work better in landscape, so it makes sense to have a basic lvl of support. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
But yes i m currently playing with it, and that's a real solution (once you have callback or threading) (http://github.com/khertan/pyotherside a version which support threading) |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Wow that was fast: KhtNotes running with pyOtherSide on N9.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4VLIXgEzSw |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
SDK Update!
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Huawei P2 and Jolla phone look similar in design, they hired the same designer from Infinity
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
You see in the new alpha SDK the new same Icons what we see on the new Videos |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
From here: https://sailfishos.org/about-license.html
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
Seriously I wonder if they really has a good business license model... I mean they have to have money to continue with nextgen device. But if no one else licensing sailfishos, Jolla will be doomed after first phone if they dont sell as crazy. As Marc already has said in some interview companys are still affraid of opensource and especially GPL. That may be a reason silica is BSD. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
I doubt "licensing Sailfish" is a good model at all. They need something else. Partnerships, etc. Mozilla for example doesn't "license" Firefox OS - it's fully open source. Still, they have partners. How exactly does it work?
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
Mozilla is a non-profit organization, so it's a completely different situation. I doubt that Jolla would want to have no profit at all ;) Plus who would choose Firefox if it wasn't free - it doesn't bring anything new or revolutionary after all... But I agree having more (partner) developers on board is a good idea, especially at this stage. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
http://kde-app.mirror.uber.com.au/ak...ilfish_OS.webm Or maybe it was this one... http://files.kde.org/akademy/2013/vi...er_and_Qt.webm The Jolla employee seemed very sure that it'll eventually become mostly open (if not 100%). Orig. source: http://files.kde.org/akademy/2013/videos/ Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
but i scares me that jolla seems to not fully have a longer strategy mens after first phone release. After all they need some kind of bussiness model especially if they go fully opensource.. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
Find the snippet I'm talking about... Of course things could change, that's always a very real (& understandable) possibility. Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Just wondering.. I have 20 pages of apps.... And how could I get quickly to the multitasking? Some pull stuff should be in the middle too.
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
A nice "other half" would be an e-ink display. One company introduced its own solution for various mobiles on the IFA:
http://www.heise.de/imgs/18/1/0/7/3/...883cd3d7f.jpeg google translated version: http://translate.google.de/translate...951841&act=url original article in german: http://heise.de/-1951841 |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
In the light of recent developments I think Jolla has a slight chance to establish itself on the market.
- The NSA leaks have shown that Android (or better the services that come along with it) is basically spyware for the american government. - Microsoft is now a hardware maker, hence others will likely refrain from doing WP phones in the future. - In general handset makers may want to become indepenent of Google services in the longer term, i.e. be able to pick whatever service-provider they'd like. Of course they could also use Ubuntu Mobile or an Android fork, however at least the latter comes with known problems. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
My concern is that i'll get a Jolla phone and afterwards Nokia will buy them and I'll be forced (again) to deal with their stupid policies. :mad:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
But I can see how it'd be appealing to some... |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
If jolla mange to release a working beta smartphone they have done a great job. To add what you expect is impossible. You need to be able to walk, before you can fly...
Time to mange the expectations, folks! |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
I tend to (somewhat) agree, but that may simply not be good enough...
Even it's the best they can do, being the tiny start-up & sw/hw/odm/oem ecosystem they are. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
1 Attachment(s)
This may have been answered before, but although I've followed Jolla news with interest, I do not have a clear picture of the issue.
Is Jolla's Sailfish and the essential applications going to be open source 100% or not? Is Jolla going to leave something with closed source licenses? I think the only way Jolla to really break through, would be to be 100% OSS and be verifiable NSA-backdoor free, and market it as such widely. If there is closed source components, then few days ago Snowden's leaked NSA's social and monetary strategies may work also in Jolla and some convenient weaknesses exist in the closed source parts of the Jolla Sailfish. Then verifiable three-letter-agencies-free OS cannot be claimed and marketed, and someone or some organization may rather choose for example Replicant Android with OSS apps. http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...on-expert-chat Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
It's not 100 percent open. It's hard to give a persentage since open means different things to different people.
Reading NSA. I wouldn't trust jolla over any other vendor. When it comes to security, you can only trust yourself. |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
The only (slight) advantage, is that vulnerabilities would be found/closed more quickly. To address your Qn, there's several threads where this has been discussed in detail, can't recall them OTTOMH. Maybe later I'll point you to them, if someone else hasn't already... Good night. *as (undoubtedly) have other govt's with large/powerful economies |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
I mean seriously, if its so important everything is open source why is there not more people comitting code, testing, sending bugreports to upstream mer and nemoprojects!? mer, sailfish malinglists should be full with poists everyday but most the time I get one or 1 mail/day. Now compare that to kate(kde editor) mailinglist or any other. So my point is start contribute to whats open before discuss about how open Jolla's apps will be... For me it seems those who want "100% open" are not even contributing in much way to what exists already. to repeat what said already, take a look here what IS open: https://github.com/nemomobile https://github.com/mer-tools and ofcourse most importantly qt: http://qt.gitorious.org And about NSA yes it sucks bigtime. But why care when most people are stupid *****s anyway and using Google, Facebook and similar wihout even think of it. Actually NSA scandal is not something new. People should had realised this WAY before that scandal and actually it will not change because most people thinks "hey USA is the good guys who cares about us" |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
Quote:
About NSA and etc. Things go way deeper than many even think. It's way beyond Google and co. already. See http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...e-surveillance |
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
How is open source more secure??
|
Re: Sailfish(Jolla): Ideas/Qns & Concerns/Criticisms
It's the more eyes principle. More people seeing the code, should mean less bugs. But admittedly that doesn't always work,or takes time to get noticed. Bad example is Debian OpenSSL messup. Interesting now with all the NSA leaks.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:42. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8