![]() |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
However, a ease-in system, like karma in some forums, kudos, etc, doesn't generate loads of pressure in return, especially if those karma points are precious and the warnings are temporary. I like the thanks system this far, but what limits it is (one) it doesn't have a reverse, so it just goes up if you insist, (two) it stays, if nobody moves the thread to off-topic, so the flame wars are quite the place to get inter-troll thanks, (three) it's free, and free stuff gets thrown around and finally (four) some people are way, way above others, for example an announce software post/thread, a piece of news, joke, racks in a 30-to-one ratio, effectively buying 60+ trolls before ratio drops. There is no rule to say a developer can't be an ... well, you know. If this system had a limit of no more than 3 thanks a day per user (maybe more with posts), it would be more precious (I have suggested this for bugzilla). Also, if infractions would be temporary suspension then the matter need not be definitely resolved. Just wait it out, for someone who gets one per week there's no loss. However, a pro troller would eat up through his reserves in a day (especially with exponential rates), reverting to a 0% karma, conveniently helping me ignore said views. For example, on some sites that have nothing to do with torrents, there are comments on pages that are not torrents of any kind. Let's assume that one sees a page with a comment that says "This page that Ndi has no intention of downloading contains a virus!!! (Karma: -2)" and another that says "This page that has nothing illegal on it is fine (Karma: +254)". See how easy it is to get decent info on completely empty pages? But, this is about closed threads, not policing methods, so I'm retiring. Additionally, I very much doubt anyone will change a working system, especially one integrated with other services. Oh, one more thing. You said that this generates defensiveness from people agreeing with modded post. This is why the system never works unless it's backed by clear rules. No OT means no OT, there is no disagreeing. If rules say ranting is OK, then ranting passes. This doesn't work for -say- poor taste. |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
So I'm not too worried about abuse of a member "civility voting system". The concerns tend to focus too much about a loud, shrill minority. And yes you and I are in alignment on addressing behavior BUT do note I'm a minor moderator here and that ultimately Reggie has been setting the tone. |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
And, to get a bit technical, any kind of change requires work with the forum code. Is work done to maintain it? Are there techies to persuade? Should I take this with Reggie instead? |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Finally, we try to cure the symptom because the cure for the cause is part jail and part execution and that sort of smells of failed management. Not that I'd cry to see some people not come back, but final decisions need a lot more effort. Plus, there's the people I hate more than the trollers, the raiders. The raider is that special kind of <profanity> that always bites at you and pushes, and kicks, until you become serious about acting, then plays straight for a while to gain sympathy from people who do not have a full list of posts. then bites. Then starts dancing around rules. Screams when warned, but as soon as the warning expires posts a thread stirring as much anger as possible. We had a case here, and after banning people still came up asking what happened to poor <>. Oh dear, you got me started again. |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
You guys are all trying to reinvent the wheel. Just making a ranking system for comments and a flagging system for threads is good enough for tiny little sites like craigslist and engadget. That includes adding a rants and raves section for both trolls AS WELL AS fanboys. Of course, this means that moderators would have to allow anger and disappointment threads, which, they have been unwilling to do. But does it matter in six months? Nope. By then, people will have already moved on to Meego and this board can return to the small niche crowd that it's used to. Someone new will pop in once in a while with the, "Hey I just bought this on ebay, does the n900 do this?" and the answer is, "Nope, one guy was working on it and he quit." The opportunity to make a "community" died when Nokia quit. Maemo could have said, "You know what, f*ck them. Nokia orphaned us, we don't need them. Let's make an effort to port or develop as many apps for maemo as possible, so that when Meego users come back here for apps, we can tell them, 'Sure you can have somegreatapp.DEB, just flash your phone to maemo6.'" |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
I sure don't mind a section devoted to venting. Granted it only addresses the surface of the issues, but many times that's all some people are after anyway. So yeah, if we had such a "quarantined" section I'd have no problem with allowing those threads there. But I get the idea Reggie disagrees. |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Quote:
Why do you think Reggie disagrees? Because we have not heard from him? Or has something else or some other communications made you think this? I would love to hear what Reggie has to say on the subject. |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
Allow me to ask this... what does Nokia feel/say/think about this community becoming as disenfranchised - even in bits - about the prior Maemo 5 iteration being cut at the knees in terms of updating to the next iteration of their Linux based OS for their phones?
I mean, if they lose a percentage of this forum, they lose the people that would evangelize the Maemo/MeeGo platform for them... for free. I doubt they have even taken notice of what's going on; but to have people that work at Nokia hang around here and not take notice of how some folks are just.. not happy right now. How will that lend itself to the next OS iteration? Fancy bells and whistles, hardware can only satisfy so many people. Support, communication and a community that's not in disarray (even if it's only bits right now, this could be seen as the tipping point) do not help a company. The thread closings, the rank anger, the "trolls", well-established members not being happy... those things don't work well for an up and coming release. Oh... and the solution for threads where folks get riled up? One part is in place... "Off Topic" already exists. Change the description to something more of an area where the "law" is as loose as the tongues in that area. Reggie already pulled that area's ability to update the front page of ITT and the side bar here. And threads that are volatile, move them there. No need for commentary from the person that moves it other than "Moved from X to Y, <link to Forum Rules>" and go from there. With that said... I would love to hear what Nokia thinks on this subject. |
Re: Sick of all the closing threads
I was wondering. Can anyone break it down for me? You know the details of it?
Maemo Devices is a subdivision of Nokia? Who decides on the Hardware? Who decides on the software? Will Maemo Devices become Meego Devices? Will the people Meego/Maemo like move into a building or they'll just work remotely?. Maybe someone can point me to a historical record. Like the your latest blog post Textrat. That was quite informative. Is there really a support forum from Nokia for the n900? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:22. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8