![]() |
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
I've sent sulu a PM, hopefully he can e-mail me the packages and I can post them in qole.org/files for everyone to grab. Hopefully, too, I can make a new image using these packages...
|
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
The solution that sulu arrived at is very similar to my solution. He built fake new packages with old files, I installed the new files and then overwrote the new files with the old files. I like sulu's method better, because Debian really thinks it has the newest version... We should do that for gconf too.
|
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
Ok, please find sulu's hacked pulseaudio packages here.
|
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
I noticed that for some reason my packages although having the same version number seem to be considered upgradeable by synaptic. It showed me that there's an update for pulseaudio. In a first test I changed the Debian revision from 1 to 99 which solved the issue and should leave enough tolerance for future revisions made by Debian.
@qole: I'll send you new packages tomorrow. |
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
In completely unrelated news, I just remembered that I needed to promote my newer versions to Extras-testing. So if you get a moment, please vote for the latest versions of Easy Chroot and Easy Debian that have been languishing in Extras-devel for months now...
|
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
Thank qole and sulu, and I just can't wait to hear news how programs from Squeeze work with "fake" gconf2 version...
|
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
After having had a closer look at the dependencies I think changing the revision number would not be a good idea because some packages depend on one exact version of another package. Of course I could adjust the dependencies of all the packages I changed but then I'd also have to repackage other related packages just because of the dependencies while they technically work fine and I don't know where that would end.
So I'd suggest we stay with the current set of packages and just set them on hold. Edit: I just completed the pulseaudio instructions in the wiki article. |
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
Just a brainwave concerning the gconf2 problem that I never encountered so far:
Usually I start Debian applications from within a fully loaded Easy Debian (with LXDE) and not via debbie. However, today I started Iceweasel via debbie and got this error message: Quote:
For verification I loaded the original unchanged Easy Debian image and did not get that message so obviously something has changed in the gconf-dbus communication. I googled a bit and found some posts (also involving hal) that suggest that it might be a permission problem. Well, I'm certainly not an expert, neither with hal nor with dbus or gconf but as a shot in the dark I started iceweasel via debbie and sudo in my dist-upgraded image: Code:
debbie sudo iceweasel Edit: Oh, btw and totally unrelated: I think adding pipe to .xbindkeysrc would be nice: Code:
"xvkbd -xsendevent -text '|'" |
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
I also use most applications through LXDE (ho ever, I actually run Iceweasel via shortcut, which is debbie equivalent).
The problem with gconf2 is (was?) much worse - last time I checked, after installation of LibreOffice I got 3/4 of application menus unusable (blank "----" lines or unspecified characters instead of proper text). This is the symptom I remember from top of my head, qole would be - probably - capable of more techie explanation. |
Re: Easy Debian Fremantle Beta Testing
I didn't encounter the problem you describe. My menus are just fine.
Afaik lxpanel just reads the contents of /usr/share/applications without any man in the middle. However gconf2 might have messed up that directory when you tried. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8