![]() |
Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
Quote:
|
Re: Major speedup for Fennec after PR1.2
Standard 600MHz N900 running default (mozilla?) browser: 8856
Looking forward to using PR1.2 :) |
Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
Half baked or not, the leaked PR1.1.947723499823 is better than the PR1.1.1.
Some thing which I really like are: 1. Phone app orientation can be fixed to landscape or portrait and it works. 2. Can hold the key to get it to type the blue symbol. 3. Proper back button in browser. 4. 90MB free rootfs with many apps and all repositories enabled. It makes me more excited about the upcoming official release. :) |
Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
Quote:
PR 1.2 IS NOT RELEASED YET! LEAKED VERSION IS UNFINISHED More who created threads :mad: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...d=1#post639481 http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...384#post638384 |
Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
No not disappointing. PR1.2 is great!
I second the findings of buxz777 and other users saying it works well. The MicroB browser now handles certain complicated websites better without complaints and the back button greatly enhances the surfing comfort. Flashing or not? It doesn't seem to be dangerous unless the next and final firmware will ALSO no longer flash the GSM radio correctly. It is up to you. I remember this to be deemed a tweakers phone, and if you really are a tweaker flashing the thing to ashes in an attempt to reach the highest ... should be your greatest joy. Some of the whiners (?) are now calling people idiots for flashing their devices. They exaggerate a little and if it weren't for those daring idiots they wouldn't have any wisdom to spray around right now. |
Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
Quote:
|
Re: What works better in the PR1.2
Quote:
It was caused by OM Weather widget. Not sure why, the widget was on my 4th Desktop since PR1.1.1. Now, after I remove the widget, it was OK, then I re-add again, it was still OK. Probably there is some changes from previous version that cause some instability/incompatibility. |
Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
Quote:
|
Re: What works better in the PR1.2
Any improvements for the camera?
Does it still give you hazy images? http://forums.internettablettalk.com...ad.php?t=36675 It's my biggest dissapointment, and i hope they'd fix it |
Re: Is PR1.2 RC disappointing?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:08. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8