![]() |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
But those binaries from google are redistributable methinks. There is a license file in the archive, just check it. And on TI site here https://gforge.ti.com/gf/project/openmax/frs/ are much more goodies. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
@pali: [off-topic] - check osso-calculator on gitorious please
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
@freemangordon:
Will the patch with all options be pushed to the repositories? Or can we install it easily other ways? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
- wget -o outputs log info - you need wget -O - dpkg -l | grep multiboot will detect if multiboot _had_ been installed but has been removed - use: dpkg -l | grep "ii multiboot" So the script should look like: Code:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
sorry for off topic |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
Because they're doing great things for this community doesn't mean we don't have questions how to use it... |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Is kernel-power-headers required as well?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
AFAIK headers are needed only for developers. One time, I uninstalled them and just doing this increased my rootfs by 15 MB (!). Everything works fine without it, obviously.
BTW - do they *need* to reside in rotfs, instead of optfs, if they're installed anyway? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
But why you asking next question then? Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Yes, -headers package is not for installing into n900. It is only for scratchbox or for unpacking on desktop mashine for develop.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Headers can be installed on device if you're compiling kernel modules on device. Headers do not need to be on rootfs, but they need to be symlinked from rootfs back to where they originally were on rootfs, so that the compiler can find them correctly. (Alternatively you could change the compiler's search paths for libs, but I don't know how to do that.)
I do this with all of the contents of most large packages that I install (and I have my optfs partitioned to 9GB, so there's more room for stuff). |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
I think this is irrelevant. -headers package is not in user/ section, so it dont have to be in /opt. Original kernel-headers is in sdk repository and extras has not section sdk...
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
recently installed v48, kernel itself and my mm-100 bluetooth headset works, thanks for your work pali!
I hoped, with v48 I'll be able to boot into meego (sdhc) again, unfortunately I can't. Does that only work with u-boot? Or do I have to install multiboot on meego to? Or is it, that you didn't put a necessary flag somewhere? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
I think this should be added to first post
Install in sequence: 1. kernel-power_1:2.6.28-10power48_armel.deb 2. kernel-power-modules_1:2.6.28-10power48_armel.deb 3. kernel-power-flasher_1:2.6.28-10power48_armel.deb 4. kernel-power-settings_0.12_armel.deb 5. reboot |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
It may be only me - but better to check anyway. If someone can deny auto-installing it with kernel (which is most likely, looking @ dependencies), just ignore this post. Just want to be sure, that we're not facing any repo-dependencies related bug ;) |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
Ray |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
I tried it and it works perfect. No mess with multiboot and nitdroid. Slider open boots up Meego and run noloboot gives me the multiboot menu with default kernel, power48, Nitdroid and BackupMenu. I can post a small guide when I'm back home. Greetz, J4ZZ |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
After couple of days, battery is still a hit for sure unlike v46. But it seems a little better over v47. With heavy use and xlv profile running at 900 gave me little less than 6 hrs. With nominal use and xlv profile running at 900 gave me abt 10 hrs which is quite acceptable.
Now two things i notice, one it is taking longer for battery to charge and two there are sudden drops in battery power towards the end. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
is this fully stable yet? it dint hit the repos yet:S
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Installed... For now, no problem.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
is it in the repo yet?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
No, I install it manually
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Here's a small guide to add u-boot to power48.
1st: Install all packages from 1st post Code:
dpkg -i kernel-power_1:2.6.28-10power48_armel.deb Code:
uname -r Then follow up this little guide ;) (Thx to [DarkGUNMAN] and Fabry's guide of patching power-kernel with u-boot) Open Terminal: Code:
sudo gainroot Code:
apt-get install -y wget flasher mkimage Code:
wget http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pali/kernel-power_1:2.6.28-10power48_armel.deb -O kernel-power_2.6.28-10power48_armel.deb Code:
wget http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/fremantle/free/u/u-boot-for-power-kernel/u-boot-for-power-kernel_1.0_all.deb -O u-boot-for-power-kernel_1.0_all.deb Code:
flasher -u -F zImage-2.6.28.10-power48.fiasco Code:
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 80008000 -e 80008000 -n "Power Kernel v48" -d zImage uImage Code:
dd if=uImage of=vmlinuz-2.6.28.10-power48 seek=448 Code:
rm zImage Code:
softupd -vv -s --local Code:
flasher --local -f -k /home/user/vmlinuz-2.6.28.10-power48 Code:
mv /boot/zImage-2.6.28.10-power48 /boot/multiboot/vmlinuz-2.6.28.10-power48-bak If you have old power47 or double power48 entries open Filebox and navigate to /etc/multiboot.d to delete the respecting *.item files. #10. Reboot and watch the http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-Fresh_tux.png !!! :D Edit: I coloured the code for those who don't know what goes together and what not. So, each colored lines are a complete string where to hit 'Enter' after. I left the obvious ones untouched ;) Greetz, J4ZZ |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
when I had an N900 the only problem I noticed is that sometimes when recording a video the preview broke. am not sure why. it also corrupted the video files created. am not sure if this is the cause of the camera ui 2 or this update since I dont usually use video recording
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
Thanks J4ZZ,
i know the procedure, but if i get these lines right, we have to decompress the kernel image, put some files in it, compress it a little different, flash, tell the bootloader "hey, there's another kernel" and get it going. Very long procedure. Well, i'm more into grub and lilo, but afaik it's quite easy to compile the kernel u-boot ready, or do I get this wrong? Could be, that this would make the kernel depend on u-boot, but I don't think this is a huge problem. atm it's just easier to switch between v48 and the u-boot-ready v46 i think. There will be further kernel updates and we would have to do this again and again. I'd appreciate it, if non-geeks would be able to test meego to, write bugreports and such stuff... Or could it be, that this u-boot or multiboot could be changed to "hey, look if there's a bootable OS on the sd card and boot it"? I did this sometimes on my laptop when I broke grub. I don't get why this is all so complicated - afaik the bootloader just points to vmlinuz and that's it - do I get this wrong? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
This starts uboot - open keyboard boots from sdcard. Closed keyboard boots power48.
If multiboot is installed, slide keyboard open when you see Staring Kernel to show multiboot |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
First of all thanks Pali, sublime work! It works very well
Ok guys I wanna ask you a question that's been haunting me for weeks Everyone knows that the enhaced open standard profile that iPods and almost every cellphone nowadays use for 3,5'' jack isn't actually bundled into the Maemo ecosystem, so you can't control the cellphone by wired remote neither talk by wired hands-free. Is this a software problem, that could be patched? Or is this a hardware limitation? If the first answer is yes, could this be patchable in a kernel release? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power v48
of course you can: http://www.sennheiser.com/sennheiser...e_music_504111
but don't hijack this thread! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8