![]() |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Windows 8.1 RT = Metro start tiles - Desktop + unified mobile non x86 store (labeled as such) Windows 8.1 Pro = Metro + Desktop + x86 store (labeled as such) Windows 8.x Phone = Metro start tiles + unified mobile non x86 store (labeled as such) Windows 2012 Server = Metro (optional, I personally HATE it on Server) + Desktop + Powershell + x86 store + MSDN Drop non-Pro Windows OS, only Windows 8.1 Pro. |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
It's too early to say, it sounds like they've got some major changes planned for RT, I'll hold final judgment till then.
But yeah, so far Win 8 tablets are looking way more interesting to me... |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
Quote:
I hate to say that I failed miserably. Yes, there are options, but at least here in the UK the reality is such that a new laptop without Windows is at least 20% more expensive than the equivalent with Windows on. In my case it translates to saving about £150 by giving part of it to Microsoft. Much as I hate myself for that, I took those 150 pieces of silver and now I pay for it with my frustration with Windows 8's huge step back in terms of usability. I understand the economics of it: OS-free or Linux-preinstlled laptops sell in much smaller quantities through small companies who cannot afford to push the prices down the way the behemoths like Dell do. But the point is that yes, people will continue using Windows. Not necessarily through conscious choice but through a perceived lack of other options. |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
Quote:
Therefore Android (Cyanogen/Replicant) could actually be a working solution and I was not fully joking when I said Nokia should just leak instructions (via Tor) how step-by-step Android can be installed to their tablet-device. @mikecomputing: Just start making Qt-apps to Android while waiting some other Linux variant (, which you'd like more, and me too perhaps) is really alive. Android-devices are good, they just work, although they are not perfect. |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
Quote:
|
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
When you purchase a new Windows PC it often comes preloaded with a 30 day demo of software a, b and c and a lite version of software x, y and z. The vendors of those programs pay large volume manufacturers to preinstall them on new PCs and cummulatively those payments add up to more than the cost of an OEM Windows license.
Although it irritates me that PCs invariably come with Windows preinstalled the 'Windows Tax' to the end user is actually probably zero. If you're determined to get an OS free PC in the UK ebuyer's Zoostorm range are the best I know of. For laptops they only seem to have pink in available at the moment but I think it looks a decent spec for the money. |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
Quote:
|
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
>Ever heard of plasmaactive?
Plasma Active is not based on a "Normal desktop Linux". It is based on Mer, which is a mobile optimised Linux. You are simply helping zimon make his point. |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
Quote:
Apps with a touchscreen UX. http://www.appbrain.com/stats/number-of-android-apps Quote:
Android's SDK and Java language apparently just works. It is relatively easy to make scalable apps with those, so lower and higher level hw is supported w/o too much hassle, and small & big screen sizes. Qt enables the above also, but it is more difficult and bad programmers can mess things up easily. I very much doubt, if there ever will be even 20% of touch screen UX Qt apps compared to number of Android apps. |
Re: Microsoft buying Nokia's devices & services
Microsoft buying Nokia?
The vision is realized..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI_xu...r_embedded#t=1 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:25. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8