![]() |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Half (2/3?) of things You mentioned wasn't touched since kp49, but it's still nice to hear that You have so positive experience ;)
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
I remember thinking about an upgrade to KP49 for a long time, and looking back, I'm not positive I actually made the effort to upgrade it. :) Either way, I'm certainly glad I did finally upgrade to this one! |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Still running v48, having no problems at all in doing what i want to do with the n900.
Overclocked Running smooth. Never longer than a day from power cord. i wonder, did i overlooked any good reason to install v50 (considering 'don't fix anything when not broken' adagium)? regards drax |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Pointless question - check changelog and decide Yourself.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
The turning point for me was SmartReflex.. I wanted to see if it would bring any benefit in my (low) usage pattern, so I went ahead and installed KP50. I can now say that (1) it didn't break anything, (2) VDD1 and VDD2 on gave me a 10-15% improvement in time between charges. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
aware of v50 is in dev rep? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
hey all, after d recent update, i observed that my kernel configurations are not stable ie they keep changing from the limits i set:250 805 to 125 850....what seems to be d issue?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
harry, I think that typically happens after weird things done by battery patch, which has a thread where such things can be discussed.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8