![]() |
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
Quote:
So the information posted here is not valid, as they wrote that article without a hands-on device. The article was written by pure fantasy and dreams! |
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
|
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
- I think your N9 is broken (if you bought several, several were). Multitasking works great on mine, I wish iOS could do basic things like start loading a website, go elsewhere, come back and the website is loaded. If that's impossible because of "battery life", well ok, make a better OS. Not my fault that Apple sucks at making technology lately. The N9's battery life outlives iOS's, and I use the N9 _way more_ than the iPhone - Have you tried swype? iOS doesn't give you that option and is critical if you ever use your phone with one hand. Like, use the _mobile_ phone while walking for example... kind of using a mobile device to be mobile, right? - I believe iOS's mail app is the worst that I tried so far, and I use N9's. 99% of the time I read my emails on the phone, that's something that iOS can't do properly [on IMAP] - I disagree that iOS has been king for 7 years, I think my Nokia 5800 has always been better than my iPhone 4 at everything I use the iPhone for |
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
|
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
I hope you've got your vest on. |
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
I think we've seen lots of evidence already (just in how the interrelated projects have evolved) that they're very different to how Nokia behaved. But yes, there's still some question marks over the degree of openness (which isn't just about blind/regular code dumps ofc) in some areas. Quote:
Most of the people trying it, aren't actually contributing a single thing, they install it for a while, find they can't do SFA, rant/rave, & then remove it. It's a good publicity exercise, it's resulted in far more visibility for ubuntu touch than sailfish (& ubuntu touch already benefits from ubuntu's brand in other form-factors), not really dev progress though. That's one thing Shuttleworth has in spades, marketing/spin instinct. There's still some question marks over that advisory group, it's more about "keeping up appearances" than any real progress*. More significantly, they still don't have any hardware partners, that's what needs to be lined-up pretty soon... Quote:
*which in itself can serve a purpose, & be good strategising |
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
jalyst,
The flipped images being offered by Ubuntu recently are all about booting into Ubuntu with Android in the chroot so they are certainly on the path to where they want to go but questions remain about, among other things, the feasibility of them arriving by their self-set deadlines... |
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
But agreed, the time-lines they've set for themselves have [largely] been VERY ambitious... |
Re: JollaMobile : Jolla continues Nokia's excellent work on #MeeGo based smartphones
Quote:
- Jolla won't need to sell millions of devices to be successful [in the short/mid term], so they can take certain liberties. - Firefox is tricky since they are funded partly by Google... not sure how they'll expect money back from their Firefox OS, perhaps just licensing? In which case, how much do they need to sell to be successful and continue their work? - Ubuntu: not sure about how big they are and what their success goals are. Again, they don't seem to be selling any device, so money-wise maybe it's just licensing? - Tizen: I'm pretty sure Samsung will want to sell millions of devices running this for a certian period of time to justify their investment. For what it's worth, I hope all of them will be a success and in consequence continue with their work, we certainly need more options rather than fewer. Will developers have to maintain more versions of their software? Well, yes, so what? It's been like that for years... maybe it will get better with standards, but for now that's totally understandable. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8