maemo.org - Talk
Page 3 of 36 12 3 4513 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Competitors (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak) (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=33251)

javispedro 2009-10-21 16:16
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by c0rt3x (Post 354099)
Android = Capacitive
What has an operating system to do with a device's touchscreen technology? I doubt Android cares whether its input device is resistive, capacitive, a mouse, banging your head on the wall or just voice commands (as long as it can provide an absolute x,y coordinate and a boolean "click" value).

Quote:
Originally Posted by flux41 (Post 354115)
Capacitive screen... Ok that is nice, but is it really the only reason why this device is even being considered?
Being unconsidered.

c0rt3x 2009-10-21 16:21
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by javispedro (Post 354120)
What has an operating system to do with a device's touchscreen technology? I doubt Android cares whether its input device is resistive, capacitive, a mouse, banging your head on the wall or just voice commands (as long as it can provide an absolute x,y coordinate and a boolean "click" value).
What has an operating system to do with a device's CPU technology? Yet Android 1.5 only allowed one model (not only limited to a specific CPU type, but also to a special model). The Qualcomm MSM 7201A 528 MHz processor.

javispedro 2009-10-21 16:25
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by c0rt3x (Post 354130)
What has an operating system to do with a device's CPU technology?
Everything? :confused:

Either way, there have been multiple Android devices with different touch screen technologies and with different processors, so the point is moot.

c0rt3x 2009-10-21 16:32
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by javispedro (Post 354140)
Everything? :confused:

Either way, there have been multiple Android 1.5 phones with different touch screen technologies and with different processors, so the point is moot.
[Too short message]

;)

javispedro 2009-10-21 16:38
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
And a N810 running Android 1.0 . And the first devices (BEFORE the G1) to run Android were all resistive .

DaveP1 2009-10-21 16:57
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 353985)
I can't call that "what the N900 should have been". Who wants a phone that big, except maybe on their desk?
Me. If it has a usable on screen keyboard this device could work as a computer and is not too big to pocket. To my mind, the N900, while it has a real keyboard (which I prefer), has a screen that is just too small to work as a computer for long.

There's a bit more information in the SlashGear post:

http://www.slashgear.com/dell-streak...leaks-2161220/

UCOMM 2009-10-21 16:58
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
4.1 is pushing it for a phone, 5 is just plain stupid

3.7/8 and i'd be happy

cheetos316 2009-10-21 17:19
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
Just because it ships with Android doesn't mean that another OS can't run on it right? Would it be possible to flash it to run something like Maemo?

ioioio 2009-10-21 17:31
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by javispedro (Post 354087)
Capacitive screen. Eeek.
If it makes no difference expense wise or battery wise (in a perfect world), you want a capacitive screen, makes a huge difference in terms of usability. You can't accomplish the same things on a resistive screen.

ioioio 2009-10-21 17:32
Re: Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheetos316 (Post 354239)
Just because it ships with Android doesn't mean that another OS can't run on it right? Would it be possible to flash it to run something like Maemo?
In theory it can run any embedded OS, but who's going to go through with porting it, writing device drivers for it, and who knows what else.


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:32.
Page 3 of 36 12 3 4513 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8