Re: N900 Thickness
 

Wait your saying the n900 isn't the best Nokia could do even though it the best looking phone Nokia has produced in years which I might add the best keyboard they have produced in years (rivals the HTC pro2 apparently).

Re: N900 Thickness
 

It's 19.5mm on at the point where the postage stamp sized buldge for the camera is. Everywhere else it's 18mm. So basically it's 18mm.

I didn't really see the sarcasm in your post. It seemed like you were claiming basically the N900 is thicker because it packs more features in it. And I was trying to point out that it's not really obvious the thickness can be explained that way. I think the comparison to the N97 and N97-mini is especially telling. This is after all a thread about why the N900 is as thick as it is, not about why the N900 is better than the Droid or why you should get the N900 over the Droid or vice-versa.

Re: N900 Thickness
 

Oh one more thing
1mm for the infra red
1mm for the front facing camera

Mike C

Re: N900 Thickness
 

1mm for resistive touchscreen.. yeah!!

Re: N900 Thickness
 

Without the space for the stylus, they could have easily fitted a 'wider' battery.

Re: N900 Thickness
 

How easily? Any calculations or projects?

Re: N900 Thickness
 

My opinion on some of the points made here.

Battery:
Unless you have used the N900 extensively, complaining that they didn't use a better battery is silly.

Consider that by using the same battery as previous models it saves Nokia money not having to design and manufacture a new battery. Even better, once the battery dies it shouldn't be too hard finding an official replacement so no worries buying poor knock-offs or worse, not being able to find that specific model at all.

So its a win win situation, as long as the N900 has reasonable battery life (which by all reports, it does) then Nokia made a good choice. Stick to a tried and tested battery, avoid all the cost and risk of developing something new.

Keyboard:
It never fails to amaze me how people under value a good keyboard.

I would much rather have a thicker device with a keyboard with decent button travel than a thinner device where you get poor response. I had a lot of problems with my Xperia X1 keyboard because it didn't have enough travel on the buttons. The layout was excellent (although the size awkard due to the device being too narrow), like the Droid, but a good layout with poor response is useless. The Droid keyboard at least in the photos looks really cheap.

Speakers:
This one should be obvious, the bigger the device the better the sound quality can be. If you mount tiny speakers flush to the case you get tinny sound and minimal volume, but if you allow a little space you can drastically improve both loudness and bass response.

Again, the Xperia X1 was super quiet and tinny (I could never hear it ring in my pocket) because they favoured design over functionality. The slit for the audio was microscopic, if they had made it a little wider they could have had amazing sound. In fact everything about the X1 was style over functionality and the reason I sold it and switched to the N900 was because it seemed to fix these problems.

Thinner is better:
It really isn't. I do love my iPod Touch for being the ideal screen/device size vs pocket-ability but I find it far too thin to handle at times. Many times I have come close to dropping it because its so thin and light.

Multi-touch:
You ever tried doing multi-touch actions when you only have one hand free? Its a lot easier to do the clockwise/counter-clockwise motion the N900 uses than mutli-touch so once portrait mode works in the browser, it will kick the iPod/iPhones *** for one handed usage.

After using the iPod Touch extensively I find mostly I use it portrait. Wait, isn't that a negative for the N900? Perhaps for now, but I find also that I do not use multi-touch for the same reason so one of the biggest selling points of competing devices is null and void.

So overall, devices like the Droid do not seem so brilliant anymore, at least to me.

Re: N900 Thickness
 

Look at how Nokia released the n95 NAM model. Its essentially the same size as the original n95 but with BL-6F 1200 mAh which is slighly larger battery instead of the BL-5F 950 mAh.

If Nokia can squeeze the BP-4L into the E71 and n97 (which doesn't hold the stylus) then I'm sure the Nokia engineers could have achieved this.

Re: N900 Thickness
 

If you're one of those people that can't go along using only a virtual keyboard, then thickness shouldn't be a problem. I just can't see myself constantly typing on a touch screen keyboard, can't stand those things. I much prefer having a thicker phone but with a full QWERTY keyboard, and the N900's keyboard look quite nice.

Re: N900 Thickness
 

SIM card slot