![]() |
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
Quote:
|
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
Quote:
|
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
have you ever bought a tv? you can run through all the stats, lcd vs plasma vs dlp, 1080p, contrast, reaction time, blah blah blah. it dont mean much til you see the quality, screens may look good on paper and suck in real life. its not philosophy its common sense and good advice. you want to know which is best then have a look yourself.
|
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
Agree with festivaslnut.
I have a 37" HD ready LCD toshiba from 5 years ago, cost my ALOT. My brother just bought a new Philips Full HD 42" with great specs, cost almost as much as my toshiba did (which is a lot today). The Toshiba is much more fun to watch, and the philips is odd with all the video smoothing and who knows what algorithms they run to improve the picture. Facts are the toshiba with 5 years old technology pawns the super new philips with cutting edge led panel. |
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
You have to try them. Head to head test. The N900 is not good in bright sunlight.
|
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
Quote:
Discussion over. Go back to sleep. |
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
god! Of all the people who posted here... @.@ the OP was asking your personal choice. That's it nothing more nothing less. Why bother typing so much words instead of typing the device name of your choice.
BTW for me it's n900 when it comes to screen, pixel count matters. On image printing? That's a different story. |
Re: Traditional TFT LCD of the N900 and the new SLCD !
Exactly ! I know Amoled is way to ahead in terms of technology and being the next generation of Display screens so the screen of N900 cannot be a match to it. But how is S-LCD in terms of display when compared with the N900.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8