![]() |
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
I would have no problem stuffing a 4gb card specifically for MaemoMapper if it provided those functions. I think ease of use, and routing should be your targets for 2.0! Concerning the database style... I wouldn't mind moving forward and just going with the one file. I've found moving thousands of files back and forth to be painful for my memory cards and I wouldn't miss any merging benefits the old style provides. |
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
I will start with a Maemo-specific design, since that is my priority, and I'll just keep in mind that I'll want it to (someday) work with normal GTK as well. Then, I'll change the maemo-specific bits to build differently depending on the target environment. |
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
As others have mentioned, the existence of an alternative doesn't refute the desire for a free, open source solution. If that were the case, Maemo Mapper never would have come about in the first place, as GpsDrive had already been ported to maemo. |
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
I'm still investigating alternatives, though. Someone mentioned CDB, but that's less useful in a constantly-changing map cache scenario. Maemo Mapper already uses sqlite3, so if I can reuse it for the map cache (POI would still be in a separate database) with sufficient performance, I will prefer to do that. sqlite3 (or any relational database, for that matter) could also give me the opportunity to implement more complex features, such as "aging out" (based on either time or fixed-disk-space) of older, not-recently-accessed maps . I'm also open to suggestions. |
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
|
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
It sounds like most people don't care too much about that drawback, though, so I'll just release a FS-to-DB converter, and that will be that. Quote:
|
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
I also vote for the database style map storage. The "one file per tile" just is too much of a burden for the file system.
Feature request: Can you add selectable "smart" auto scale function to the Mapper? How this might work is that the zoom level depends on either: 1) Speed: Maybe at highway cruising speed the screen would cover approx. 5 minutes (selectable?) of travel. Once the speed increase/decrease the map zooms automatically. (However, stop and go traffic might become problematic...) 2) Approaching waypoint/turn: The map zooms in automatically so that the turn can be seen in the screen with maximum detail. For example once the waypoint is within the 5 minutes window (as in 1 above), this zoom function takes over so that the waypoint is always seen in the screen. Just one idea that could be automated, which I found doing manually when traveling with the MaemoMapper... |
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
John, I would like to know (either you ever want to do it or not*) how it would be possible to calculate routes offline, given that MM just loads images that could be highways and streets but could be also 2-century old maps, or satellite images (on which the streets are quite hard to identify on zooms less than 2 or 3).
Will we ever see something like this? *I say this because lots of people are asking for it, and because it is already into the garage feature request, despite I usually download my route instantly through the phone or the day before, through my internet connection at home. |
Re: Plans for Maemo Mapper v2.0
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8