![]() |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
About 6 months OC@900Mhz(max; 500 min) with stock voltage, undervolting (as in "ideal profile") caused video recording failures, at least in 1.2. No problems at all but it once "reboot unexpectedly" when decompressing a couple GB tar.gz file, maybe it overheated or violated some memory region, don't know.
Performance boost is really noticeable, specially psx4m games really need OC. Also some rmvb videos. |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
hi..i was running with ideal constantly 900 Mhz.it was perfect, the reason is that Im in work all time on gprs connection (web,facebook,skype), calls, sms, emails...and for this usage it was really fine. but im worried if it did not short the lifetime of processor.what do you think abou it..the temperature was max 35°C..
|
Re: overclocking (or not) census
here is my profile
Code:
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - CREATE A COPY OF IT FOR CUSTOMIZATION in high and long usage all works fine and smooth :) including flash videos ;) and i will never ever go to the normal state xD my battery stands for 1 day @ high useage i'm fine with my profile my n900 likes it, too :D Greetz Erazor |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
/*OFF OPIC*/
Quote:
Outrageous? Absurd? :confused: First of all, I was only speculating, I was not "quite sure": I didn't say "I know that everyone overclock", and I didn't say "I am sure that the majority of us is overclocking", I only expressed my thought (I said "I think") and tried to explain it. Instead, you are sure that I was wrong, and that my error was otrageus: on which bases do you think I could have been outrageus? Maybe what I think is absurd as you said (I don't think so, maybe it's simply not true: this poll will show us), but not otrageus. Why are you so angry? Btw, I didn't say 1.1GHz, but 1GHz: 100MHz of difference are important when talking about a 600MHz processor :p /*OFF TOPIC END*/ |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
I have been running this profile for months now:
MINFREQ=125 MAXFREQ=900 FREQS="0:22,90 250:28,180 500:29,360 550:32,400 600:34,430 700:41,430 750:42,430 805:45,430 850:46,500 900:49,500 950:52,500 1000:55,500 1100:63,520 1150:69,520 " SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0 SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0 GOVERNOR=ondemand IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1 UP_THRESHOLD=75 SAMPLING_RATE=150000 POWERSAVE_BIAS=0 |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
current kernel configuration:
current frequency: 900 supported frequencies: 125 250 500 550 600 700 750 805 850 900 950 1000 1100 1150 min. frequency: 900 max. frequency: 900 avoid frequencies: 125 250 active frequencies: 0:25,90 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520 SmartReflex VDD1=0, VDD2=0 governor ondemand: ignore nice load= 1, up threshold= 75, sampling rate= 150000, powersave bias= 0 thats it...what do you think? |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
Quote:
thats a way to heavy :D |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
Quote:
|
Re: overclocking (or not) census
It only heats up under load. It can be running at 900Mhz comfortably without issue so long as there is zero load on it. Once load is applied and it starts to have worker threads that's when the heat starts to build up as the current starts to pass through it.
Although I do side with the idea of maybe turning min frequency down to about 500Mhz. |
Re: overclocking (or not) census
Quote:
this wasn't the only reason for the poll, but it was a biggy. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:04. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8