maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ? (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=17727)

Bundyo 2008-03-29 10:30

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
3) is most probable, since the time loss to release a N800 image will be negligible, and will surely make Nokia look better in the eyes of the community after the 770 drop. ;)

Or at least i want to think that way :)

Jaffa 2008-03-29 10:32

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Agreed: anything else would be crazy. But not all decisions a company makes can be considered "sane" ;-)

GeneralAntilles 2008-03-29 11:56

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaffa (Post 161931)
1) It'll possibly be the last for the N810 too, since they're effectively the same h/w.

Could happen . . . but it seems extremely unlikely, as that'll mean support for the WiMAX N810* will last less than a year, and we all know exactly how big the riots will be if that happens. ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaffa (Post 161931)
2) The N800 will get dropped, but the N810 won't. The Hacker Editions are bound to be easier to produce, though.

Nokia's insanity could play into letting this happen, but, if there's any sane reasoning going on in there, it wont. Support for the N810 is free support for the N800, so making us unpack the FIASCO image and flash each piece individually seems to be about the dumbest thing they could do. This is Nokia, though. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaffa (Post 161931)
3) The N800 will get upgrades as long as the N810 does, probably into Elephanta at least.

This is what I see happening (though if 4.2 ends up being called Elephanta and support ends there I'm really gonna have to get serious about that trout walloping expedition). They have to know dropping support for the N810 after just a year (even less for the WiMAX version) will get them into just as much trouble as they did with the 770—more, even, since they effectively promised us it wouldn't happen again (in spirit if not, now, technically) and there are a lot more people to piss off now.

*Can we agree on a good abbreviation for the Nokia N810 Internet Tablet with WiMAX™ now? I'm really not interested in typing out "WiMAX N810", "WiMAX tablet" or "WiMAX version" for much longer. Would N810W work?

Jaffa 2008-03-29 11:59

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles (Post 161956)
Can we agree on a good abbreviation for the Nokia N810 Internet Tablet with WiMAX™ now? I'm really not interested in typing out "WiMAX N810", "WiMAX tablet" or "WiMAX version" for much longer. Would N810W work?

I've used N810WE at least once - that's closest to the actual (presumably trademarked) full name of "N810 WiMAX Edition".

So I'd go for a consensus of N810W or N810WE.

GeneralAntilles 2008-03-29 12:07

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaffa (Post 161957)
So I'd go for a consensus of N810W or N810WE.

But extra letters are <sheep>baaaaad</sheep>. :p

Anyway, here's the poll.

cdmackay 2008-03-29 12:38

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
is it possible that the n810w will have anything worthwhile for those of us in the UK? i.e. without wimax?

ARJWright 2008-03-30 22:34

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Nice thread. Just wanted to jump in here seeing that I've had my fill and so many of you have contributed a lot towards my learning of the OS side of the IT life.
----

Been doing some homework so to speak, looks as if this might be part of a further reaching play by Nokia. My thoughts are this:
- engage the Linux community to play, highlight those folks doing considerable work
- release three devices similar in most of the hardware configuration, but different enough to hit different audiences - effectively making hardware abstract and the software the driver (of innovation, service, purpose)
- then price accordingly with the want of people to be connected and the state of digital networks to come

If that's the case, then effectively step 3 of Nokia's plan could be a 3 device strategy, step 4 a services one, and step 5 the mouth dropping tid bit that has been alluded to in various spots here.

Kinda exciting, but like many of you, the wait and specualtion are killers.
---------

Would love to see Diablo (a 4.1 not a 5) introduce some consistency in the UI across the default and some of the included 3rd party apps. Matching up with the FF3 engine should be something done, but I wonder how much can be done seeing where that project is at this point (at least one more beta and a release candidate or two I would think before final).

And thinking of the slight hardware tweaks of the N800 to N810, the N810WE (or N830 as the Best Buy circular named it) would seem to have something of a tweak as well. Maybe some tightening of the internals and some optimizations with more efficient RAM modules or something of that sort. Something where those Diablo tweaks really shine through, but aren't so missed on the N800/N810 models.

Again, just some thoughts after reading and thinking a bit.

El Amir 2008-03-30 23:35

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cdmackay (Post 161969)
is it possible that the n810w will have anything worthwhile for those of us in the UK? i.e. without wimax?

A different coloured N810 :D

salomc 2008-03-31 01:54

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ARJWright (Post 162568)
Would love to see Diablo (a 4.1 not a 5) introduce some consistency in the UI across the default and some of the included 3rd party apps.

Couldn't agree more with you. My main problem with my N800 is that it is (very) uncomfortable to use with one hand, and without the help of stylus. Of course, we do not use a pocket device only in the sitting position, and it has to be taken in account by the UI team.

I see this point as the main difference/weakness between the Tablets and the iphones/ipods, and maybe should be reinfoced in the next generations. I mean, we don't need all that eye-candy things, but we *do* need the easyness and pleasure to read emails/browse sites.

tso 2008-03-31 13:03

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
i dont think the tablets where ever designed to be used on the go like a phone or similar...

Texrat 2008-03-31 16:12

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tso (Post 162773)
i dont think the tablets where ever designed to be used on the go like a phone or similar...

Sure they were. But that assumed a robust wifi infrastructure... which exists in some areas, almost in others and not at all in even more. : /

Brucealeg 2008-03-31 17:51

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
I recall several post where people wanted to see the gecko code updated to the more recent code base to gain some performance benefits. Are there any rumors that this 4.1 release could do that? I love the browser, but any performance boosts would be great.

Also, I noticed some flash movies (youtube) are a little slow (even when not in a high bit rate) - to be expected from a 400mhz processor. Is there any educated opinion that updated/better optimized Flash or Gecko code could improve playback some?

Maybe the better question is this, are there any educated opinions that there are video performance enhancement yet to come?

Thanks,
Bruce

yerga 2008-03-31 18:59

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brucealeg (Post 162943)
I recall several post where people wanted to see the gecko code updated to the more recent code base to gain some performance benefits. Are there any rumors that this 4.1 release could do that? I love the browser, but any performance boosts would be great.

You can see the browser changelog from the last published version (1.0.3) in its svn.
There you have an idea of the work that they are doing in the browser.

microb-engine changelog: https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scm...er&view=markup
libgtkmozembed changelog: https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scm...er&view=markup


There are a few very interesting patchs in libgtkmozembed on March 18th.

Bundyo 2008-03-31 19:06

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Aaargh, kinetic scroll... i hate this thing. :)

tso 2008-03-31 19:15

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
glad im not alone on that kinetic scroll thingy. must be one of the most insane memes apple have spawend in recent times...

spartanNTX 2008-03-31 19:19

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Is it correct then that we should expect the Diablo release to come out at some point today?

It was going to arrive simultaneously with the WiMax edition correct?

GeneralAntilles 2008-03-31 19:21

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spartanNTX (Post 163009)
Is it correct then that we should expect the Diablo release to come out at some point today?

It was going to arrive simultaneously with the WiMax edition correct?

Nothing to expect, as there has been no official word. ;)

Benson 2008-03-31 19:27

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Well, the N810W announcement is expected tomorrow by many people.
But there was a gap between N810 announcement and launch, and another gap before we got OS2008 for N800.

So don't get your hopes up...

spartanNTX 2008-03-31 19:31

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Benson (Post 163014)
Well, the N810W announcement is expected tomorrow by many people.
But there was a gap between N810 announcement and launch, and another gap before we got OS2008 for N800.

So don't get your hopes up...

It's far too late to tell me not to get my hopes up :)

Texrat 2008-03-31 19:37

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spartanNTX (Post 163020)
It's far too late to tell me not to get my hopes up :)

Okay, go ahead and get your hopes up, but go to sleep and we'll wake you when there's news. :D

dcarter 2008-03-31 19:59

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 163023)
Okay, go ahead and get your hopes up, but go to sleep and we'll wake you when there's news. :D

AHAAA!

You mean TOMORROW, doncha??

;)

dcarter

spartanNTX 2008-03-31 20:10

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 163023)
Okay, go ahead and get your hopes up, but go to sleep and we'll wake you when there's news. :D

:) Sounds good. Don't worry about waking me though, I have a 7 mo. old who is both teething and coughing due to a cold so I only vaguely remember that "sleeping" thing you are referring to anyway.

Texrat 2008-03-31 20:16

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spartanNTX (Post 163047)
:) Sounds good. Don't worry about waking me though, I have a 7 mo. old who is both teething and coughing due to a cold so I only vaguely remember that "sleeping" thing you are referring to anyway.

It's overrated.

tso 2008-03-31 20:28

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
life in general is overrated...

Texrat 2008-03-31 20:38

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tso (Post 163057)
life in general is overrated...

...and still beats the alternative. ;)

tso 2008-03-31 21:28

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
as that old bulldog said about democracy. its the worst there is, except everything else that has been tried before it...

Jaffa 2008-04-01 12:25

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
I'm all for kinetic scrolling if it helps bring some UI consistency to Maemo, woohoo :-)

For those who don't think it'll be useful, let's all hold out judgement until we use it? The quality of experience varies greatly in the implementation: it could be a rubbish implementation, or an excellent one (I put MediaBox's clever switch of the active area to a smaller portion of the item in the latter camp).

Benson 2008-04-01 14:42

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaffa (Post 163289)
I'm all for kinetic scrolling if it helps bring some UI consistency to Maemo, woohoo :-)

For those who don't think it'll be useful, let's all hold out judgement until we use it? The quality of experience varies greatly in the implementation: it could be a rubbish implementation, or an excellent one (I put MediaBox's clever switch of the active area to a smaller portion of the item in the latter camp).

Hmmm... Sounds nice; now I have to go get mediabox just to play with it. (Even though I'm happy with my media-playing setup).

And I've no great objection to kinetic scrolling per se, either. But in the browser, some level of motion is required to initiate a drag right now, because the whole page is a click-interaction area, and it has to be quick, to avoid a long-tap. This seems to make a good inertial-scroll hard; it'll be easy to send a page flying, but to give it a little half-page nudge may be hard... guess we'll see what they've got implemented when it gets here. (Or when someone gets excited enough to build from CVS and post it where I can get it...)

zerojay 2008-04-01 17:34

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaffa (Post 163289)
I'm all for kinetic scrolling if it helps bring some UI consistency to Maemo, woohoo :-)

For those who don't think it'll be useful, let's all hold out judgement until we use it? The quality of experience varies greatly in the implementation: it could be a rubbish implementation, or an excellent one (I put MediaBox's clever switch of the active area to a smaller portion of the item in the latter camp).

I've used kinetic scrolling before. Regardless of the implementation, it sucks. This better be an option I can turn off because that's seriously a showstopper in my eyes.

mikemorrison 2008-04-01 18:08

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zerojay (Post 163434)
I've used kinetic scrolling before. Regardless of the implementation, it sucks. This better be an option I can turn off because that's seriously a showstopper in my eyes.

you've gotta be kidding. sure it sucks if you have to scroll a long way or if the application can't redraw fast enough to make it smooth, but saying it sucks regardless is a bit much. have you tried it in quiver?

pixelseventy2 2008-04-01 19:35

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zerojay (Post 163434)
I've used kinetic scrolling before. Regardless of the implementation, it sucks. This better be an option I can turn off because that's seriously a showstopper in my eyes.

A little harsh, maybe, though I've never seen a very good implementation either. I can never get the damned things to stop where I want to :(

Benson 2008-04-01 20:03

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Well, the specs are simple enough; a good implementation would let you set the thing flying, then when you touch it, would quickly (but not quite instantly) brake, and wouldn't take off again if you lift fairly straight off.

The latter is the typical problem; it's exacerbated by the nonlinearity and assymetry of a finger-screen interface. When you lift your finger straight, the centroid (as measured by a touchscreen) moves. Appropriate magic to disregard this motion and catch all deliberate flicks without feel degradation is difficult, to say the least.

But my biggest complaint is the same as for kinematic scrolling; the scrolling area usually overlaps the interaction area, so a drag thought better of becomes a click, and a click smeared a little becomes a drag.

sirhunter2010 2008-04-02 17:03

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles (Post 154120)
It doesn't look like anything of the sort. Sure, Intel is pushing the lower-power x86, but they're still nowhere near the efficiency of the ARM stuff. It'll be at least another year before they can match it (probably more), and you can be certain that TI isn't gonna be sitting on their hands with the OMAP stuff while Intel is trying to catch up.

Besides, Nokia has a huge investment in ARM and OMAP, and a very strong relationship with TI (as I've mentioned in other threads). They get huge volume discounts on the OMAP stuff with because of their phones, and they know the OMAP. These are not things you throw away lightly for what amounts to a less efficient, and more expensive processor lineup targeted at larger and more expensive devices (the MIDs are somewhere between the NITs and the UMPCs) that you don't really have any experience with.

No, Nokia isn't dropping OMAP anytime soon.

General,

Are you a Nokia employee, Nokia shareholder or both? :D

Crouching Hamster

Texrat 2008-04-02 17:12

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
To continue the General's point: TI has recently developed mobile CPU technology (with MIT I believe) that reduces the power consumption to 1/3 typical existing for the same performance. That is significant. I expect that improvement to make it into ARM or a successor. In addition, new small battery tech that dramatically increases storage efficiencies is 3 years from market. We're close to a big leap in capability, boys and girls... :D

GeneralAntilles 2008-04-02 17:15

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sirhunter2010 (Post 164006)
Are you a Nokia employee, Nokia shareholder or both? :D

None of the above.

fpp 2008-04-02 18:00

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Just a guy who uses his brains well, and writes down his thoughts clearly.

Very disconcerting for most other normal people, certainly.

Texrat 2008-04-02 18:08

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fpp (Post 164048)
Just a guy who uses his brains well, and writes down his thoughts clearly.

You meant me or Benson, right? Not that ranting GA guy.

fpp 2008-04-02 21:00

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Sorry, Tex : Benson and others are certainly in the same league, but the permanent NDA you're operating under means you can't fulfill the second part of the sentence :-)

Texrat 2008-04-02 21:05

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
LOL! Arg, ya got me.

Next time I'm passing through Charles DeGaulle I'm gonna tell security that you're a "person of interest".

:p

GeneralAntilles 2008-04-02 21:14

Re: What do we know about Diablo (Maemo 4.1) ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 164162)
Next time I'm passing through Charles DeGaulle I'm gonna tell security that you're a "person of interest".

Sadly enough, that sort of **** works these days. :\


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8