![]() |
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
|
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
|
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
|
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
continuation of auxiliary hardware input, and that could certainly be a trackball (I like them too) or even the often-requested scrolling slider. Or any number of variations.
Quote:
|
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
I had completely forgotten one of my other suggestions: support for add-on input devices. Bluetooth is certainly one viable mode, and so is usb. I had envisioned a tablet that supports a slide-on sleeve with buttons for gaming. THAT would be my ideal solution. With that approach one form factor (if properly designed) could support infinite configurations. Win-win-win. After all, look at (again) Nintendo's success in that area... |
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
And that's the sort of junk that UI experts specialize in, leading me to conclude that the less UI experts are involved with a project, the more usable it will be. ^ General statement ^ (Not intended as a diss on Ragnar or Maemo UI.) Quote:
|
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm95.gif |
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Remember not all hardware keyboards are equal...
For me it is impossible to do serious console or chat on a Nokia E51 with a keypad or (hypothetically) a device with virtual keyboard such as N800 or a Sharp Zaurus SL C1000 with a bad hardware keyboard. With Nokia E71 and Nokia N810 I can do it. Quote:
Quote:
Once my tablet has 32 GB SD it will become my MP3 player replacing my Iriver H340. But it is not as if this is a necessary for most people, and its not as if I really need all those GBs. They're part of lazyness. I bought the N810 for its GPS (a mistake) and hardware keyboard (a sound choice; especially as compliment to phone or replacement for laptop). Perhaps one has to realize there are different hardware demands. Differentiate them in various groups which make sense and serve different types of groups. However, do not assume people buy both devices. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In any case, I do not deny that a hardware_key device can be sufficient or can be good. I assert a finger-based touchscreen device can be good, but it is not something you like to hear or are even able to imagine, it seems. Quote:
As for choice, perhaps some device like N800, relatively cheap, with new hardware (OMAP3) but without fancy HD camera or HSPA. But then again, you MUST have a stylus mode. You MUST optimize your GUI for stylus usage. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Where is Nokia - no announcement no product - still in hibernation
Quote:
The question for Nokia has never been how the n900 will communicate, but what purpose it should have. Things at this forum went as far as a Nokia-sponsored poll as to what to call this next device. So here's what I think: This type of device, the "internet tablet", is having an identity crises as it's being squashed between netbooks and really smart phones. Before the netbook came out, this "internet tablet" was a good distance away (price and size) from tablets (you know, those swiveling things) and it looked like there was a future. Now, throw in some netbooks, some really smart phones and some vaporware like Pandora and the spectrum smears immediately. These MID's or "internet tablet's" have now been forced to run to the best non-overlapping corner they can find: the "multi-media internet thingy" (the Archos 5 ilk). Gross. So, for foot print, here's what we've got in order of size and power: laptops tablets (swiveling things) netbooks (some now swiveling) MID's, "internet tablets", "multi-media internet thingys", whatever really smart phones smart phones phones And for wireless communication protocols in these devices, here's what we've got in order of ubiquity: GSM CDMA HSPA WiMAX (not really) WiFi Bluetooth Nokia is a phone company. They're doing exactly what they're suppose to be doing: finding a solid home for their phones. They were able to take "internet tablet" chances when netbooks, really smart phones and other "multi-media internet thingys" didn't exist, but that gadgetscape is gone, and all that is left for them to do is compete in the really smart phone market. I get it; but I'm a geek, and thus, I don't like it. F*ck, I'm back cheering-on the Pandora. But without a cash infusion they seem doomed. My stupid fantasy is that Mark Shuttleworth would find himself bored today and help them out. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8