maemo.org - Talk - Official specs of Jolla phone surface

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)

- Jolla1 & TOH (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=56)

- - Official specs of Jolla phone surface (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=91408)

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

Quote:

Originally Posted by pichlo (Post 1378472)

This comes from my N900. Does N9's free look different?

Code:

BusyBox v1.21.1 (Debian 1.21.1power1+thumb0) built-in shell (ash)

Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.



~ $ free

             total         used         free       shared      buffers

Mem:        235252       229308         5944            0         2580

-/+ buffers:             226728         8524

Swap:       804856        86948       717908

~ $

Same - you even have a greater version of bb (N9's is 1.20.0)

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akkumaru (Post 1378350)

You guys are funny :p N9's keyboard was AMONG THE BEST virtual keyboard there is to exist. I rarely have mistakes, heck, I can even type without looking :p iPhone iOS 7's keyboard was a little better, Android's is just horrible. I'm glad to say at least that it will be using maliit :)

Which Android-keyboard you mean, or all of them (~100)?
https://play.google.com/store/search?q=keyboard&c=apps

I must say, I type faster with Samsung Galaxy S3 touchscreen qwerty, than with N900 hardware qwerty. There was alot more typos in the start, but those have gone away with time and with a help of word correction aid.

I use couple of soft keyboards daily. Hacker's keyboard is useful in ssh-terminals:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/d...ion.pckeyboard

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

this RAM argument is actually funny. i don't think the slowdowns of n9 is because of ram. not even close in my opinion. i don't know the exact reason (maybe the cpu?) but RAM amount is definitely not the case. my experience with the RAM of n9's was that the device almost always uses most of the ram BUT that never determined my device's speed. heck i even managed to open 30 apps without a slowdown when almost 800 mb memory was used before testing the device.
anyway i'm hoping (actually sure) that those problems are solved on the sailfish device. the only thing that may consume memory is the heavy crapdroid applications (maybe good acl from jolla?). 1gb ram is not a limitation. it will be enough if the os is good/optimized/whatever enough to handle the memory amount.

if you want so much RAM buy a galaxy note 3.

now you can call me a fanboy.

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

BTW, have Jolla announced what the phone is going to be called? If not may I suggest N10! That would be a real slap in the trojans face. :)

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

It's called "The Jolla".

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

In that case I suggest the Maemo community should call it N10, unofficially.

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

Quote:

Originally Posted by xerxes2 (Post 1378559)

In that case I suggest the Maemo community should call it N10, unofficially.

If the device actually is like a portable computer and you can get a keyboard other half, some part of the community may want to call it N1000 :-)

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

Yeah, Jolla NX perhaps. :)

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

Well... N900->N9->... N0.09?

Re: Official specs of Jolla phone surface

Quote:

Originally Posted by Artyom (Post 1378544)

The Jolla guys couldn't get multitasking to work properly on N900 nor N9. Why do you think they will get it right now with 1gb of RAM????