Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 

+10000000000000000000000000000000000000

Re: What works better in the PR1.2
 

Hey,

has anyone tried sending your contacts to a bluetooth car kit or head unit yet?

this could make or break it for me. :D

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 

correction: address your own personal screw-up

Then stop moaning like a spoilt child.

Not necessary..... they did not approve that leaked PR1.2

Are you speaking for all or yourself ?

There are many others who do not share your opinions and conclusion....

You almost sound like a child who has flashed his dad's phone without seeking permission and is now dreading the repercussions.

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 

@vickyg exactly what iam thinking i bought the n900 couse its OPEN SOURCE like anybody told us before Nokia or the Meamo Community and now i have to complain about Strategy from Nokia why they dont give Informations and getting called a whiner.. I guess anybody should know what OPEN SOURCE means?

And again i have to say that i thought that the Maemo Council is connected to the Nokia HQ and be able to give some Informations to there Community. And we all have to stop now to call each other fanboy, whiner, troll we are all N900 Users and not a least Buyers arent we?

Maybe my Comment will be banned now too?

best regards Crown

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 

It's not a secret. It's unfinished. That's the problem.

It was considered a leak because it's unfinished. If it were an OS or library update, apt-get update all day. Those still have to be committed before you can update.

This was a phone firmware revision that was unfinished. Nothing to do with opensource - there are updates for Maemo5 OS that once are finalized, they're committed and you can get them. But this is a firmware update for the phone... slight difference, especially when it's unfinished as it seems to be.

Re: how old is the leaked pr 1.2 ?
 

I wasn't suggesting that 20101103 was from the version number, that string is visible within the file not as part of the name.

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 

If you eat an uncooked meal, you will most likely get stomachache.

However open the kitchen is, ask the cook.

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 

Well technically this is more Ajar Source; some parts are open and some parts are closed. Furthermore, just because something is open source, the authors shouldn't feel pressured to release it until they feel it's ready.

"Where's that code you said you were writing?
"Actually, I'm not done; there are so many bugs I'd be embarrassed to see it in the wild.
"You suck and don't understand what open source is!
"O Rly? In that case I won't bother finishing it, so it'll never be released.

Re: how old is the leaked pr 1.2 ?
 

The way I read the firmware version number here is, like Venemo suggests:

RX-51_2009SE_10. 2010 Week 12 Build 9 Public Release... I have no idea what MR stands for but MR0 would be something like Mobile/Marketing Region 0 - Global.

However, the date you found would suggest week 10.

Re: [Opinion Leaked PR1.2] Are we really to blame?
 

This is not some Android or Nokia Symbian crap to be such care full. This is a phone specialty made to let users enjoy hacking there phones so you options are good for those who just want to use phone,sms,browsing and email (Android) not for N900.